Safe And Effective

at

Last night.this morning

Pfizer report here

Sponsored Link

Related posts:

OK, Youngsters Follow The Scientists Lab Leak ‘Kid-Sized Doses’

123 thoughts on “Safe And Effective”

    2. Nialler

      To be fair, I looked like George Clooney before the vaccine now I look like Chet from Weird Science but hey ho, such is life.

  3. Broadbag

    That’s a fairly hysterical way to present data, but no, it’s the MSM that’s obsessed with stoking fear, not the ‘critical thinkers’, right?

  4. Conor O'Kelly

    It’s been a while since I looked at broadsheet but I always thought it was a fairly benign news source. When did it go full gutter press? This is a nonsense news story, easily fact checked and debunked. This is dangerous use of the platform and highly irresponsible.

          2. John

            I have had my boosters now I suggest you display a little journalistic integrity by using a little bit of basic journalism before recycling old discredited nonsense from twitter

          3. Johnny

            If they had the slightest understanding of Canada and USA they would have know,there was no chance of a similar protest,for a start the highways are completely different,the states did not have anything like the restrictions in the provinces,the ones that did have now lifted them.

            But keep on trucking that fake news.

          1. johnny

            what report ?
            A FOI request was made.
            FDA under a judge’s order fast tracked the data release.
            which you have now weaponized to fear monger.

          2. The Millie Obnoxious™

            To fact check. I would assume there is a certain amount of due diligence done before posting.

            Perhaps I’m wrong. In which case, more fool me because I had a better opinion of you than that.

    2. John

      BS has lost all journalistic integrity and promoting such anti vaccination garbage may have led to fatalities and long term sickness and suffering amongst the gullible. Shame on BS and its flag wavers!

    3. K.Cavan

      Get back to cutting off some unmarried mothers from their welfare entitlements, Conor.

    4. E'Matty

      How exactly are these 8-9 pages of adverse reactions fake, could you tell us? Are these forged documents and not actually from the FOI release? More detail on your debunking please?

    1. Cian

      Agnieszka Solberg MD @AgnesSolberg
      Replying to @ShannonJoyRadio
      The first thing on this list is a genetic abnormality that someone is born with. I think you don’t understand what this list actually represents.

  6. John

    Once again BS pushing its hysterical anti vaccination nonsense for the gullible conspiracy theorists who infest the site.

    It’s about time that BS would display a slight amount of journalistic integrity before promoting recycled garbage from twitter.

    It’s over BS, you have lost your hysterical propaganda war against science, simple common sense and basic human decency. The entire medical and scientific community along with the now worldwide billions of recipients of vaccines who care about their fellow mankind have metaphorically given the two fingers to the hyper gullible conspiracy theorists that you regurgitate the inane anti vaccination crap for.

    https://factcheck.afp.com/http%253A%252F%252Fdoc.afp.com%252F9UC4LE
    “Articles inaccurately claim document reveals Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine deaths”

      1. Bodger

        tom2, john’s ‘fact check’ refers to the second tweet. The main tweet and report are ready for your debunking.

        1. Nigel

          Bodger likes to make sure the lies their halfway-around-the-world head start before the truth gets out of bed. That’s what balanxce is.

        3. tom2

          You’re the one who posted the second tweet which is usually your gotcha moment. In your head at least.

    2. Johnny

      ….I’m waiting for the US Trucker convoy update,via a Australian twitter account,how they cover that is a good example of the US “news” coverage on here. Fake videos were posted and hosted on here yesterday as “news”, of trucks driving on highways in the “convoy”,by the ‘sheet for what purpose.

      The trucker convoy was scheduled arrive in DC yesterday,but the sheet hosted fake videos of trucks in Texas,on their way…..

      “A rally on the Washington Monument grounds Tuesday to support trucker convoys has drawn a minuscule crowd so far. About 20 people are in attendance, Washingtonian photographer Evy Mages reports from the scene, as well as a similar number of people who are there to cover the event.“

      No way.

      “If you look at some of the trucker convoy chats on Telegram, you’ll see a lot more discussion of conspiracy theories and QAnon references than constitutional arguments. Many people on those forums, Vice reports, have complained that the war in Ukraine has vacuumed up all their attention.“

      https://www.washingtonian.com/2022/03/01/the-pro-trucker-convoy-rally-is-another-failure-for-far-right-demonstrators-in-dc/

    3. K.Cavan

      It’s just totally obvious what you are, John, you can’t help but expose yourself, go away, you government goon.

      1. jungleman

        Haha you are a paranoiac with delusions of grandeur. The government definitely does not care what people like you fill your days with.

    4. Duncan Wheeler

      You should checkout factcheck.afp.com. They’re are a notoriously mainstream faker of factcheck info. All one was traffic and utterly unreliable. “Facts are lazy, facts are late. facts all come with a point of view, facts never do what you want them to” Paraphrasing Talking Heads.

  7. U N M U T U A L

    It’s safe to assume Putin isn’t on that list of side effects…

    Otherwise it’d be all over the front pages.

      1. bisted

        …luckily sleepy Joe was showing the symptoms long before the pandemic or the ratlickers would have appropriated him…they would called it narcolepsy though…wait…

  8. Conor O'Kelly

    This is disappointing. The editors / publishers may have issues with the covid measures and vaccination campaign but there is responsibility in publishing and disseminating information to a large platform. This goes beyond journalism to issues of basic moral and ethical standards.

    So whatever the personal position of the editors / publishers they must set that aside and only publish that which they can reasonably verify as truthful and accurate.

    This ‘story’ is manifestly false – it should be retracted, otherwise this website cannot claim any journalistic legitimacy.

    1. Bodger

      The nine pages of adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine was news to me. In fact it was only released yesterday. Had you seen them before you had your shots?

      1. Conor O'Kelly

        Hi Bodger,
        The tweet republished above claims that there were 1223 deaths from 42000 subjects in a study of the Pfizer vaccine.
        This is presented as a revelation linked to the release of the Pfizer data.
        The claim and the link are both untrue.
        To focus on adverse reactions at this point is disingenuous and you have edited the article after the above comments to focus on that information.

        Many, many Irish people have had this vaccine, so to misrepresent facts like this would be quite frightening for people.

        2. Bodger

          ‘The figure of 1,223 fatalities among 158,893 adverse effects reflect “spontaneous” reports from sources that include health officials in several countries, without any verification of the cause, among the millions of vaccinated people worldwide during that period, Pfizer spokeswoman Dervila Keane told AFP. It does not indicate specific causes of death, and the fatalities may include people with “various illnesses” such as cancer or cardiovascular disease, she said.’

          Right so.

          1. Conor O'Kelly

            Hi Bodger,
            I appreciate the removal of the tweet but please do the same on twitter. This image from the deleted tweet is being used to link to this story from the broadsheet account.
            Please take a moment to understand the position of people that you don’t agree with – there is a huge amount of scientific and qualitative support for the evidence that people are dying because they are scared of vaccines. This is a very significant problem around the world and is certainly going to continue for a long time.
            I understand your have a great faith in your position but there is huge responsibility on you to be sure that what you publish is accurate and truthful. Peoples lives actually depend on it.

        3. White Dove

          I thought everyone who read this site was well aware of the potential risks with the vaccine as they kept complaining about Broadsheet and others warning about them? If you know about them already what are you getting so upset for about this post? If you didn’t know about them already, well, then, you haven’t been reading Broadsheet properly. Take your issues up with RTE etc. Seems like a case of shoot the messenger to me.

          2. Bodger

            Short of physically apprehending them from the vaccine stations I’m not sure there was any more we could have done.

    2. John

      Hi Conor, You are perfectly correct.

      If BS had a shred of moral, ethical and journalistic integrity it would cease promoting anti scientific discredited anti vaccination nonsense.

      1. Johnny

        ….you have a childish cartoonish relationship to truckers based on old Burt Reynolds’s movies,it’s pathetic as truckers are diversified and in no way do you reflect that reality,it’s all such a cliche and clownish.

        2. johnny

          ah gwan,hit with some those old tired hackneyed drug war cliches.

          you have attempted frame the truckers as peace and freedom luving,fun and good natured using ‘smokey and the bandit’ imagery,it is extremely disingenuous,giving a false impression and just bad for this site’s credibility.

      2. scottser

        hey bodger – this is your name in russian: Боджер
        it’s got a bit of a ring to it, eh?

      4. Nigel

        ‘That goes for Conor and Nigel too.’

        in terms of ‘Bodger’s attitude as moral compass,’ that seems about right.

    3. K.Cavan

      What grade are you, Conor? EO, I’d say, you don’t sound intelligent enough to be APO or PO?

    5. White Dove

      Conor, I’m not sure there’s such a thing as journalistic legitimacy at the moment. Indeed I’m not sure if there was ever such a thing. Shaming words are so 2021 and need to be really original to be worth scrolling past.

  10. Gavin

    Wow a lot of name-calling in here…very little in the way of actual rebuttals. Think Id agree with Conor though… “reasonably verify as truthful and accurate.”

  11. Johnny

    False.
    Fake.
    Misleading.
    Fear mongering.

    None none this is true,it was a FOI request.

    “The FDA Agreed To A 75 Year Timeline To Release Pfizer’s Data…

    A Federal Judge Said No… You Have 8 Months…“

    “…. In response to the FOIA request, the FDA had previously said that it takes approximately eight minutes per page to process records for a FOIA request, and that it could only review and release 500 pages a month, which is 6,000 pages a year.

    At that rate, it would take 75 years to release all the data………”

    There was NO 75 years agreement with Pfizer – NONE

    https://www.fdanews.com/articles/206113-federal-judge-tells-fda-it-must-make-public-55000-pages-a-month-of-pfizer-vaccine-data

  12. GiggidyGoo

    So many people with problems with BS.
    The rubber bus will be along shortly to take yiz away.
    In the meantime, how about posting your comments on the RTE, Indo, Times websites?

    1. SOQ

      I have a sneaky suspicion that Broadsheet.ie has sneakily sold shares to these people and that is why they spend so much time here complaining about content and comments.

      Either that or they are paid shills or bots, because if the content was so objectional most people would just lose interest and move on.

      1. johnny

        look around,they have,just a few who actually happen like John are still around,it will be all yours very soon.

      2. jungleman

        Translation: “Anyone who disagrees with me is only doing so because they are being paid to”.

        You have a very large ego.

        1. SOQ

          Not at all- just asking the obvious. There are plenty of other sites towing the Pharma line so why keep coming back to complain on this one if the editorial policy is so distasteful?

          1. jungleman

            Because the irresponsible behavior of people like ‘Bodger’ should be called out.

  13. SailorGerry

    The jabs appear to alter the human DNA in as little as 6 hours according to tests done invitro on human liver cells.

    Tie that in with the fact that various public health agencies are no longer going to report Covid death and injury by vax status as the data now shows a negative correlation with being jabbed.

    Or the massive under reporting of injuries and side effects as a direct result of the clot shots.

    From a risk management perspective, with a virus that 99% of folks survive, I made an informed choice not to partake in the experiment and am comfortable with my choice.

    Each to their own.

    https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm?s=09

  14. TenPin Terry

    I’ve had my fourth shot already – picked it up at a walk-in pharmacy on my way through London to this sun-drenched holiday island.
    By having an old NHS number I’ve been able to play both health systems and get protection in Blighty as well as Ireland – the first shot was two months ahead of when I would have got it in Ireland.
    You can never be too sure about where you might pick up the dreaded lurgy so I’m rammed to the gunwhales with Vitamin D3(4,000iu), Zinc tablets the size of a paving slab and a flu shot.
    No adverse reactions yet apart from growing a breast on the side of my head.
    Gives Mrs TenPin endless hours of fun so not all bad.
    Wahaay™

      1. ThreeTit Terry

        Take it away son.
        I rather like the moniker.
        ThreeTit Terry.
        Has a great ring to it.
        Marvellous™

    2. GiggidyGoo

      Sure Have Inferiority Troubles meter has ramped up quickly, now at 88%. Walter Mitty strikes again.

      1. TenPin Terry

        How you must be suffering now that you can’t use your Joe F username again without becoming a figure of ridicule. If only you’d been more circumspect …

        Hehx3™

          1. TenPin Terry

            About the same number of functioning brain cells that you possess so only in single figures.
            Now your sidekick Papi has gone Dumb and Dumber is reduced to just and Dumber.
            And Dumber it is then…

          2. scottser

            so multiple username guy calls out other multiple username guy for having multiple usernames?
            gotcha.

          5. TenPin Terry

            Wednesday is margarita day at TenPin Villa.
            Tequila and Cointreau in equal measure and two shots of fresh lime.
            Always shaken vigorously by Mrs TenPin as she knows I like to watch those bikini-clad puppies make a dash for freedom.
            I like a salt rim too but sadly my BP doesn’t.
            Still, mustn’t complain.
            Needs must.
            How’s your day going And Dumber ?

          6. scottser

            not bad thanks, three-tit.
            i’ve got a nice valpolicella ripasso superiore in the decanter for later. here at casa scottser we call it ‘winesday’.
            sláinte.

  15. SOQ

    Covid-1984 @Orwells_Ghost_ is 100% correct- it is an item of record that Pfizer and the FDC asked the judge for a 75 year ban on the release of these papers.

    And not a single person who is huffing and puffing and deflecting to beat the band is asking the most obvious question- why?

    Did people not have a right to know what the known injury risks of this rushed experimental gene therapy actually were? Whatever happened to informed consent? And that is not even considering the fact that there is no medium let alone long term safety data.

    This is criminality on a mind boggling scale- especially as so many people were bullied and coerced into taking them.

    1. johnny

      ” it is an item of record that Pfizer and the FDC asked the judge for a 75 year ban on the release of these papers.”

      what record ?
      where.

      (Pittman, from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Fort Worth Division, is a 2019 appointee of President Trump.)

        1. johnny

          how are you processing your only ever ‘telly rant getting binned,hope you are not internalizing it,all your post’s are so angry,all the time,have you chatted with anyone about it getting cancelled ?

          ps-get the carpet cleaned,its looks like a NY dive bar after paddys day.

    2. Cian

      That is more misinformation.

      As Johnny said above:
      “…. In response to the FOIA request, the FDA had previously said that it takes approximately eight minutes per page to process records for a FOIA request, and that it could only review and release 500 pages a month, which is 6,000 pages a year.

      At that rate, it would take 75 years to release all the data………”

      https://www.fdanews.com/articles/206113-federal-judge-tells-fda-it-must-make-public-55000-pages-a-month-of-pfizer-vaccine-data

      1. SOQ

        So they can review the actual documents prior to emergency authorisation at a rate hundreds of times faster than they can release them?

        And even at that, those work projections were on existing staff numbers. Given the severity of the situation, i.e. people dying or getting seriously injured, recruiting more people is not an unreasonable request.

        Which they have now done of course- because they were forced to.

        1. Cian

          Yes. In Ireland most government departments (of 1000s) have a small team of 2 or 3 responsible for FOI. It is not unusual that there would be more people working on the authorisation side over the FOI side.

          How will reviewing documents for FOI more quickly stop people dying or getting seriously injured?

          1. SOQ

            And they’d rather go to court and fight tooth and nail instead. How many people would the cost of that stunt employed? There is misinformation Cian- and it is you spouting it.

            Given even the list of now known injuries- what percentage of people would have lined up, if they had known?

            Jail them- and throw away the key.

            At the very least set up a proper injury compensation system without the usual foot-dragging so that those poor people can pay their living and care costs.

          2. johnny

            ” it is an item of record that Pfizer and the FDC asked the judge for a 75 year ban on the release of these papers.”

            what record ?

            where.

            put up or shut up.

          3. K.Cavan

            I’ll tell you what, SOQ, Cian has never made a single truthful or accurate post on this site. Whether fake news or just his own insane speculation, everything he’s ever posted is utter gibberish.
            Try this, Cian, register under another name, I’ll spot your posts, immediately.

          5. andrew

            “put up or shut up”

            Unfortunately, he will do neither. He will simply pop up, jazz hands galore on another thread posting more lies. What’s most remarkable is that he is the single most active commenter on this site posting multitudes of unsubstantiated rubbish with a clear agenda – yet accuses others of being paid shills. This SOQ character deserves the animosity he receives.

          6. johnny

            can you read SOQ-cut and paste the paart about the so called FDA/Pfizer agreement to withhold data for 75 years,where does it state that like you claim?

            again with the ‘drugs’ no SOQ,i work for a living unlike you,what you working on these days,more yank ‘news’ garbage from far right fringe sites in USA ?

            PUT UP
            or
            SHUT UP

          7. Micko

            Why does SOQ and Bodger etc annoy you all so much?

            Everyone who wanted to be vax’d is, so what’s the problem.

            Omicron has made this whole thing moot anyway. Bill Gates even called it “a natural vaccine”. I believe that was the wording.

            What harmful misinformation are they spreading? Who are they harming Just ignore them. Your annoyance makes no sense.

            Unless you think they might have a point…

          8. TenPin Terry

            Micko, I often think you and I are the only sensible ones on here.
            The same suspects work themselves up into a sweaty lather over a myriad of different topics day in day out.
            Nigel seems to have this effect on people too.
            Just chill people.
            Disagree but leave the insults to those who really deserve it.
            You know who I’m talking about …

          9. Nigel

            ‘Why does SOQ and Bodger etc annoy you all so much?’

            In a comment section on a news site, talking about major news stories, why are you bothered by people who have a higher standard for truth and accuracy than Bodger or SOQ?

          10. Micko

            I’m not Nigel. And I’m not even talking about you – in fairness, you’re tame, civil and measured in your responses. Are as most on here.

            It’s more the anger from some of the others. It makes no sense now.

            And as Terry says above – they know who they are. ;)

          11. SOQ

            Does anyone know what question that abusive idiot is actually asking? Is he saying that the court did not rule against the 75 year ban?

          12. johnny

            you have be the loudest mouthiest most abusive troll on here.
            show the class where Pfizer was part the FOI request or the court case?
            hint-link is above.
            No
            It
            Is
            Not
            your words.
            ..” it is an item of record that Pfizer and the FDC asked the judge for a 75 year ban on the release of these papers…”

          13. SOQ

            The FOI was made by a group of scientists and it was the FDA who requested the year ban- better? But, given that it was Pfizer who done the actual testing- it is highly unlikely that the FDA held all such documents.

            As for accusing others of being abusive- if that is what you think then I suggest you seek help- genuinely. There is rarely a day goes by that you are not fighting with someone, and your abusive behaviour has been absolutely disgraceful.

          14. johnny

            ..eh,duh,ehm…

            “Covid-1984 @Orwells_Ghost_ is 100% correct- it is an item of record that Pfizer and the FDC asked the judge for a 75 year ban on the release of these papers.”

            …is 100% wrong-it is NOT an item of record……

            there fixed it for ya.

  17. CJ

    I thought the scooby doo ending was yesterday?: putin is unmasked as the villian behind the scary stories.
    in case it’s still confusing: anti vax is a con.

  18. Duncan Wheeler

    Large amount of rude name calling shills on here today. What a lot of nasty minded tossers. It’s hard not to just starve them of oxygen (response). Don’t waste you time engaging with them. I’m starting now.

  19. SailorGerry

    Article linked below explains the concerted effort to vilify and prevent the use of alternative early treatments for Covid 19. Emergency use authorization is contingent on no other safe and effective treatments being available, hence the massive campaign against, Ivermectin, HCQ, and supplements like Quercetin, taken with zinc, C and D. Some folks made millions in big pharma and quite a few died needlessly as they were denied medications that work in a large percentage of cases.

    https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/full/

Comments are closed.

Broadsheet.ie