This week’s cover of Charlie Hebdo.

Related: New Twist: Charlie Hebdo Police Investigator Turns Up Dead, ‘Suicided’ (21stCenturyWire)

Meanwhile…

paris-leader-march-large
haredi-paper

Oy vey

Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Newspaper Edits Female World Leaders Out of Charlie Hebdo March (Mediate)

mail2Today’s Irish Daily Mail

Splutter.

Is there a canon lawyer in the house?

A legal expert told the Irish Daily Mail that the extraordinary situation may have lawyers perplexed because they are not sure exactly how the priest might have come by the money he is alleged to have taken.
For example, if he was given the cash in the form of a gift, prosecuting could be problematic. A senior security source told the Mail: ‘This is a complex case. From a legal point of view, one thing the DPP must be looking at is Canon Law.
‘The last thing the DPP or An Garda Síochána would want is for this priest to be criminally charged only for there to be an issue down the line with Canon Law.’
An Irish legal expert in Canon Law said there ‘might well be an issue’ in relation to Church laws in this instance.
The barrister, who declined to be named as the case is ongoing, said: ‘Criminal law is the code of the State. But, on the basis of what you have explained about this case, an issue could arise in terms of what he was entitled to do with this money. If this priest was given some of the money in the circumstances as a gift, an issue could arise.
‘The question is in what context was the money given? So there could be issues with Canon Law.’
Adding that she did not know all the details of this case, the barrister said: ‘It could boil down to diocesan structures and whether the money was an unconditional gift.
‘On the other side of it, if it is considered straightforward theft, then Canon Law might not be a consideration at all.
‘It is important not to second-guess the DPP before a decision is made. There could be various reasons for the length of time the file is with the DPP.’

Anyone?

*Phones Legal Coffee Drinker*

Will Priest Who Stole €500,000 Avoid Charges (Ali Bracken Irish Daily Mail – unavailable online)

stevensharpe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aTT63HIQ7M

Steven Sharpe – Moody

The first ever GTI Music Session. A collaboration between musicians and students at Galway Technical Institute.

Colm Dunne writes:

We are a volunteering group of students and we are very proud of the talent we’ve had into the studio over the last few weeks. This week, Galway’s Steven Sharpe, next week, Wayne Wilder….

GTI Sessions

Roche-James-Rodriguez-y-Van-Pe_54420420509_54115221152_960_640

Vote here

That goal

Related: Ivan Yates: Stephanie doesn’t deserve award; nomination ‘the height of tokenism’ (BreakingNews.ie)

Previously: Stephanie Roche on Broadsheet

https://vine.co/v/ODhDATpM1Fi

90366980 9036698190366982
90366988

Camden Street, Dublin this afternoon.

Leah writes:

Protesters outside the closed doors of Shelbourne College following revelations that students could be owed up to €500,000 from the college. This includes 150 Students who payed up front but were never able to come to Ireland.

From top: Praise Dauda, Cynthia Manda; group shot and Nithin Mangattu Manoharan.

(Leah Farrell/Photocall Ireland)

B5bBNp7IQAEHmEL-1 Sunday Independent’s LIFE magazine on December 21, 2014

You may have seen the cover of LIFE magazine over the Christmas of comedian and mimic Oliver Callan depicting President Michael D Higgins, his wife Sabina and  presidential assistant assistant Kevin McCarthy.

In yesterday’s Sunday Independent, the Abbot of Glenstal Abbey, Mark Patrick Hederman wrote an opinion piece decrying the LIFE cover, stating:

“The idea that every home in Ireland should be subjected to this supposedly humorous depiction of the President, his wife and his assistant, Kevin McCarthy, seems to me to be a scandal that should cause shame to us all. This is no less than bullying and harassment in the workplace, which we are trying to phase out at every other level, but when it comes to the President and his wife, we seem to imply they are fair game. Such lampooning of our President, his wife, and his assistant can no longer pass as entertainment.”

Further to this, both Mr Callan and Mr Hederman spoke to Sean O’Rourke on RTÉ Radio One this morning.

Oliver Callan: “Satire mentions the elephant in the room and that’s what Charlie Hebdo’s done that’s what I’m doing aswell. To suggest that the President is so sensitive that he would feel this is bullying, I find that really hard to believe. I don’t make fun of people who are vulnerable, who don’t have the means to defend themselves. I also thought it was unfortunate by the way that the Abbot didn’t mention that he was a friend of the President, you know, he’s obviously very close to him. The President’s last book of poetry was dedicated to Mark Hederman as well and I thought that was unfortunate you didn’t raise that conflict of interest in your article yesterday but in fairness you’ve done it today.”

Mark Hederman: “No, there’s no conflict of interest in this. The fact that a friend of mine is being bullied is the exact reason why I should stand up and say, ‘enough is enough’.”

Callan: “But when you say ‘bullied’, how can you bully a president, someone who has the support of 1.2 million people who voted for him? Who has the admiration of the country? I mean it’s very difficult for someone like me to be…”

Hederman: “This, I’m afraid to say, it happens every single day in the workplace because, you mean. Look, I agree with you, some of what you do and some of what you say is extremely funny and I laugh at it immensely but when you go over the edge and start making insinuations about Kevin McCarthy and the President which is, kind of, you know, not stated but..”

Callan: “Well, I,  to be honest, I don’t know what you’re saying there cause I didn’t make insinuations about Kevin McCarthy, what I did raise is the very serious issue in this country and it was a very big issue in 2014 about cronyism and it was cronyism that a man, who drove the President around in the election, had a role invented for him, a taxpayers’ role, as executive assistant, a role which didn’t previously exist in the McAleese administration and that’s all I was suggesting in that. I don’t know what else you’re suggesting in anything I wrote.”

Hederman: “Right. Well, you are the one who’s gaining I don’t know how many members of your audience, because the suggestion is much more than that in what you’re..”

Callan: “You’re drawing conclusions more than what I’m saying.”

Hederman: “Maybe, well, I am, maybe.”

Sean O’Rourke: “We’ve heard the Abbot say, already Oliver Callan, that there’s no basis for any insinuation that may be read into, are you willing to accept that?”

Callan: “Absolutely, I mean the President has the defence of defamation like any citizen in the country.”

Later

Callan: “I’m a small man myself and I don’t find it’s something to be insecure about.”

Listen back in full here

Previously: Aide Decamps

This Cannot Innuendo Well

Broadsheet.ie