One sentence strategically placed, not lost in a paragraph and eerily worded to send chills up and down your spine.
Shareable beyond telegram. Nobody would be okay with this.https://t.co/WWbZVBdSEV pic.twitter.com/YzPd9kOJID
— Real Time News (@returnofTERESA) April 11, 2022
From the Australian Department of Health’s advisory group on immunisation
Yikes!
Can they do that?
Meanwhile…
Dr. McCullough:
“This paper demonstrated that the Pfizer vaccine reverse transcribes through an enzyme called LINE-1, that means DNA is made from the Pfizer RNA code and then is installed into the human genome, or is at least found in chromatin, about 6 hours after injection… pic.twitter.com/mfmdIL6qZA
— Francesco (@Frances40996115) April 12, 2022
Ah.
Is that good?
Sponsored Link
Genuinely took 10 seconds to debunk. Why post something if you’re not going to bother doing the most rudimentary of checks. Oh that’s right, because you’re a grifter.
It’s the link in the tweet to the word document.
hahahahahaha
Like….
hahahahahahahahahahah
Oh stop…..
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Ok, laughing over now and sorry about that Tom.
Seriously though, did you think it was journalism that was going on here?
Next up, some American in a MAGA hat shoves a magnet up his backside for Siecne.
You appear to be suffering some mental health issues, Ian. The hysteria evident in your posts is quite disturbing, as is the fact that someone returning repeatedly to a website that’s literally driving them mad is, in itself, lunacy.
I find TV news disturbingly risible & unconvincing & though watching it makes me fear for the sanity of those who consume it, I’m immune to its inane jibbering, yet I take care to avoid it. You might usefully consider a similar course, even for a short, recuperative period. Quite a few here contribute the same level of drivel that you regularly attain, so your absence would hardly be noticed.
Most importantly, get well soon.
Where’s your deboonk then, Tom 2?
Regarding your screenshot from the ATAGI info sheet, I think you may have misunderstood what the sentence is saying. It is merely saying that if a patient is already sedated for another procedure, it’s an *opportunity* to vaccinate. It is not suggesting that patients be vaccinated against their will / without their knowledge (this of course doesn’t apply to situations where consent is given by someone else, eg a parent).
The reason I can say this with confidence is the fact that this is stated very clearly at the beginning of the info sheet:
“Informed consent must be obtained prior to each dose from the patient themselves, or, where the patient does not have capacity to give consent, from the parent, guardian or substitute decision-maker.”
I wonder why you ignored this sentence. I think you are seeing what you want to see.
Couldn’t they just wait until they are conscious?
couldn’t you just wait until you had made even a tiny attempt to confirm the nonsense you post?
Agreeing to get a vaccine during another procedure while unconscious seems unusual is all. Don’t have to be so snotty.
You don’t have to be so transphobic/horny for putin yet here we are?
The explanation you’re seeking is right in your post. These people have extreme needle anxiety and would like to get the vaccine. How dense are you?
I think you’ve earned snottiness between this and the turf-seller.
If their consent was sought then the injection should be administered then while the patient is able to witness it.
Unless the patient has requested such, there is absolutely no reason while a patient is temporarily unconscious.
If no consent was given, then it is an assault.
If consent was sought and received to adminster the vaccine while the patient was sedated then you can feck off out of their medical decisions.
Why do you and SOQ get so outrageously offended when someone points out your complete lack of credibility?
Are you playing up to the gullible, could that be it?
Clutching your pearls that someone might have the temerity…
Now Ian, in his delirium, has invented a new category of transphobic gay men & mucks it in with his usual retarded Ad Hominems to insult the intelligence of all who participate on this forum.
Freudian analysis might indicated a repressed desire, inflamed by the clearly signalled Alpha status of Mr Putin, as he inserts the Russian leader into a discussion about an entirely different type of penetration to the one he’s clearly fantasising about.
Couldn’t you just act like a normal adult for once?
You first, Ian.
it is not protocol to vaccinate people whilst sedated even with consent – it makes it difficult to monitor for side effects if the person is not conscious to begin with.
That’s a good point Mr T. What about the 15 min waiting period?
_______
But sure guys, everyone who wanted to get jabbed has got it.
Why do ye even bother replying to Bodger’s posts about vaccine concerns or side effects?
There’s lots of posts that have no comments on Broadsheet, why don’t you do the same here?
Because the drones are programmed into certain topics.
Anyways, have you had you Murdena shots yet Micko?
https://librti.com/page/view-video?id=1515
Alas, I remain unjabeth good sir.
And pretty bloody happy about it…
You know why, Micko, they’re wallpaper.
You know why, Micko, they’re wallpapering over the cracks. There’s a hell of a lot of people in the ground now from those fake vaccines, more than any other drug therapy in medical history, a huge multiple of the numbers from all previous, real vaccines, so the cracks are expanding & being filled with dead bodies, which isn’t a good look.
Informed Consent, Rachel, as defined medically, involves knowledge of all possible risks, contraindications & so on, as well as the efficacy of the treatment involved. Nobody who is injected with an experimental drug can possibly give informed consent. Nobody who actually knew the risks inherent in a therapy that was actually abandoned decades ago, due to its toxicity & was also sound of mind, would actually expose themselves to such a toxic, yet ineffective drug.
I would recommend you look up the meaning of the word “opportunistically”, you seem confused as to what it actually means.
I’m being a bit of a cad at the moment.
A downright rotter.
I developed a really bad cold overnight and have decided to spend the day in bed.
The fragrant Lady TenPin is convinced it’s COVID.
Although the LFT I had left over from our recent sojourn to foreign climes has told me it’s not.
I just haven’t passed that on to herself yet, enjoying as I am her tender ministrations and endless cups of tea.
I may chance a temporary recovery for the footy tonight. After all a hot toddy is just what the doctor ordered.
Lawks what a tangled web we weave …
As Ian Dury says “two fat persons, click,click, click”
Have you not been quadruple-vaxxed, TPT? If so, it’s apparently impossible for you to become infected with Sars02 & you can relax. Even if symptoms persist & worsen, you can trust in Fauci, O’Neill, et al.
Anyway, all effective treatments for Sars02 infection have been denied to the general public, lest they recover, I assume, so there’s nothing to be gained by engaging with “health professionals” or charlatans of that ilk.
Dr McCullough conveniently overlooks the fact that the study he refers to was done because a team from Whitehead/NIH had previously shown that the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself does exactly the same thing in vitro, and probably also occurs for zika, dengue and influenza virus.
All of which any sensible scientist would take with a pinch of salt because it is the result of in vitro research using immortalised cell lines at massive concentrations of virus/mRNA. But hey, clicks innit.
Peter McCullough has over 600 peer-reviewed publications, including two dozen on COVID-19 disease. He has chaired many high-risk data safety monitoring boards and knows all the inner workings of large-scale clinical trials.
He is far from click bait.
He’s a cardiologist, not an immunologist, and he has been pro hydroxychloroquinone, or whatever you call it, even after it failed trials and has been outspoken against vaccines.
I’m sure his research work as an eminent cardiologist is well received.
I work in IT but I’m not an expert on network engineering. I could probably write a network engineering paper, but I would get stuff wrong because it’s not my field of expertise. I have patents and publications in other areas, would you consider those evidence of my network engineering credentials, or would you say ‘ya he did a course in network engineering in college but he’s never worked in the field’
It’s severe cognitive bias to accept the word of any unrelated medical professional (like say a North Dublin GP or a cardiologist) on vaccination. Literally plucking any voice of dissent that suits your argument.
Great comment, Ronan.
Publishing articles does not make one an expert in a field in which they have no formal training. The authors of the Swedish Study have already issued a statement that Dr. McCullough has misinterpreted their study. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/
Well said Ronan & Chris.
Ah-ha! I see, Millie.
Actually he is both. He also has a MSC in Public Health Epidemiology from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, June 4, 1988.
If you can point me to someone more qualified to speak on the subject than Peter, please do.
What is with all the sneering and one-upmanship from you lot?
Go check his CV.
I have an MSc in Software Engineering for Computer Networks. That does not make me an expert in the field, university is not experience. There’s a reason doctors do, ya know, a bunch of training after college – to become experts in their field.
GP programmes
Surgical programmes
Emergency Medicine
Would you be happy with an eye ear and throat doctor replacing your hip?
Basically, anyone who actually works in immunology as their field of expertise is more qualified than this guy. In the same way that I don’t consider someone with an MA in Anglo Irish poetry as the eminent expert in Russian literature.
No, Ronan, I would not be happy to have my hip replaced by either an Otolaryngologist nor an Ophthalmologist but this is research not surgery & if either do successful research in another field, they might reasonably expect a PhD to be granted in the field they had been successful in, granting them the status of expert, belatedly, indeed this happens fairly often in medical science.
Once again, your analogy is wildly inaccurate & simply another Strawman fallacy.
Your assumptions & expertise about how your own field operates have led you to misunderstand another field, almost entirely.
There is no possibility of an inoculation for any Coronavirus, ever, due to their innate properties & the dishonest labelling of gene therapy as a “vaccine” makes it clear that all the major decisions surrounding the emergence of Sars02 were made for political, not medical or scientific reasons.
It’s all about overpopulation, oligarchs & Eugenics, not pandemics or protecting people’s health.
Peter McCullough has 35 peer-reviewed publications on CoVid-19 infection alone. He has 1,000 publications to his name and over 500 citations in the National Library of Medicine. He is regularly referred to as an ‘epidemiologist and cardiologist’ because that is what he is.
Why people try to discredit or nit pick his qualifications and experience, especially people outside the relevant medical fields, is a question only they can answer, although- I could hazard a good guess.
As I said- point me to whom you think is more appropriate to speak on this subject please? But you won’t, now will you?
Whatever you call it? Any link to these trials hydroxychloroquine failed? Insofar as my knowledge extends, it has been effective in vitro against 229E, the oldest known Coronavirus & a direct ancestor of 2 of the other 5 endemic Coronaviruses. I’ve not delved into this, as the fake pandemic was not about health or science, so it seems pointless.
I think your analogy is wildly inaccurate, Ronan, anyone who writes code, for example, will learn new languages & abandon older ones over time, with relative ease & given that all doctors in whatever field share the same basic medical learning, a specialist in one field is capable of studying, understanding & mastering others. A doctor or scientist who simply engages in research in another area can, for example, obtain a PhD, simply by being successful in that reasearch, so you misunderstand medicine & biology, when you view it though the lens of an entirely different & unrelated field.
I have read papers from scientists with PhDs in virology, immunology & related biochemical fields, attesting the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine & Ivermectin, the fact that their use was suppressed, in order to push a scientific impossibility, a vaccine against a Coronavirus, is evidence enough of their efficacy.
I have a hard time believing some these sorts of characters are genuine.
The attempts to nit pick the credentials of a heavy hitters like Peter McCullough, while deliberately ignoring pharmaceutical companies with track records in criminality, caught hiding a list of vaccine injuries as long as your arm, screams paid shills to me.
Hardcore trolling from Down Under is nothing new:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FMIhRJDWYAgS_VQ?format=jpg&name=medium
Hi, Ferg, I’m just placing this here so you’re no longer bottom of the pile, from which position the content of your post would appear to be mocking yourself.
Now, that’s better, you can leave the mockery of your regurgitated tabloid newspaper tittle-tattle to others.
You’d be better off talking to a doctor. I’ve no interest in your sickness.
“I’ve no interest in your sickness.” I’m sure managing your own must be a full time job in itself.
Miss your counselling appointment. did you?
While I wouldn’t want to disparage anyone that needs the help of mental health services – it’s not something I ever feel the need to partake in.
I’d posit that a great deal of people’s struggles are directly related to external factors such as the growing dystopia inhabited by most. Sure – ‘it helps to talk’ – but when seeking the cause of this malaise gets attributed to ‘chemical imbalances’ or ‘mothers’ it belies the significance of our environments.
That said, to be lost in the miasma for too long can send anyone of their rocker (you). This can be somewhat offset by changes to the immediate environment, learning the difference between ‘information’ & intent, long walks etc.
Níl aon chiall le baint as an bpíosa seo.
Wisdom isn’t a strong point of yours. Blather on the other hand…
It’s always funny when the most unbalanced inmates turn on each other