Tag Archives: ECB

Responding to reports that the ECB had rejected Ireland’s proposal for a longer repayment schedule, Mr Varakdar disputed this was the case.

“There was no rejection. There was no breakdown. There are issues that need to be changed. And issues that need to be agreed on,” he said on RTÉ’s The Week in Politics.

Setting out the nature of the talks, he said: “There is agreement in a lot of areas, but there are a number of issues outstanding and some of those issues are very difficult . . . We need to work on them but we are still very hopeful of getting a resolution.”

The ECB told The Irish Times yesterday that it was “premature” to refer to any outcome and that talks on this issue were ongoing.

All righty, then. Or not.

Ministers concede difficulties with ECB over deal on promissory notes (Harry McGee, Suzanne Lynch, Tom Hennigan, Irish Times)

(Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland)

Jean-Claude Trichet, former European Central Bank president and the man behind those ECB letters, appeared on CNN yesterday.

He didn’t talk about the letters:

“Trichet also praised Ireland for the steps its government has made to stimulate the country’s economy in an effort to return to international bond markets next year. “Ireland needed the help of the International Monetary Fund and Europe… It is one of the countries that have really done the job to get back to competitiveness,” Trichet said. But he refused to speculate over letters he sent in 2010 to then-Irish Finance Minister Brian Lenihan, weeks before Ireland requested a bailout. “These were messages that were confidential at the time.”

But he did have this to say:

Jean Claude Trichet: “When you embark on a non-standard measure and there are non-standard measures in Japan, there are non-standard measures in the US, there are non-standard measures in the UK. I mean all of the advanced economies have embarked on non-standard measures. It seems to me that it is justified if you are in a situation where obviously you have the markets that are not functioning correctly. So you have to substitute, or to counter, markets that are not functioning correctly and are hampering the transmission of the monetary policy. But it also gives time to the other partners which are not on either governments  and their policies, but also the private sector. And the message of the central bank is, and rightly so, we are understanding that you are doing all what is necessary to get back to a normal situation and it is on that understanding that we are doing some non-standard measures. But it should be exactly appropriate to the situation, to the disfunctioning of the markets and, of course, on the basis of the hard job being done by the other partners. Otherwise it would only serve as permitting them, not to correct the absurd policies that have been pursued in the past or the imbalances that have to be corrected today.”

CNN: “In the last few weeks there’s been what looks to me and a lot of people, as a lot of tension between those from the Bundesbank inside the ECB and the decisions that seem to be getting made. Do you see a rift inside the ECB now? And was there a lot of tension between the German members of the ECB and your team and others?”

Trichet: “Well first of all, in all decision-making bodies of the central banks, you have pros and cons. As you know it is published in the UK, or in the US, or Japan and it’s very, very often that decisions are taken by a majority and there is a minority. A minority has its own view. That’s the way  things are, I would say, constructed in most banks. But of course in the case of the European Central Bank, we have 17 countries and the decision was taken at the very beginning that of course we would have discussions. There would be a majority, a simple majority is the way the treaty has imagined to organise the council of governance of the ECB. But it was decided at the very beginning that we would all speak with one voice. Because precisely it is sufficiently, it’s a sufficient challenge to have to cope with the 17 countries. I personally regret that we could not stick to this one voice concept but it is the case. I mean I observe that. And I’m sure that, I would say all members of the governing council are speaking with their own, you know, sincere analysis of the situation. It is not necessarily abnormal that we have different views as is the case in the US or in Japan. But I trust that all, of course, colleagues are loyal to the institution. We have a treaty and we have to respect the treaty. We have an exceptional situation, we have to stick to our mandate which is the primary mandate of preserving price stability. This has been done remarkably well by the ECB in its first 13/14 years, almost 14 years. Remarkably well – better than in the past of any central bank over the past say 40 years or 50 years. So we have to recognise that. This is a success of the central bank itself. That being said we are in situations that are absolutely exceptional at the global level and of course at the European level.”

CNN: “But, as you said, we now see the crack. We’re don’t hear one voice coming from the ECB anymore. That must be worrying to you?”

Trichet: “Well again, I experienced that myself and I have full respect for all my colleagues. I understand fully there own rezoning. I have to say that what I had observed in my time and I’m sure that it is still the case, they are loyal, all of them. And I’m not speaking of any particular member of the governing council. I think it’s loyalty to the institution. After all, all of the democracies in Europe have decided, apart from the UK and Denmark decided that we would have the ECB, the European Central Bank and the single currency and that is what we’re going to do by our democracies. So loyalty to the institution seems to me to be absolutely essential. The fact that each member of the governing council speaks itself in the governing council, in its own views and own analysis is something which is indisputable. I would hope that in a very difficult period, a crisis period, we remain as, I would say, as cautious as possible.”

Trichet: Bond Buying Program May Be ‘justified’ (CNN)

The ECB letter brouhaha.

A timeline:

April 4, 2011: In an interview with Economics Editor of the Irish Times Dan O’Brien, the late former Finance Minister Brian Lenihan said he received a letter from Jean-Claude Trichet on November 12, 2010 outlining how the ECB wanted Ireland to accept a bailout. Lenihan told O’Brien Ireland was “bounced” into the EU/IMF deal.

April, 2011: TheJournal.ie made an FOI request for copies of corresondence between Lenihan and the ECB/European Commission, IMF and Her Majesty’s Treasury in November 2010.

June, 2011: TheJournal.ie received a response from the ECB. The response includes a schedule of documents between the parties and whether they could be released or not. These included:
Letter from Trichet to Lenihan on November 2, 2010, already released.
Lenihan to Trichet on November 4, 2010, release refused.
Lenihan to Ollie Rehn on November 4, 2010, release refused.
Trichet to Lenihan on November 12, 2010, release refused.
ECB President to Lenihan on November 19, release refused.
Lenihan to ECB President on November 21, release refused.
Lenihan to Rehn, on November 21, release refused.
Lenihan to Rehn, on November 30, release refused.

December, 2011: Gavin Sheridan of TheStory.ie asked the ECB to release copies of all the letters sent by the ECB to Lenihan during November 2010.

In its response, the ECB said there were two letters, dated November 18 and 19, sent from Trichet to Lenihan.
The ECB released the first letter which was sent on the same day Central Bank Governor Patrick Honohan confirmed on RTE Radio One that Ireland was getting a loan from the EU/IMF – despite claims just days before by then Fianna Fail ministers Noel Dempsey and Dermot Ahern that this wasn’t the case.  It said releasing the letter of November 19 would “undermine the protection of the public interest”.

August 17, 2012: Economist Karl Whelan blogged about the matter on Forbes.com. He posed several questions in relation to the crucial November 12 letter:“Did the ECB communicate with Brian Lenihan on November 12, 2010? If so, why was this letter not referred to in response to Mr. Sheridan’s request?”“Did the ECB threaten to withdraw funding from Irish banks unless Ireland entered an EU-IMF program, either in a letter dated November 12 or in meetings the following weekend?“What are the contents of the November 19 letter and why is this letter considered so sensitive given that it was clear to all after Governor Honohan’s remarks on November 18 that a bailout deal was being concluded?

Today (September 1, 2012):
Stephen Collins of the Irish Times writes (top) that he has seen three letters sent by Trichet to Lenihan in November 2010. Collins asserts that the letters are from October 15, November 4 and November 19. He also claimed an email or fax “reinforcing the message” was sent to Lenihan on November 12 – prompting a phone call between the pair on the same day.The article states: “The Department of Finance made reference to the letters in response to a freedom of information request by The Irish Times.”

But TheJournal.ie has posted a story this morning, stating: “The Department of Finance has said there are no plans to release the letters that European Central Bank sent to former finance minister Brian Lenihan in the build-up to Ireland applying for a bailout in 2010.”

It adds: “A spokesman for the Department of Finance said today that the Department did not release the documents to the paper nor was he aware of any leak either from the Department or its Freedom of Information Unit.
The spokesperson said that the documents released to the Irish Times in response to an FOI request were the same that were released to other media organisations including TheJournal.ie.”

Hmm.

Anyone?

Previously: ECB’s Secret Letter To ireland

Brian Lenihan at a pre-budget press conference on November 12, 2010.

So many questions…

Karl Whelan writes:

Did the ECB communicate with Brian Lenihan on November 12, 2010? If so, why was this communication not referred to in response to the [FOI] request by Mr.[Gavin] Sheridan [of TheStory.ie] request?

Did the ECB threaten to withdraw funding from Irish banks unless Ireland entered an EU-IMF program, either in a letter dated November 12 or in meetings the following weekend?

What are the contents of the November 19 letter and why is this letter considered so sensitive given that it was clear to all after [Central Bank] Governor [Patrick] Honohan’s remarks on November 18 that a bailout deal was being concluded?

 

Anyone?

 

The ECB’s Secret Letter To Ireland: Some Questions (Karl Whelan, Forbes)

(Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland)

That’s Spanish for double standards.

Which Paddy hates.

The European Central Bank declined to comment on a report that it had recommended that senior bondholders should take losses in the event of a restructuring of Spanish bank debt.

A report in the Wall Street Journal today said ECB President Mario Draghi advocated imposing losses on senior bondholders issued by “the most severely damaged” Spanish savings banks at a meeting of European Union finance ministers on July 9.

 

ECB Declines to Comment on Spanish Bank Bond Loss Report in WSJ (Bloomberg)

As German chancellor Angela Merkel gave the go-ahead to discuss direct aid for Spain’s banks, Irish negotiators were told from the outset of the talks that any pledge to Madrid would not necessarily create a precedent for Dublin. This led Taoiseach Enda Kenny to insist on a direct reference to Ireland, saying he could accept nothing less.

As the talks continued into the early hours of Friday morning, Mr Kenny is reputed to have instructed officials to “keep taking the tablets” as they pushed repeatedly for a direct reference to Ireland.

 

ECB Backed Ireland In Getting Pledge For Bank Bailout Review (Arthur Beesley and Harry McGee, Irish Times)

(Photocall Ireland)

The ECB has been caught red-handed trying to change the text of a speech of one of its executive board members in Ireland on Friday. Joerg Asmussen had originally said that:

“the main reasoning [for the repayment of unsecured bondholders of Irish banks] was to ensure that no negative spillover effects would be created to other Irish banks or to banks in other European Countries.”

However, the reference to “banks in other countries” was whitewashed from the full transcript that was later released online on the ECB website. Presumably the fact that Irish taxpayers’ money is being used to support the owners of private banks in foreign countries is too embarrassing to admit – even for the ECB.

ECB Caught Changing Embarrassing Transcript (Spreadbetting)

Irish Taxpayer Sacrificed to Prop Up Eurozone Banks – German ECB board Memeber Speaks Truth (Guido Fawkes Blog)

That proposed delay on the €3.1 billion cash payment due on March 31?

Not looking good.

More than six months after Dublin first raised the matter with the ECB, the Frankfurt-based institution is pushing back heavily against persistent Irish demands for a concession to ease the cost of rescuing the former Anglo Irish Bank.
Within the ECB, the view remains that alternative avenues are open to the Government to improve its finances, among them reductions in public sector pay and welfare entitlements.

The argument is made that average public pay and welfare levels in Ireland are higher than the average in some of the other euro zone countries that are supporting Ireland’s bailout, among them Spain, Slovenia and Slovakia.

Push to get debt burden reduced hits strong ECB resistance (Irish Times)

Meanwhile in other ‘Good Luck With That’ news:

Mario Draghi confident of Irish ‘Yes’ vote (RTE News)

pic