‘After 12 days from the first vaccination of the AstraZeneca vaccine, you are 100% effective against hospitalisation and death’@sara_kayat shares this amazing statistic with us, which you may not have heard yet. pic.twitter.com/jW5uElTk2F
— This Morning (@thismorning) January 4, 2021
January 4, 2021.
ITV’s This Morning.
Meanwhile…
‘It’s important we remind parents the JCVI have looked into all of the data… The risks are extremely low.’
GP Dr Sara Kayat discusses Covid jabs being offered to children aged between 5 and 11 from next week.
🖥 GB News on YouTube: https://t.co/Wa58gYGZwF pic.twitter.com/1I7kfus8i4
— GB News (@GBNEWS) March 30, 2022
This morning.
GB News.
Good times.
Sponsored Link
#bangsitintohiscellulite
if your kid has cellulite you’re doing it wrong
Yes- the risks of CoVid-19 to children aged between 5 and 11 are extremely low. Nearly as low as injecting them with an experiential gene therapy with no medium of long term safety data- but not quite.
I see you’re still spouting crap as usual. Tosser.
” vaccine … 100% effective against hospitalisation and death”
How did that work out?
And who could possibly give that doctor the time of day after that one?
“after 12 days”. More like *for* 12 days – she forgot to mention that bit.
Anonymous trolls on the internet hurling abuse on a subject they no nothing about shocker.
‘hurling abuse’
Yes, we’ve noticed how much you hate that sort of thing.
Nigel. Do you believe the statements made by this doctor in either video above are reasonable statements for a trained medical practitioner to make, given all that is known about the virus and the vaccines?
I read your posts Nigel, and think – That’s the sperm that won?
The first statement is obviously wrong. So far as I know the second statement is correct.
Nigel, so you endorse a call for 5-11 year olds to be vaccinated? I should add, the statements in each video are not confined to just the quoted text in the Tweets. If so, why?
I certainly think the vaccines should be available for those age groups, at parental discretion. There are children in vulnerable categories or with immediate family in vulnerable categories, for one thing.
Wow. SOQ finally admits that the risk of CoVid-19 to children aged between 5 and 11 is higher than the risk from the vaccine.
Is there something inherently up with these types of liars? Same school as O’Neill and Kelly. Same demeanour. Same peddling of lies.
Follow the money
Mr. T. always… The viewer should be informed if there is any conflict of interest, direct or through family. Due diligence, who is she, who is paying this ad?
Wow 100% could she be sued if someone gets covid and dies in hospital after being vaccinated?
Either media hungry attention seekers, or just plain poop at their day job and need extra income.
Not much attention to be had on Gbeebies.
ours have had it so many times, a vaccine is redundant at this stage.
But don’t you find it strange that these people would argue that it is not?
Not a single one of them will say that natural immunity is better.
GB news. The perfect station for Trump fans ans BS commentators. All talk, but can’t debate, never rely when called out, only respond with stupid nicknames.
Says the bot who never actually engages in any discussion or debate on the issues, just flings poo at others. Even Nigel attempts to engage on the issues. You have all the hallmarks of a paid for commenter.
“natural immunity is better.”
What kind of idiot thinks that “getting infected to stop you getting infected” is a good idea? Apart from SOQ
The shots reprogram both the adaptive and the innate immune response, which is a terrible idea and leads on to ADE.
The brainwashing has been staggering to get an 80% jab rate, with an experimental gene therapy, which has no long term testing and has already harmed more than all other drugs combined in the last 20 years.
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-bnt162b2-mrna-vaccine-against?s=r
UK to stop publishing data that suggest COVID vaccines are ineffective
UK data indicates vaccines are ineffective against infection, and unboostered are worse off than the unvaccinated for protection against hospitalization and death
Negative efficacy means that proportionally, the vaccinated are testing positive for COVID more than the unvaccinated, in some cases by 100% to 300%. The figures are ‘normalized’ to balance the fact that there are many more people who are vaccinated.
https://aflds.org/news/post/uk-to-stop-publishing-data-that-suggest-vaccines-are-ineffective/
The boosters are associated with fewer hospitalizations and deaths, but that first and second doses alone are correlated with more hospitalizations and deaths. It is only a matter of time before the same will happen to the first boosted and a second will be needed.
There is actually talk of fifth jab now- I kid you not.
LOL. More fake news.
Tell us again about Israel and their vaccination rates. What are they again? What percentage got the original 2 doses?
They can tell you them selves, some of them at least.
https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/
Kate looks well after the Jamaica fiasco.
oh no.
say it ain’t so,
can’t be.
…Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19…
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869