Known Outcomes

at

Last night.

Further to the release by court order of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data…

…Via Daily Exposé:

One of the documents contained in the Pfizer data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’.  Page 12 of the confidential document contains data on the use of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection in pregnancy and lactation.

Pfizer state in the document that by 28th February 2021 there were 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during pregnancy.

One-hundred-and-forty-six of those mother cases did not immediately report the immediate occurrence of any clinical adverse event. But 124 of the 270 mother cases did. Meaning 46% of the mothers exposed to the Pfizer Covid-19 injection suffered an adverse reaction.

Of those 124 mothers suffering an adverse reaction, 49 were considered non-serious adverse reactions, whereas 75 were considered serious. This means 58% of the mothers who reported suffering adverse reactions suffered a serious adverse event ranging from uterine contraction to foetal death.

There were 34 outcomes altogether at the time of the report, but 5 of them were still pending. Pfizer note that only 1 of the 29 known outcomes were normal, whilst 28 of the 29 outcomes resulted in the loss/death of the baby. This equates to 97% of all known outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child.

When we include the 5 cases where the outcome was still pending it equates to 82% of all outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child. This equates to an average of around 90% between the 82% and 97% figure.

Confidential Pfizer Docs. reveal 90% of Covid Vaccinated Pregnant Women lost their Baby; but Pfizer claimed: “No safety signals emerged” (Daily Exposé)

Previously: Trials

Meanwhile…

Sponsored Link

Related posts:

‘Envy Of The World’ Hard Sell Booster Boom Doing It For The Kids

97 thoughts on “Known Outcomes”

  1. ce

    Given the volume of pfizer used in Irish vaccination program… approx 50%-70-% of all pregnancies in Ireland during that time failed… makes sense, imagine the VAIDS numbers…

      1. SOQ

        Hilarious- not. What you may not realise is that what they are calling VAIDS does not come from HIV and if confirmed as a thing, means that anyone who has had these toxic shots can develop it. But just like the original AIDS- it may take many years to manifest- so to use the Lotto slogan- it could be you !

          1. SOQ

            They also said the same about ADE and that is regarded as the reason why so many double and triple are being re-infected with CoVid-19.

            No evidence means no evidence AT THIS POINT- but if it is the case that just like AIDS, the disease manifests as a list of secondary conditions, it will be quite some time before they reluctantly admit to it.

            One this is for certain- with the documented re-emergence of things like shingles, herpes and hepatitis, some people’s immune systems have taken a battering.

          2. Me So Harney

            But doesn’t quite hit the dizzying stratosphere of truckers mass murdering cops eh..?

          3. Daisy Chainsaw

            Harney, let me know when your string puller is around. I’m not saying I’ll actually deal with the organ grinder, but I’m certainly not dealing with their monkey.

          5. anti bot

            Any monkey who continuously responds with lolslol should be banned for being an immature person incapable for debate, and should not be online when in primary school

    2. Nilbert

      Meanwhile in te real world:
      Covid vaccines safe for pregnant women and cut stillbirth risk, says review

      Doctors have stressed the importance of Covid vaccinations for pregnant women after a major review found the shots were not only safe, but reduced the risk of stillbirth by 15%.

      Researchers at St George’s, University of London, and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists analysed 23 published studies and trials that enrolled 117,552 pregnant women vaccinated against Covid, to assess the safety of the shots.

      The vast majority of the women received the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, which provided 89.5% protection against Covid infection seven days after the second dose. There was no evidence of greater risk from miscarriage, preterm birth or other pregnancy complications.

      Advertisement

      “We wanted to see if vaccination was safe or not for pregnant women,” said Asma Khalil, professor of obstetrics and maternal fetal medicine at St George’s hospital in London. “It is safe, but what’s surprising, and it’s a positive finding, is that there was a reduction in stillbirths.”

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/10/covid-vaccines-safe-for-pregnant-women-and-cut-stillbirth-risk-says-review

      2. K. Cavan

        Nilbert, if you are dumb enough to believe anything in The Guardian, there simply is no hope for you. There actually is a reason that it’s the 20th best-selling daily in the UK, out of 20.
        If you’re dumb enough to believe the experimental injections happen to accidentally reduce stillbirths, well, you are likely to be mentally defective or very low IQ.
        Like Dolly, maybe.

        1. Ten Pin's Fictitious Mrs.

          You really are a full wit. How many times have you posted this?
          ‘if you are dumb enough to believe anything in The Guardian, there simply is no hope for you. There actually is a reason that it’s the 20th best-selling daily in the UK, out of 20’
          Displays the absolute upside down reality you have created for yourself and the ridiculousness of your reasoning in less than 30 odd words.
          I’d volunteer some advice as it seems the right thing to do or I might explain the above to you but how many fuppin times have people on here tried to reason with your rubbish and drunken abuse, 4080 maybe?
          The funny thing is sometimes in your madness you do actually point the finger towards the bad guys but then you are gone in the next sentence, chasing squirrels again.
          Fupp it I’ll point it out to you as I did just google it (took me 4 seconds.
          The leading newspaper in the UK is the Sun.
          Clowntown

      1. Boj

        haha, sure thats what everyone does here all day, every day, 365 days a year, regardless of subject.

  3. Cian

    10-20% of known pregnancies end in miscarriage.

    If you took a random sample of 270 women that found out they were pregnant, you would expect somewhere between 27 and 54 to have a miscarriage.

    Pregnant women weren’t supposed to get the vaccine so it is safe to assume that the majority of these 270 women weren’t aware they were pregnant when they got the vaccine – i.e. were in very early pregnancy.

    Not evidence that the vaccine caused anything.

    1. freewheeling

      “Pregnant women weren’t supposed to get the vaccine”

      That wasn’t what the HSE were telling them. They weren’t part of the Pfizer vaccine trial – that makes it even more unconscionable that the HSE were telling pregnant women to get it and it was “safe” for them and baby. It should be investigated.

      1. Cian

        We are talking about a Pfizer report from 28-FEB-2021; Back then pregnant women weren’t supposed to get the vaccine.

        HSE were not saying that the vaccine was okay for pregnant women at that stage.

      2. Ten Pin's Fictitious Mrs.

        It is being investigated, researched, reported but not by grifters on twitter or Nick Kelly and his beautiful graphs.
        Nor by Mr. SOQ Kavan, Chris, Sailor Gerry, Gemma, Dee Wall, The Bloodhound that is Bodger, Soverignpeople.ie Right said Fred, Matt le Tissier, The Daily Expose, Chrstians against abortion, Canadian Truckers, Climatechangeisahoax.org, Stopthegreatreplacment.com etc et etc etc etc

        1. SOQ

          Say the disturbed individual who spends his time flipping from one username to another?

    2. GiggidyGoo

      ‘Pregnant women weren’t supposed to get the vaccine so it is safe to assume that the majority of these 270 women weren’t aware they were pregnant when they got the vaccine – i.e. were in very early pregnancy.’

      https://www2.hse.ie/conditions/covid19/people-at-higher-risk/covid19-and-pregnancy/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIxOrbk9rF9wIVEO7tCh2C7AYzEAAYASAAEgLbs_D_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

      From that HSE webpage.
      ‘Get vaccinated against COVID-19 if you’re:
      pregnant
      trying for a baby or might get pregnant in the future
      breastfeeding’

      Kinds puts paid to your ‘weren’t supposed to’ and ‘safe to assume’ then Cian.

      1. Me So Harney

        Cian doesn’t care, as long as his precious vaccine isn’t getting poo pood online..

        1. freewheeling

          Not caring is one thing, spreading disinformation (aka. lying) is another (as we were told all the time when vaccines were rolling out.)
          Some people, for whatever reasons, will never admit the mass vaccination was a mistake, even when confronted with the true picture.

          1. K. Cavan

            Yes, Cian does cross over the line from being a sheep to being an evil little scumbag. If the midterms go as expected in the US, the floodgates will open & the court cases will turn from a dribble to a tsunami, from individual damages cases to Federal prosecutions against Pfizer for racketeering.
            If you dabble in the stock market, short Big Pharma.

          1. Cian

            You don’t know that.

            On 28-Feb-2021 (while the majority of these women were still pregnant) there was “no known outcome”. You don’t know any more than that.

            What happens is (out of the 126 million doses shipped)
            a) woman gets jab (not realising she is pregnant)
            b) woman realises and she/her doctor raises an adverse event with local authority (VAERS in USA, yellowcard in UK, HPRA in ireland)
            c) that local authority collates information and informs Pfizer
            d) Pfizer published report

            Pfizer aren’t dealing directly with the women and should not have contact information for them.

        3. GiggidyGoo

          Cian comes racing out of his box more so when there’s a HSE discussion. Skin in the game. Divert, distract, lie are his common traits.

          2. GiggidyGoo

            Except, Cian, you were the one that wrote ‘HSE were not saying that the vaccine was okay for pregnant women at that stage.’, so yes we were discussing that as well in conjunction to Pfizer.

      2. SOQ

        And none of this is even considering the potential harm done to babies which were born alive? They injected an experiential gene therapy with no long term safety data straight into the blood stream of babies with NO immune systems.

        Pfizer were careful with their warnings- the authorities who mowed ahead were not- they are responsible.

          1. SOQ

            Fake news- I said blood stream, not vein.

            The spike protein does not remain in the deltoid- it reaches all the major organs in the body- and the only way it can do so is via the blood stream.

            And if it gets into the mother’s blood stream then you can be certain it gets into the unborn child’s too.

            Also it can be injected directly into a vein which is one of the concerns people like John Campbell had bout the lack of aspiration when administering the vaccines.

          2. Cian

            They injected an experiential gene therapy with no long term safety data straight into the blood stream of babies with NO immune systems.

            Who did this? What are you talking about?

            I’m assuming the “experiential gene therapy ” is the Covid vaccine.

            But babies weren’t eligible for the vaccine. It is currently available from age 5 upwards only.

            Then more of your general anti-vaxx shtick. “babies with NO immune systems.” Do you know that “babies with NO immune systems” get the following vaccines at 2 months
            – 6 in 1 Vaccine (Diphtheria Tetanus Whooping Cough (Pertussis) Hib (Haemophilus influenzae b) Polio (Inactivated poliomyelitis) Hepatitis B)
            – PCV (Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine)
            – MenB Vaccine (Meningococcal B Vaccine)
            – Rotavirus oral vaccine

          3. SOQ

            Unborn babies are just that- and no, I am not getting into the abortion issue, but whatever is in the mother’s blood stream is also in theirs. It has now been proven beyond doubt that the spike proteins travel around via the blood to all the major organs

            If they travel to all the major organs of the mother, then it is highly likely that they travel to the major organs of the child too- via the blood stream.

            There is been absolutely no research done on the impact of those experimental gene therapies on unborn babies- zero. How could there be? There is no long term safety data for adults let alone children yet to be born.

        2. johnny

          ..pointless asking for any links or evidnece,its an absolute cesspit of fact free loudmouths and dullards with no common sense.

          but what about the BABIES….claims old childless single gay man as he tries spread more fear.

          “We wanted to see if vaccination was safe or not for pregnant women,” said Asma Khalil, professor of obstetrics and maternal fetal medicine at St George’s hospital in London. “It is safe, but what’s surprising, and it’s a positive finding, is that there was a reduction in stillbirths.”

          https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/10/covid-vaccines-safe-for-pregnant-women-and-cut-stillbirth-risk-says-review

          1. K. Cavan

            Nice one, johnny, a bit of homophobia to flavour your general ignorance.
            What slime you are.

        3. Ten Pin's Fictitious Mrs.

          Whats the craic with the arrest status of the pfizer vp?
          Clowntown
          WARNING: DO NOT BELIEVE ANYTHING SOQ POSTS

      3. Cian

        We are talking about a Pfizer report from 28-FEB-2021; Back in Feb 2021 pregnant women weren’t supposed to get the vaccine.

        But there have been other trial data since then.

        1. f_lawless

          About that subsequent data:

          https://www.trialsitenews.com/p/sonia_elijah/on-what-basis-are-pregnant-women-being-encouraged-to-take-the-pfizer-vaccine-6e3730c1

          1.A Pfizer-funded study done on 44 female rats in which “no safety pharmacology, pharmacokinetic, genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies were done by Pfizer because they were not deemed ‘necessary.’ “

          2.A preliminary report from a retrospective cohort of >40,000 pregnant women. Lead author is a Pfizer employee. The majority of women in the study were administered the shot in the third trimester. “This is a significant confounding factor effecting the study results This is because 80% of miscarriages (spontaneous abortions) occur in the first trimester.” Only 1.7% given the shot in first trimester.

          “…Yet, despite the alarming results found in Pfizer’s cumulative adverse events report and the findings in the non-clinical review, which revealed that many safety studies were not done, the CDC continues to recommend this vaccine (with an estimated clinical trial completion date of February 2024 and no long term safety data) to pregnant women..”

        2. GiggidyGoo

          Pregnant women in the UK healthcare sector were ‘offered’ the vaccine in December 2020.

        3. GiggidyGoo

          https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57f218fcff7c50d391de9c7a/t/6006f415f6b2401f07767cd3/1611068438170/COVID+vaccination+when+pregnant+or+breastfeeding.pdf
          Published January 2021.
          The above document was prepared by:
          Royal College of Physicians
          NIAC

          and endorsed by
          National Womens and Infants Health program.

          From that:

          ‘Q. Are pregnant women able to get the COVID-19 vaccine?
          A. Yes. Pregnant women are not excluded from getting the COVID-19 vaccine. Neither
          the European Medicines Agency (EMA) nor the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) list
          pregnancy as a contraindication. A pregnancy test prior to vaccination is not required’ body.’

          1. Cian

            It is a balanced FAQ. It mentions the lack of pregnant women in the trials, it mention the unknown risks. It fact is says


            Q. What is the advice for pregnant women in Ireland?
            A. The National Immunisation Advisory Committee, a group of independent experts in Ireland, recommends that pregnant women who are at high risk of severe COVID-19 and pregnant healthcare workers should talk to their obstetrics care provider about having the COVID-19 vaccine. They should discuss their risk of getting COVID-19 in light of their particular circumstances. Based on this they can consider getting the vaccine balancing the small unknown risks related to the vaccine against the serious risks associated with COVID-19

          2. GiggidyGoo

            So, where did you get the ‘weren’t supposed to’?

            Just to repeat.

            ‘Pregnant women are not excluded from getting the COVID-19 vaccine’

            No mention of shouldn’t, not supposed to, etc.

            So, once again you try divert and distract.

          3. Cian

            My bad. I was wrong, I didn’t know it was open to pregnant healthcare workers.

            What I should have said was :
            The pregnant women who were eligible for the vaccine in Sprint 2021 were given a balanced information stating that the vaccine had not been tested and were recommended to discuss the risks with their obstetrics care provider.

    1. johnny

      its all over Infowars-oh hold on they filled for bankruptcy over litigation relating,to spreading misinformation and lies,see above post for example.

      “…. pregnant women were excluded from the initial large-scale Covid-19 vaccine trials. There were 57 unintended pregnancies during the trials of the Moderna, Pfizer and Astrazeneca vaccines but this number was too small to show much about safety in pregnancy.”

      https://fullfact.org/health/pfizer-document-vaccine-breastfeeding-pregnancy/

      1. Chris

        Imagine being so dense as to link to compromised lying ‘fact checkers’ this late in the situation. The above post comes from Pfizers own trial data.

        1. johnny

          image being English and wasting your whole day insulting paddies on a irish site.
          ah gwan,say it louder in your brit accent,dumb paddy huh,how are the locals treating you,has the move to Ireland worked out or as above do you still feel like an outsider or that you don’t belong…..

          1. Chris

            Accents aren’t really portrayed well in written text, unless you add colloquial terms and such, but that relies on the imagination of an audience to interpret.

            Unfortunately for yourself – you’re an unrelenting thick with probable cognitive drug damage. Perhaps you’re somewhat aware of this given your projection and angry tirades. Or perhaps not.

            https://youtu.be/ww47bR86wSc

    2. K. Cavan

      Eventually, Florrie, they will sneak out a few mealy-mouthed articles but they’ve been the ones herding the sheep towards death & injury, so the blood on their hands makes typing problematic.

      1. Ten Pin's Fictitious Mrs.

        Can’t help yourself can you, always have to go to the extreme. If it turns out that pfizer are guilty of misinforming the public or that the vaccine is in fact overwhelmingly harmful, it will be people like you and the rest of the clowntown residents here and around the world, that will actually fupp up the prosecution against them.

        1. Ten Pin's Fictitious Mrs.

          On the other hand, lots of theories out there that the pharma companies are paying people to post the rubbish you Nick, SOQ etc post here every day to muddy the waters in the hope of avoiding prosecution.
          NEW CONSPIRACY BELOW
          SOQ and the Kavan man is on the the pfizer blood money payroll.
          I say is because everyone here has by this stage copped that you are the same pharma shill.
          Good day to you pharma boy.
          Count that Dirty Money.

  5. Cian

    The interesting thing in this document is that we only saw redacted versions before.

    It says there were 42,086 people that reported adverse events.. and 1,223 deaths. Scary numbers!! …until you see that there were over 126 million doses shipped.

    1. Chris

      Those numbers were within the trial group, many more deaths and injuries as reported to VAERS and other agencies. Liar.

      1. Cian

        Nope. It was data from people getting the vaccine during the initial rollout.
        Read the report. I’ve copied out an important bit:


        1. INTRODUCTION
        […]
        This document provides an integrated analysis of the cumulative post-authorization safety data, including U.S. and foreign post-authorization adverse event reports received through 28 February 2021
        […]
        3.1.1. General Overview
        It is estimated that approximately 126,212,580 doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021.

        Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy
        (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866) and Spain (756); the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries

        (my emphasis)

        https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

        1. K. Cavan

          Your implication, I assume Cian, is that these are good numbers? These mRNA injections have already overtaken real vaccines that have been & are still being administered by the billion & by a huge margin, in terms of deaths & injuries. They are the single most dangerous medical intervention in history & it’s early days.

    2. GiggidyGoo

      Well, we’re discussing the pregnancy aspect, but to deal with your post – the report which you refer deals with a period between 8th December 2020 and 28th February 2021. Less than three months.

      Additionally the report states ‘”Among adverse event reports received into the Pfizer safety database during the cumulative period, only those having a complete workflow cycle in the safety database (meaning they progressed to Distribution or Closed workflow status) are included in the monthly SMSR’

      So, Cian, the interesting thing about your post isn’t the Pfizer document so much as your attempt to Divert and Distract.

      That’s two attempts you’ve made on this news item to muddy the waters. Cop onto yourself.

      1. andrew

        With respect, you don’t know what you’re talking about. You have misunderstood the report and Cian’s comment. He is bang on correct.

        1. johnny

          with respect,focus the exchange on trucks,ok look a big truck.
          (everything else is wasted due to a lack of comprehension)

        2. GiggidyGoo

          With respect andrew, you need to expand on why you think he’s not diverting, distracting. I’m correct. I’ve quoted from the report he refers to. (Awaiting your reference mind you) Cian has a habit of quoting figures that, when looked into, are usually attempts at muddying the water. On their own they may be correct, but in this case a 3 month period isn’t such a bread section.

          As for Johnny. Well, we all know his penchant for misunderstanding discussions here.

        3. K. Cavan

          Thanks for that, andrew, your fact-free, off-the-cuff opinion is important to us but we are experiencing a high volume of bullcrap at the moment…

      2. Cian

        you forgot to add the remainder of that paragraph which said that serious events were processed in a timely manor::

        This approach prevents the inclusion of cases that are not fully processed hence not accurately reflecting final information. Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, the MAH has prioritised the processing of serious cases, in order to meet expedited regulatory reporting timelines and ensure these reports are available for signal detection and evaluation activity. The increased volume of reports has not impacted case processing for serious reports, and compliance metrics continue to be monitored weekly with prompt action taken as needed to maintain compliance with expedited reporting obligations.
        (my emphasis)

        1. GiggidyGoo

          ‘..only those having a complete workflow cycle in the safety database (meaning they progressed to Distribution or Closed workflow status) are included in the monthly SMSR’’

          And you now try to divert to a mention of just ‘serious cases’ – omitting the ‘to expedite’. Pfizer like to expedite things.

          From your post above.

          ‘This approach prevents the inclusion of cases that are not fully processed hence not accurately reflecting final information.’

  6. wearnicehats

    The time difference between Bodger posting this kind of click-bait and the usual suspects replying is usually the length of time it takes them to knock one out to it

      1. andrew

        Still waiting on your source for Cloutier being in a hole in the ground in Mariupol…. tick tock as you say yourself. Come on now, don’t be shy…

        tick tock

  7. f_lawless

    I don’t think that Daily Expose article is particularly helpful by framing the Pfizer data in the following way:

    “it equates to 82% of all outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child”

    It’s disregarding the fact that there was no follow up data provided for 238 of the 270 pregnancies. This alone is a major red flag but we just don’t know what all the outcomes were.

    I think this is an informative article, published a few days ago. It goes through the timeline of events that preceded the Pfizer shot being recommended to pregnant women in the US:. It makes for uncomfortable reading

    https://www.trialsitenews.com/p/sonia_elijah/on-what-basis-are-pregnant-women-being-encouraged-to-take-the-pfizer-vaccine-6e3730c1

    1. andrew

      I’d be happy to explain why your comment and your link are utter rubbish. And will do so if you like. But only if you genuinely want to be educated. Merely say the word…

      2. K. Cavan

        The hubris of this andrew character reminds me of someone. Everyone knows who you are, fool.

        1. Chris

          Notice how none of the shills will address that BMJ article? Like toddlers that imagine you can’t see them if they hide their face.

    1. K. Cavan

      Just cut out the words “anti-vax” & “next”, Boe, we’re well used to your idiotic, drooling crap by now, so we’d get it.

  9. U N M U T U A L

    This thread needs more seat belt analogies…

    How about it cian?

    Go on, for old times’ sake…

    2. Cian

      Seat belts don’t work.

      In 2021 86% of RTA deaths in the UK (drivers/passengers) were wearing seatbelts. Ergo – seat belts don’t work.

      2. K. Cavan

        Imagine the lack of cop-on this guy Cian possesses, he actually delivered a seat-belt post, to order.
        He couldn’t quite stretch to an analogy but that probably would’ve been torturous, anyway.
        Those still in denial about the results of the mRNA fake vaccine experiment are beyond reason at this stage, they’re gonna have to lock themselves in their attics to avoid what’s coming.
        Or maybe you need more boosters, Cian, when you’re dead it’ll be someone else’s problem, right?

        1. SOQ

          I must say, I am begining to become quite uncaring about this issue. Loads of stories on social media about people who were so pro leper passes and discrimination etc then dying- and I just think ‘well, if anyone has to, better be them’.

          It is those who were bullied or threatened into taking it whom I feel for because they are the real victims. Unfortunately some of those who done the bulling will never meet be brought to justice- although every one that is prosecuted, is one less walking the streets.

          Dr Robert Malone recently said that you will soon hear the ‘nobody forced you to take it ‘defence being bandied about- and unfortunately, as per usual, he is right.

  10. K. Cavan

    The information that’s coming from the Pfizer documents, which they wanted held back for three quarters of a century, for some reason, is astonishing.
    Imagine that the Pfizer fake vaccine came in 3, 10 & 30 microgram doses & that nobody knew which they were getting.
    The Moderna only came in 100 microgram doses but did include SM102 as a secret ingredient, one of the single deadliest carcinogens known to scientists. A substance with a safety sheet that cautions that it should never be in contact with the skin was injected into children & adults.
    We are looking at the aftermath of the Crime Of The Century, in a century of criminality at the highest levels of science, industry & government.
    We really, really need to bring back capital punishment for such evil people.

  11. wearnicehats

    here’s a list of what K Cavan brings to this thread

    you are likely to be mentally defective or very low IQ

    cross over the line from being a sheep to being an evil little scumbag

    What slime you are

    we are experiencing a high volume of bullcrap at the moment

    What a pathetic little lowlife you are

    Everyone knows who you are, fool

    we’re well used to your idiotic, drooling crap by now

    when you’re dead it’ll be someone else’s problem,

    What a guy

Comments are closed.

Broadsheet.ie