Tag Archives: Property Developers

This afternoon.

Leinster House, Dublin 2.

Sinn Féin spokesperson on Housing Eoin Ó Broin on the Plinth ahead of introducing legislation in the Dáil today that would remove the Part V affordable housing exemption for developers.

Housing Minister Darragh O’ Brien’s Housing For All plan includes measures to increase social and affordable homes in new developments from 10pc to 20pc – except, if a developer bought land between 2015 and 2021.

Leah Farrell/RollingNews

Previously: Developing Story

9035222390352229

Michael O’Flynn (top) and supporters Bill Cullen and Jackie Lavin outside the High Court this afternoon.

More to follow.

Previously: Down With The Kids

(Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland)

ofMichael O’Flynn

Last night, Cork property developer Michael O’Flynn was interviewed by Paschal Sheehy on the Six One News about losing control of his business to Blackstone, a US company which had purchased Mr O’Flynn’s loans from NAMA.

He said the following:

I was shocked. My intention was absolutely to work collaboratively with Blackstone. It has always been my policy, whoever local authorities, State agencies, the IDA. Whether you borrow a million, ten million or 1.8 billion it’s always about did you borrow responsibly? And I can tell you Paschal we have always borrowed responsibly. Of course we have had situations where there has been an extraordinary collapse in price, in value and no more than a householder who bought a house and is in negative equity. Like, are they responsible for the negative equity that they find themselves in? We have done our business right. We have always tried to do our business in a proper fashion, we will continue to do so.

Watch here.

Meanwhile…

chopperhouse

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxZ8eSNFyWw&start=656&end=942]

Michael O’Flynn featured in RTÉ’s Prime Time documentary ‘Carry On Regardless’ in December 2010 about the lifestyle of Irish property developers in NAMA, where he was filmed flying by helicopter with his family to Down Royal from his Cork home to watch his racehorse finish third.

Mr O’Flynn also received a reported €50,000 from Lucinda Creighton in a defamation case in the High Court in 2012, part of which he donated to Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin.

Fair play though, in fairness.

patrick-kellyGwan The Paddy.

…But in Ireland, we know that the British Virgin Islands has been a destination of choice for Irish property developers, as well as businessmen and women generally. After all, its (hitherto!) secrecy and tax regime have been attracting such titans of Irish business as the (Sean) Quinn family and Ray Grehan. A BVI registered company is after NAMAed Paddy Kelly [above], now in Florida. There is nothing illegal or untoward about incorporating BVI companies, but there are long-held suspicions that the secrecy provided by the BVI has been abused. You cannot generally find out the shareholders, directors or financial information of companies incorporated in the BVI, it’s all hidden behind nominees like BVI solicitors.
This leaking has changed all that.

 

(Some) Irish super-rich bricking it as secretive offshore haven leaks confidential information (NamWineLake)

Pic: ‘RedQuartz

Not them.

The developers.

Ian Kehoe (right), of The Sunday Business Post, appeared on RTE 1’s The Saturday Night Show with Brendan O’Connor (left) to discuss three debt-drenched former property moguls: Bernard McNamara, Derek Quinlan and Sean Dunne – and what they’re up to now.

It was sobering viewing.

Luckily we had a bit o’ smoke.

Brendan O’Connor: “We’re going to look at a few of the bigger players and the more colourful guys tonight. All of them – people who skipped the country.”

Ian Kehoe: “People, who’ve left the country.”

O’Connor: “OK. So. Starting with Bernard McNamara, who is he? Where did he come from?”

Kehoe: “Yeah, Bernard McNamara was I suppose ubiquitous during the boom. He was everywhere, from hotels to property plays all over the country. He invested and built and bought literally everything. He’s from Lisdoonvarna, in Clare, very close to Fianna Fail, served two terms as a councillor down in Clare, in Lisdoonvarna, ran for the Dáil, didn’t get it, moved to Dublin, picked up an awful of State work. But then, I suppose like an awful lot of builders, decided there was an awful lot of money to be made, developing the properties themselves. And that led him getting into things like The Shelbourne Hotel, The Conrad, Parknasilla down in Kerry, literally everywhere down the country he bought or built something.”

O’Connor: “OK. And then of course, probably very well known for being involved in the Glass Bottle site, that fiasco. But there was a, probably his most ambitious project is a thing that a lot of people might know about and that’s being involved, basically taking over parts of the city centre in Dublin.”

Kehoe: “Absolutely, it is. It was probably kind of his grand plan, but he never came out and said it. Essentially, he snapped up dozens and dozens of properties in Grafton Street, in around the Westbury area of Grafton Street [Dublin]. And his idea was to create a brand new thoroughfare, right through that area onto George’s Street, full of shops, apartments, residential areas, cinemas, hotels. And, literally, if you look on NAMA’s list of receiverships, you will just literally see scores of various Bernard McNamara properties. Little houses, shops. And his grand plan was literally to buy everything, to go right down the middle. Now all of those properties are for sale in the great asset sell-off.
O’Connor: “OK. So Bernard McNamara is all his stuff basically in NAMA now?”

Kehoe: “A large, a large chunk of it is.”

O’Connor: “How much did he end up owing?”

Kehoe: “He owes NAMA, through the various banks, €1.5billion. And another €500million to various, non-NAMA banks, which would bring him in at about €2billion all told.”

O’Connor: “OK. Now, he is now bankrupt, yes?”

Kehoe: “Yeah, I suppose, he followed an awful lot of people. He went to London and at the start of November, declared bankrupt in the London courts. I suppose it’s a different type of bankruptcy then an awful lot of people might associate with in Ireland. He’s living in a house, for example, in London that costs £6,000 sterling a month, in a little gated community, you have to press an intercom bell to get in. He’s also establishing himself in the property market, and set up a company. He’s also doing a lot of consultancy work in Nigeria, in Lagos of all places. And there are some reports he’s doing some stuff in South Africa.”

O’Connor: “So life goes on for Bernard. And we’re not going to see any of our billion and a half or much of it…?”

Kehoe: “Well, essentially, he walks away from the debts, in one year’s time, next November, he’ll walk away with a clean slate. And free to start again.”

O’Connor: “OK. Derek Quinlan, different kettle of fish to a lot of these guys was Derek Quinlan. He was a tax inspector and then became a kind of financial guru to the great and the good?”

Kehoe: “Yeah, he was a kind of poacher-turned-gamekeeper, I suppose. Got out of the Revenue Commissioners as a special investigator and started assembling syndicates of high net-worth individuals. And he’d gather up the money and then he’d invest them in tax-driven property plays. So he’d started off in Ireland, financing things like car parks and hotels and small things. But his ambitions grew and he literally looked around the world and saw some of the biggest, most fantastic property plays and followed through with them. In 2008, he spent €1.8 billion of his own and his investors’ money buying a building, the Santander building in Spain. He outbid Saudi princes for The Savoy and The Connacht Hotel, over in London. Literally, billions, big ticket stuff.

O’Connor: “OK. So big, international prestige kind of stuff. And I suppose unlike a lot of the guys aswell, he was using a lot of punters’ money, like not just bankers’ and there was some well-known people in there.”

Kehoe: “Absolutely, I mean his client list was like the who’s who of Ireland. You had everyone from, over the years, people like Moya Doherty, JOhn McColgan, of Riverdance, invested in him. An awful of people, Gay Byrne, Pat Kenny invested an awful lot of money with them.”

O’Connor: “And have all those people lost their money now?

Kehoe: “Well a certain amount, I saw Pat Kenny recently came out and said he had certainly taken a bit of a hiding in it. And others have aswell, I suppose like everything, you invest in property, it’s not a one-way bet. But certainly the scale of the ambition of what he was doing was unprecedented in Irish terms.”

O’Connor: “So if you buy buildings for €1.5billion and this, how much does he owe now?”

Kehoe: “His total ownings…He was numero uno when the loans got transferred to NAMA. Debts linked to him, and associated with him, totalled…”

O’Connor: “The syndicates…”

Kehoe: “Yeah, the syndicates, that all went wrong, was €3billion. His personal quote of that was about €600million. In an effort to get back some of that money, NAMA appointed receivers, over nine or ten of his properties, including a place in Shrewsbury Road. I mean it was always said you were somebody in Ireland if you had that Shrewsbury Road property. Derek Quinlan had three of them, which will give you a scale of what he was up to.”

O’Connor: “And, but Derek Quinlan, in fairness to him I suppose, is attempting to pay back the money, he hasn’t gone into bankruptcy.”

Kehoe: “No, no, he has left Ireland. He’s based between an idyllic hamlet over in Switzerland and a £20,000-a-month house over in London. But he is selling assets continually and paying down his debts. So I think he’s paid off his, somewhere close to €2billion in an effort to, you know, restructure his finances. But he’s said himself, his own personal finances at this stage are very precarious. And he is being bankrolled by various people who took a shine to him.”

O’Connor: “The Barclay brothers and all that. I want to ask you about one particular asset of his which was incredible. That house in Cap Ferrat. We’ve a picture of it there. It’s amazing. That house was originally bought for how much? Or how much did he buy it for?”

Kehoe: “It was €40million or €50million. It was ultimately sold at a massive discount, in around €13million or €14million, when he eventually went to sell it.”

O’Connor: “And that was just his own gaff for when he went on holidays.”

Kehoe: “That was it. Literally, he had a portfolio in the South of France. I don’t think you had a picture of it there. But he had a fabulous yacht, stationed not too far away from that, he had phenomenal properties over in London. He still has them. Houses all around Ireland. He literally lived the high life. It was very interesting. I suppose one of the defining quotes in the boom, it was put to him ‘Given the scale of his debts, in a court action in London, of which he was a third-party to and how come he was able to maintain such an extravagant lifestyle, looks directly back at the lawyer and said ‘Well, extravagance is an unusual term. What’s extravagant to one, mightn’t be extravagant to me.’ So that was his take on his own thing.”

O’Connor: “Not bad for a fella who came from the tax office.”

Kehoe: “Absolutely.”

O’Connor: “We’ll move to Sean Dunne, Dunner. Of course Gayle and Sean were of course held up as the poster couple of the boom and all that. Tell us about that.”

Kehoe: “Yeah, they certainly were. They were high-profile. Sean Dunne, from Tullow, started off working on sites, but he moved fast, very quickly, beyond all of that. I mean he will forever be known with spending €375million buying up two sites in Ballsbridge in Dublin 4.”

Later

O’Connor: “So listen, between the three of those say, that’s just three and you know, there’s so many other huge guys who haven’t been mentioned, the Johnny Ronans…Those three, how much do those three owe the State, through NAMA? How much are their debts?”

Kehoe: “All told their debts are about €6billion. And then the NAMA portion of that would be €4.5bn to €5bn.”

O’Connor: “OK. So, bigger than an austerity budget.”

Kehoe: “Well bigger than the adjustments. We heard all about the biting cuts and the austerity in the last budget. And that was €3.5billion. But to get that sort of money back. I mean, it just puts it into context. The mammoth borrowings that all of these guys had.”

O’Connor: “Of course, we’re not getting it back.”

Kehoe: “No. I don’t think so. I mean, even best-case scenario, if you look at it, €72 billion transferred to NAMA, €62 billion of that, €62 billion of that alone was from 180 borrowers. That’s roughly what you’d have at medium-sized country wedding. So the next time you’re at that wedding, look around and say to yourself ‘these are the NAMA people who owe €62 billion. Best case scenario, of that €62billion, we get back €25 billion.”

Watch here

And much more besides.

Yesterday NAMA chairman Frank Daly (above) spoke to Vincent Browne (top) on foot of the release of NAMA’s 2011 annual report in which NAMA said it made a profit of €247million for 2011.

Vincent Browne: “Properties originally valued at €74billion were transferred to NAMA and NAMA paid €31.8billion for those loans and assets. What are they worth now?”

Frank Daly: “What they’re worth now, on our books, is probably about €27-€28billion. That takes account of properties that we have sold obviously in the past two and a half years. Put it also takes account of impairment charge provisioning that we have done over the last two years. We’ve done the impairment charge simply because property prices have continued to deteriorate and it’s only correct that we should actually make provision for that. Our approach to that has been quite conservative, quite prudent because we want to be as objective as we can about the figures that are in our accounts. And, you know we operate under IFRS and those accounts are audited. The impairment provision is rigorously evaluated by ourselves, by our own auditors and by our external auditors.”

Browne: “So there’s a loss of about €4 billion. At least. According to your figures.”

Daly: “On the books there is a loss of about €4billion.”

….later

Browne: “We were told that when NAMA was set up that developers would be pursued for every last penny. That we’d get back the €70 billion that we owed or as close to it as possible – not just the €31.4 billion or whatever or €31.8billion that NAMA paid for the properties but the whole lot. Now we hear that ‘No, no, NAMA isn’t bothered about going after every last penny. It merely wants to cover the funds that it paid for these properties. And let the banks, which are largely owned by the people of Ireland, let them suffer the losses.”

Daly: “No, NAMA is realistic, right? We have never said that we would not pursue everything and we still say that to the greatest extent that we can, that we will pursue every penny. But we’re also realistic enough to know that at the end of the day, you know, we pay 31.8 billion for those loans on the basis that that’s the value of the assets backing them up, the securities backing them up. So that’s the sort of bottom line figure. That’s the one we are very definite we’ll collect and is realistic to collect.”

Browne: “You mean that you’re hoping to collect.”

Daly: “Well it’s more than hope.”

Browne: “As of now you’re saying there’s a deficit of about €4 billion?”

Daly: “This is based on analysis, this is based on our strategic planning. This is based on the very rigorous granular evaluation of our portfolio that I just talked about. Will we get more than the €31.8billion? Will we pursue the whole €74? It’s our intention to pursue as much as we can but I mean it would be disingenuous for me to sit here and say to you, or say to anybody, that we’re going to get back the €74 figure, we’re not.”

Browne: “Frank, you’ve given the impression to several of the developers who lost a fortune on these things that you’re really only looking for the amount that NAMA paid.”

Daly: “No, no, sorry.”

Browne: “I got that impression.”

Daly: “No, if you were in here at meetings with developers…”

Browne: “I’d love to. Are you inviting us in, wha’?”

Daly: “I’m not inviting third parties yet. We don’t need a referee right now. They would tell you that all our focus is still on getting as much as we possibly can. But I have to be realistic. NAMA has to be realistic, you know. If the €74 billion were recoverable, you know, there wouldn’t really be a need for NAMA in the first place. You could have just left the whole thing out there with the banks and eventually it would come back. We’re realistic, but rigorous. We’ll chase what we possibly can.”

Browne: “How many of the developers, in respect of the people you’ve been dealing with. How many have you forced to redress property transfers? In other words a lot of them have transferred property to their spouses..And how many of them have you gone after and insisted properties be transferred back?”

Daly: “It’s one of the main focuses of every, of discussion of every business plan of every debtor, you know? What did you transfer in the last five years, seven years, eight years? Was it transferred with a view to taking it away from NAMA? And, if so, bring it back, right. We have brought back between, actual returns of property and charges we have got over property, something like half a billion to date. And I expect that there is a bit more to come there yet. And that’s from a variety of developers because we won’t do business with them. We won’t do business with them unless they bring back assets they transferred.”

Browne: “But you’re doing business with a lot of developers and you’re paying them a lot of money – in some instances up to €200,000 a year, you’re promising them bonuses, there’s a chance they might get their properties back – this isn’t what we were told would happen.”

Daly: “Well, first of all, we’re not, we’re paying three people or indeed, we’re allowing three people out of the overheads of their businesses to take salaries of €200,000 a year. In each of those cases, those individuals are managing now for NAMA, for the taxpayer portfolios worth a billion, a billion and a half, two billion.”

Browne: “Why should we be paying someone €200,000 – people who contributed to the wrecking of the economy. What are we doing paying them €200,000 a year?”

Daly: “It’s a very valid question. And I, and my colleagues in NAMA, would ask ourselves the same question. But, you know, at the end of the day, we’re a commercial organisation. We have to get the best financial return we can for the taxpayer. And we, everyday, have to ask ourselves what decision do we make that actually does that, that gets that. And in the case of these developers who are managing their businesses, who know their business, grew up with the business, made some spectacular mistakes along the way. But if we take the view that they are in the best place to work it out to the benefit of the taxpayer and if we take the view that they will cooperate with us then we allow them to take a salary. I don’t think anybody likes it, you don’t like it, I don’t think the public likes it, I don’t particularly like it but it’s a practical, commercial decision.”

Browne: “Somebody has said that NAMA has become the train driver of the greatest gravy train ever in terms of the fees you’re paying accountants, many of them whom were accountants and auditors of the banks. The fees you’re paying solicitor firms, many of which were also advising many of the developers and some of the banks. The fees you’re paying barristers, estate agents and all of that. What do you say to that?”

Daly: “I say two things. First of all we pay fees because we have to pay fees. We need legal advice, we need accounting advice, we need taxation advice. The alternative is that we create a massive quango in NAMA by employing loads of people in those disciplines. And in a lot of those areas, we only need those skills on a temporary basis. So certainly while last year and the year before, as we were bringing the loans across and doing legal due diligence, we would have paid out a lot in fees for legal and accountancy services. That is in some way non-recurring costs and some of it will not be there in the future. As to who we employ, you know, we go through a public procurement exercise, we get the best competitive rates we can. At the end of the day though we need the best advice we can get.”

Daly later admitted the average pay for 214 NAMA staff members is €103,000.

Previously: So You Saw Harry Crosbie On The Saturday Night Show, Right?

Nama’s Blind Side

Suspicion Lingers Over The True Financial Condition Of Nama (NamaWineLake)