‘Safety Net’

at

Um.

Last night.

Dail Eireann.

The voting on extending legislation allowing for restrictions on indoor hospitality for another three months. As a “safety net”, according to Health Minister Stephen Donnelly.

Sponsored Link

42 thoughts on “‘Safety Net’

    1. Mr.T

      Because they have no intention of letting them go for good
      If they did, they would have let the legislation lapse

  1. Papi

    tHE LAST OF qUEENIE’S HAIR FALLS OUT. NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT ISSSSSS COMING!!!!

    *covers one eye…….

      1. Papi

        Covid post. Queenie appears.

        Like magic. Except when this will be over, and it will, you’ll be the paranoid delusional keyboard crank forever.

  2. SOQ

    One group of potentially infectious people being allowed inside while another, some of whom can prove they are not infectious, is not is a safety net- it is coercion and there is no scientific basis for it.

  3. Cui Bono?

    Unscientific, immoral, discriminatory, disgraceful and yet it was obviously going to be extended because this has absolutely nothing to do with a virus.

    1. Kim Cardassian

      Using peer reviewed evidence and citations, please provide your hypothesis highlighting why this is not about the virus.

      1. SOQ

        Using peer reviewed evidence and citations, please provide your hypothesis highlighting why vaccine passports are an effective means of reducing infection.

        A little more relevant I think.

        1. Kim Cardassian

          You’re better than that SOQ. Both hypotheses can be tested separately, although you’ll note at no point did I make that hypothesis. You are asserting I am, thus twisting the narrative. Please do better.

  4. E'Matty

    Ah, they know we’re going to see a rise after they open everything up at the end of the month, just as we did last year. It’s called the respiratory virus season and after the success of last Christmas where they managed to convince the sheep to lock down for 6 months, they will this time use the natural rise in respiratory illness to blame and attack anyone still not vaccinated. This never had anything to do with protecting against a virus. It is and always has been about getting these vaccines into as much of the world’s population, particularly the developed countries, as possible.

    1. Fred

      They know but you also know. Perhaps your time would be better spent below the lines of message boards in countries yet to receive the vax. By your calculations it is far too late for us here… terrified!

    2. Jonsmoke

      “‘This never had anything to do with protecting against a virus. It is and always has been about getting these vaccines into as much of the world’s population, particularly the developed countries, as possible.”

      This statement confuses me. If it never had anything to with protecting against a virus, then why is it about getting the vaccines into as much people as possible? Don’t vaccines protect again viruses? Wouldn’t you want as much people as possible to be vaccinated?

      If it is not about protecting against a virus, then what has is got to do with?

      1. SOQ

        We are all still trying to figure that out Jonsmoke- and it is very very hard not to go down conspiracy rabbit holes while doing so.

        The most logical explanation to me is that the pharma industry has grown so powerful that they now can call the shots in democratic countries- just look at how they threatened Brazil and Argentina? India stood up to them because they had already ran Gates out.

        And right from day one, the main media was hyping vaccines long before any were even developed. Follow the money as they say- which is what happened in New South Wales and hey presto- resignations at the top table.

        Pretty sure you will find plenty in pharma’s pocket here too?

        1. Jonsmoke

          So, SOQ, you reckon that the pharma industry have bullied or bribed or whatever you’re having yourself, the governments of loads of countries into buying millions of doses or vaccines and rolling out these huge vaccination programs so they can make loads of money?Sure, there wasn’t going to me much persuasion needed, was there? That was always going to happen. We all knew vaccines were going to be the only way to get back to some sort of normality, we didn’t need the media to hype anything. They had to be paid for.

          1. chris

            “we all knew vaccines were going to be…”

            This isn’t true but it was presented that way. Vaccine’s take at least 8 years to develop, the logical alternative was treatments – these were suppresed as they’d negate the EUA.

            HCQ and Ivermectin both perform better than these ‘vaccines’ without the disastrous side effects. We still don’t know the medium to long term effects either, but there are some troubling indications that things may get worse.

          2. SOQ

            @Jonsmoke it’s fact- they forced governments to take whatever up front no matter what other treatments became available and the governments in turn felt they had no option but to accept.

            Combine that with a bought and paid for media and a lot of the medical establishment, plus the authoritarian thuggish nature of some others- and you have the emerging form of corporate fascism.

          3. Jonsmoke

            @ Chris,

            ” the logical alternative was treatments “….eh…no. Vaccines stop you getting the virus (or at least keeps it to a level that doesn’t require hospitalisation) and they also stop you from infecting other people, who in turn infect others and then we have people dying in their homes because the hospital system can’t cope with the volume of seriously ill people. Why would you wait for people to get seriously sick and then give them treatment that may or may not work, when you can stop them getting sick in the first place.

          4. chris

            Nonsense, they do nothing of the kind as is evident if you look at the latest UK figures. Again, you’re parroting propaganda – not the empirical evidence. And Ivermectin actually works as a prophalactic, unlike these ‘vaccines’.

          5. Nigel

            ‘the logical alternative was treatments’

            First of all, what treatments?
            Second of all, the use of vaccines doesn’t negate the need for treatments – they’re not in some sort of competition, we need both.

          6. Jonsmoke

            ah, will you go away outta that SOQ!

            Next you’ll be telling me the moon landings were faked and the earth is flat.

          7. SOQ

            Nope no conspiracies, well not like that anyways, but I am very suspicious when it comes to grants- there is always strings.

            I think we can all agree that there is the potential for big bucks to be made out of this Covid game. I have wondered if the reason why so medics are laying it on thick is that they see an opportunity to leverage proper health funding after decades of cuts.

        2. f_lawless

          Big Pharma is just one head of a many-headed beast. The global capitalist system has evolved to the point where just two or three companies now own controlling shares in virtually all the major corporations of the world be it in the pharmaceutical industry, the financial industry, media, Big Tech, etc.

          The asset management companies BlackRock Inc. and Vanguard Group stand at the top of the pyramid. And then Vanguard is the biggest shareholder in Blackrock.

          https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/04/bill-sardi/who-runs-the-world-blackrock-and-vanguard/

          1. chris

            It’s complete corporate capture at this point, the game is up. It’s unfortunate that people don’t have the grounding to understand the situation.

            All the institutions we looked to with trust are now effectively gone. It’s a betrayal that’s so big, many will refuse to see it.

          2. SOQ

            Agreed chris- it is not that it could happen that people have difficulty accepting, it is the absolute scale of it.

  5. Micko

    Pretty worrying stuff coming in from Canada

    Soon everyone over the age of 12 will have to be vaccinated if they want to travel on a plane or train.

    Also government employees will have to be too or face unpaid leave.

    https://youtu.be/lQdrhGv9CJk?t=2068

    But not MP’s. They will have parliamentary privilege not to get vax’d

    Looks like they’re going after a three tier society so – the Rulers, the vax;d and the unclean.

    Nice. Well played ;)

    1. Fred

      Try not to worry too much about your Canadian Comrades Mick, there is little you can do about it here. Just get out for a nice walk and enjoy the nature or you could stick your fake vax pass up on a few Canadian forums, that could help a few of them out actually now that I think about it.

      1. Micko

        “a nice walk and enjoy the nature”

        ARE YOU MAD SIR? THERE”S A KILLER VIRUS OUT THERE MAN!!!!

        ;-)

Comments are closed.

Broadsheet.ie