Tag Archives: consultants

accenture

Earlier this morning Fiach Kelly, of the Irish Times, reported that a briefing document sent by Irish Water to the Oireachtas environment committee – ahead of its 2.15pm meeting today with Irish Water CEO John Tierney – shows that Irish Water plans to spend over €80million on consultant or outside contractor costs by mid-2015.

Mr Kelly reports that the document show €44.8million will go to IBM, €17.2million to Accenture, €4.6million to Ernst & Young, €970,000 to McCann Fitzgerald solicitors, €2.9million to A&L Goodbody, €2.2million to KPMG, and €13.3million to 18 other contractors.

Meanwhile, Brian O’Connell joined Seán O’Rourke on RTÉ Radio One this morning to talk about a 12-week contract awarded to Accenture, one of the first contracts issued in relation to Irish Water, in May 2012.

Mr O’Connell reported that the contract was worth just over €398,689 and explained that, under EU procurement rules, if a contract goes over €400,000 there has to be an open competition. So, because this contract was €1,311 under the €400,000 threshold, there was no open competition.

However, there were issues raised internally about the contract.

Brian O’Connell: “I understand Seán that, at a senior level, some staff were not happy with how some contracts were being issued and awarded and had concerns that procedures, rules and guidelines around that, the May 2012 Accenture contract, was issued as a change to a pre-existing contract. So this is called a change request, and it related to a contract Bord Gáis had, with Accenture for unbundling. And that was part of an EU energy directive. Now unbundling was about separating ownership and operation of gas and networks, from supply of gas. Accenture had done a lot of work, on this separation. But because the sale of Bord Gáis Energy was decided upon, that effectively broke up the networks and the supplies so this May 2012 contract related to the setting up of Irish Water. I understand concerns were raised, at a later stage, around why there wasn’t an open competition held by Bord Gáis in the awarding of this particular contract considering that it did go very close to the €400,000 threshold.”

Seán O’Rourke: “And originally it was a Bord Gáis contract, but which was, if you like, extra work bolted on for the establishment of Irish Water. Now, do we know Brian whether an investigation was conducted? Or what the final amount of the contract was?”

Brian O’Connell: “Well my understanding is that the issue was considered so serious that it was brought directly to the attention of the new CEO Michael McNicholas in May 2013 and that Bord Gáis put across a number of points in defence of the awarding of the contract. An investigation was carried out Seán. The complaint was not upheld. The defence put forward I think, as I understand it, was around the urgency with which the contract had to be issued. And the nature of the work meant that, the company argued, that Accenture was best placed to fulfil the contract. So there are a number of exceptions, where you don’t have ot go to full and open competition. Urgency would have been…”

O’Rourke: “So, these concerns were raised internally, by senior staff, and the investigation was conducted internally as well?”

O’Connell: “As I understand it, and the complaints weren’t upheld. Now this does raise a number of questions. It raises questions around how many contracts may have been awarded under previous arrangements between Bord Gáis and consultants, that would have pre-dated the setting up of Irish Water? It raises questions about why didn’t Bord Gáis go to a full and open competition especially, considering Seán, there was a potential that this contract could go over €400,000, considering that it was so close to the threshold. Bord Gáis were awarded the Irish Water contract on the basis that they had a lot of capabilities in-house.”

O’Rourke: “Yeah, this is something that I think came out very strongly on the [RTÉ] This Week programme, [journalist] John Burke there got hold of a document, a 20-page document which explained that there was a lot of stuff, whether it was about transformation or about technology and billing systems, and so forth, which was already being done by Bord Gáis. They were the guys who knew how to handle this stuff.”

O’Connell: “Yeah, and Bord Gáis were saying ‘look, we have a lot of in-house capabilities here already. We’re best-placed to get this gig because of that. Now, some of the items that Accenture were paid for in this contract included ‘defining plans to design and implement governance plans’, ‘external communications plans’ and what they call a ‘roadmap to deliver IT systems’. Now, obviously I’ve put a series of detailed questions to Irish Water yesterday, asking them things like how long this particular May 2012 contract actually ran for? What the final amount of the contract was? How many subsequent contracts, for example, the company was awarded? And whether these went to full and open competitions? Bord Gáis or Irish Water have said to me that they won’t be making any comment on my specific questions before an appearance by Irish Water executives before the Environment Committee today.”

Separately, this morning Irish Water released a statement saying all contracts awarded by Irish Water and Bord Gáis, in the establishment of Irish Water, are fully compliant  with EU public sector procurement guidelines.

Listen back here.

Irish Water spend on consultants and contractors will top €80 million (Fiach Kelly, Irish Times)

Poolbeg

(The proposed Poolbeg incinerator by Covanta)

You may recall in March 2012, how Joe McCarthy, who blew the whistle on the e-voting machines scandal, complained to the European Commission in respect of Covanta’s proposal to build a waste incinerator at Poolbeg.

His complaint was three-fold. According to Mr McCarthy:

  • The contract for the incinerator was awarded to a company which did not bid.
  • The contract for the incinerator was almost double the size advertised.
  • The amount spent on services was over four times the amount awarded.

This morning the Irish Times reports that Dublin City Council,who has paid more than €32million to consultancy firm RPS for its services over the last ten years in relation to the proposed Poolbeg incinerator, is terminating its contract with RPS.

Olivia Kelly writes:

“Head of waste management Peadar O’Sullivan yesterday told councillors the contract with consultancy firm RPS would be terminated. The move follows the intervention of the European Commission, which found that the contract did not conform with EU law.”

While it upheld the complaint in relation to the procurement of consultancy services, it dismissed several others.”.

Oh.

And ‘construction will begin early next year’.

EU complaint (Fiasco.ie)

Previously: Covanta And Dublin City Council: What’s That Funny Smell?

No, Seriously, Why Did A New Jersey-Based Waste Company Employ Phil Hogan’s Golf Buddy?

…to give money to the people we borrowed money off in order to spend money.

The Revenue Commissioners paid almost €90 million to the management consultancy and technology services company Accenture for contract work over recent years, it has emerged.

Minister for Finance Michael Noonan told the Dáil the company had been one of a number of firms which provided IT-related work for the Revenue Commissioners in recent years. A total of 39 companies and organisations received more than €131 million between them to carry out IT-related work for the Revenue Commissioners between 2008 and 2011. Accenture received €11.69 million in 2011, €25.436 million in 2010, €22.466 million in 2009 and €28.927 million in 2008.

Nice work, fellas.

Revenue paid €90m to management consultancy (Martin Wall, Irish Times)

(Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland)

THE REVENUE Commissioners has said it believes Government departments and public bodies have been involved in “a number of instances” of “offensive tax avoidance and or abuse”, according to documents released under the Freedom of Information Acts.

The documents, which did not detail cases, said the instances had “directly or indirectly” come to the attention of Revenue and were considered a breach of tax codes. “Where such activities come to Revenue’s attention we will challenge them by reference to the law,” the documents said.

Released by the Department of Health to The Irish Times, the documents were issued to departments when concerns were raised in the Dáil about the tax compliance of consultants hired by ministers on special contracts through consultancy companies.

This should be fun…

Tax abuse in State bodies, says Revenue (Fiona Gartland, Irish Times)

(Laura Hutton,/Photocall Ireland)