Tag Archives: Green Party

11021418_10153595822158066_776364820427253314_o

Green Party Leader Eamon Ryan

The Green Party’s annual convention is taking place in Kilkenny this weekend {link below]

Green Party member David Gosling outlines why he has stuck with a party some perceive as “at best a bit kooky and at worst deluded”.

And why you should TOO.

No wait, come back.

David writes:

I am a Green Party member since 2006. I like to think that my life to date has encompassed activities and experiences which allow me cast a critical eye on the world around me. I am 48, an ex-Army officer/Facilities Manager/small scale property developer/ex- e-commerce business owner/charity worker/full time MBA student and I am currently part of a small team readying a Built Environment – Carbon and Cost Reduction business for launch. I am married, with two small children, and I have lived and worked in London, Singapore, Western Sahara, Lebanon and a number of other countries.

I am not a natural Campaigner, nor Politician. I am interested in the efficient, effective and successful creation and running of organisations which see the world in a broad and holistic manner; in assisting societal, behavioral and personal change; en route to securing a positive future for our children and their descendants.

In advance of elections the only way for most people to judge political parties is to read election manifestos with a critical eye. This is where the spoken word is locked into written form; immutable for eternity; though not necessarily followed through when in Government. In 2007 I read all of the parties’ manifestos before the election and it was heavy going! The manifesto that made most sense was by the Greens.

The particular measure that sealed the deal for me was the proposal on Capital Gains Tax. I was in the property business at that time and had benefited from the low, 20%, rate prevailing. “Oh-oh” I thought, “this will be bad news for the likes of me”.

But it was nothing of the sort, the proposal was to increase CGT to 25%, in line with the lowest effective rate of taxation. Rationally, the Greens saw the inequality in those realising windfall profits paying less tax than those in low paying jobs. And many other proposals were rational, logical and progressive.

To a woman and a man Green representatives, and I don’t necessarily agree with all of them, are honest almost to the point, sometimes, of political naivety.

They reduced political donation limits, eschewed corporate donations and took necessary political action when it was right to do so; Trevor Sargent’s resignation, first as party leader and then as a Junior Minister displayed this. Accusing past and present Green representatives of being in it for themselves is, in a very loose comparison, like accusing Gandhi of being in it to become a celebrity.

But sure aren’t they all the same those politicians!

Well, no, they are not all the same: Haughey & Fitzgerald, Blair & Churchill, GW Bush & JFK, National Socialists (Nazis) & Indian Congress Party! But we are talking about Irish politicians here, about Irish political parties, about our specific political system. However, the answer remains: are Sinn Fein the same as Labour, is Enda Kenny the same as Eamon Ryan, is Willie O’Dea the same as Michael D Higgins? No.

Liverpool FC dominated in the 80s but fell from grace. Are they a waste of a team now? Did they make mistakes even during their reign? Are their current players useless? Similarly the Greens made mistakes, but in good faith.

Does the combination of trying to change elements of the system for the better, bad timing and ‘greenness’ while in their first government make them self-serving or cynical? See here for Green Party achievements in government.

The Greens are a serious political proposition; a proposition which encompasses moral, ethical and scientifically backed policies and the political will to push for change; a combination, if an honest comparison were to be undertaken, missing in virtually all other parties. Unfortunately, the reality is a perception, amongst a section of the public, that the Greens are at best a bit kooky and at worst deluded as to their importance in the political system.

This is an unfair categorisation because many rational blue, and white, collar voters see in the Greens echoes of their own concerns. Concerns about daily life, community life, national life and of course life globally.

Another, more difficult and immediate, concern to the Greens is the overhanging legacy of time in Government with Fianna Fail. The part played by the Greens in the inflated economy which led to the bursting of the property bubble, derailing the economic stability and progress of the country; the weakening, or at worst, destruction of our national sovereignty.

Let’s debunk the former concern and examine the latter. Rationally, and this is the key point, the Greens did not contribute to the raising of the country to its awful tipping point. How could they have? They entered government on 2006. By 2000 the Celtic Tiger; defined by rates of economic growth, not rates of house completions or BMW purchases, had stopped roaring and the property boom replaced it in the upward only drive to the top.

By late 2006 the residential property market had begun its decline. I know this because I put a house on the market in spring 2006 and rejected an offer assuming the autumn selling season would see it worth more. It sold for less than the spring offer!

The slide was on. So; the Greens in government with FF did not contribute ‘directly’ to the positive economic growth in the late 1990 ’s, but more crucially did not have any hand in the madness that was the property boom; in fact the Greens were one of the few political voices of restraint and caution during the boom.

Most rational Irish people know this; whether they expediently blame the Greens for some sort of “ah but they were in Government during the boom” or not. Far more crucial to our current reputation is the perception of our part in the bank guarantee scheme and NAMA.

Yes, the Greens were part of the Government which agreed to, created and implemented the measures; measures seen as necessary to stabilise the Banking Sector and thus the national economy and even, daily life on the island. Heavy stuff this! Yep, they were there, reading the analyses, at the table, in the room, at the helm when the bottom fell out of not only our economy, but out of our collective world.

Green ministers and TDs, after exhaustively challenging the inherent assumptions, agreed to the measures taken. Measures which morphed into policies and actions. Policies and actions deemed vital to stabilise the economy; but in reality to stabilise the country, and us as a people in our economic futures.

Policies and actions roundly criticised by opposition parties. Parties who, rather like the child who ‘hated’ his classmate’s sweets, only to eat them when the other left them on the table. Fine Gael/Labour in effect plagarised the necessary policies and actions of the Greens and their government partners.

For me, a supporter of the decision to enter government with Fianna Fail and of the implementation of NAMA, the Greens are facing a particularly interesting issue. In the lead up to the 2016 General Election they find themselves in a somewhat bizarre place at the center of the current political landscape. Not an ideological position, but one of perception.

With FF, FG Labour and Sinn Fein occupying the place of the known quantity; of larger numbers of Dail seats, of rigid structures and fixed positions as to how to govern the country. These parties are not to be trusted to do the right thing. Their histories are of doing the expedient & electorally appealing; give-away budgets, while ignoring the need for social funding etc.

On the left we find the ‘Garage/Start Up’ parties; a scrappy insurgency of loosely affiliated socialists, water protestors, austerity protestors and other independents and interest groups. Bizarrely these; ‘socialist’ leaning parties/groups do not believe in high levels of taxation, or in government; cornerstones of Socialism globally. The Greens are neither bound by history, precedent or by radical yet incoherent positions, perspectives or policies.

FIGHT!

Kilkenny Convention livestream here

90213044

Green Party’s Dan Boyle (left), Eamon Ryan (centre) and Trevor Sargent during the 2011 General Election

Further to the Green Party proposal of a referendum on the public ownership of our water.

Dan Boyle writes:

Public anger and frustration in Ireland at how water is being made available and is expected to be paid for, has come about because no one at a Government level has managed to provided a satisfactory answer as to who is benefitting from this?

As a basic essential of life water should be considered the ultimate public utility. The fear exists that by creating an Irish Water company the government is setting the scene to sell the country’s water infrastructure to the private sector and with that the ability to practically print money by being able to charge the public for the right to use water.

This is why the Green Party is calling on the Government to advance the legislation for a referendum on public ownership of water as a priority, and to ensure that it is included with the Bills already scheduled to be passed in order to hold other referenda in 2015.

Green Party councillors across the country have already submitted motions to their respective councils in Louth, Fingal, Dublin City, Dublin South, Dun Laoghaire – Rathdown, Wicklow and Kilkenny, calling for these councils to support a referendum on the public ownership of water.

The Green Party is proposing the inclusion of the following new Article 10.5 into Bunreacht na hÉireann, which would state:

“The State shall treat drinking water as an essential resource and in the interests of the common good the State shall not provide for the privatisation or commercialisation of water services for the people”.

If Irish Water has been established to rationalise services and provide economies of scale why has it increased the numbers working within it, increasing costs whilst introducing a bonus culture for not its work particularly well?

If introducing water charges in this way through this body is about encouraging water conservation, why are flat rate charges being made, that allow water users use as much water in whatever way they like?

If this method of seeking payment for water is to get consumers to think differently on how water is used, then how come the money isn’t being recycled in grants for householders to develop rainwater collection systems?

By any measure the steps taken by the Irish government on the future use and development of the country’s water infrastructure, with the establishment of the shambolic Irish Water company, is failing on every level. A constitutional provision is necessary to prevent this and any future governments from making any further mistakes.

Dan Boyle is a former TD and Senator.

Sign the petition here

(Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland)

er1

[A dozing Green Party leader Eamon Ryan at the offices of Spunout.ie, in Dublin]

“Eamon Ryan cuts a slightly forlorn figure on Westmoreland Street….But the Greens are on a bit of a comeback trail and that much has been evident over the past six months. But it’s modest and soft. Certainly, the Green Party is on the road to recovery but maybe not travelling at quite the pace of those Westmoreland Street pedestrians….”

Irish Times political correspondent Harry McGee shadowed Green Party leader and European election candidate Eamon Ryan for a day in Dublin.

FIGHT!

Full interview here.

They love their sleep.

On the campaign trail with Eamon Ryan (Harry McGee, Irish Times)

Previously: Why John Gormley Stayed In Bed

ssh

http://vimeo.com/94840023

Green Party candidate for Galway City Centre Ward Seamus Sheridan highlights the 23 [TWENTY THREE] shopping centres in Galway and another one is on the way.

Thanks Olaf

Meanwhile in Dublin 8…

photo 2

Leon writes:

Looks like someone’s not into the Green Party down on Francis St.

90213044-1[Dan Boyle, Eamon Ryan, and Trevor Sargent during the 2011 General Election]

Forgive the Green Party?

Are you out of your tiny fracking mind?

Let the man speak.

Former Green Party senator Dan Boyle, who is running for a seat on Cork City Council, writes:

The interactions are at a lower level now and are far more informal. Engagements tend to take place more on the street or in a pub. The tone also tends to be less aggressive and is now more often than not one of mutual concern. “This Climate Change is real Dan isn’t it?” It’s no longer being said with any sense of irony.

You still come across those who hold the Greens responsible for everything that’s ever gone wrong in the country. In all probability such voters never supported The Greens so it’s not a good use of time to engage with them. I usually find that they tend to be Fine Gael supporters who seem to be enjoying their return to the summits of smugness and complacency.

These may be a different type of local elections where instead of being a referendum on national politics. Local issue for once will come to the fore. When I knock on doors I’m more likely to be asked a local waterway or walkway or park. Most of the community wants to participate in how these projects were planned. Many of us were elected first by practicing such projects, it’s a type of politics we would like to see back in practice.

However more benign it has become for Greens to talk to the public, it has to be remembered that Greens were never that popular to begin with. Even at the ‘height’ of Green success the party wasn’t winning more than 3.5% of the national vote in local elections.

Where Greens succeeded in being elected was through secondary votes, transfers, being most people’s second choice. Since a situation reversed in many voters minds. A future for the Greens can only be gained through community engagement.

Irish politics in particular, as opposed to much European politics, depends on an almost personal relationship between the voter and the candidate. Greens have traditionally not embraced this process to the extent they should have. Although those of us who were elected quickly came to realise we would never be elected unless we embraced this political fact.

The issue agenda seems to be veering towards the Greens although this is not as strait-forward as it seems either, issues like pylons and fracking tend to be located in communities where traditional Green support has tended not to exist.

These may help develop independent Green awareness that can be worked with but it’s fair to say it isn’t a large aspect of current Green Party redevelopment either, only to a slight extent.. There is an added complication of Green Party policy on pylons being deliberately misrepresented, but then that’s politics…

I’ve always enjoyed the banter gained from the doorsteps, and the political wisdom that comes from back handed compliments. There are those who in coming months who will prefer the big bang approach in helping to re-direct Irish politics, through staged media events. Knocking on doors got me to where I am it can get those who still believe that we need diverse politics in Ireland and the Green should be a part of that.

Dan Boyle

Fight!

(Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland)

Ever wonder: What the fuck does ‘passive-aggressive’ actually mean?

Suggestion: download Pat Kenny’s interview with John Gormley, which has just finished on the wireless.

You will possibly agree with a lot of what Gormley says.

But you will dislike him so much that you will quickly take an opposite position.

And start SHOUTING at his voice.

As Nat, who is on fire at the moment, so wisely put it: “He literally tore himself a new one.”

Today With Pat Kenny (RTE.ie)