Category Archives: News

news as it is happening-ish

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtL06DVaZ00&feature=player_embedded

Last night’s Tonight with Vincent Browne – with a panel that included Joan Burton, Dr James Reilly and Trevor Sargent – was a classic. And the highlight was an exchange between the host and Fianna Fail deputy leader Mary Hanafin.

It concerned the €750 million payout earlier this month to bondholders who were not covered by the bank guarantee. Why was the money paid when it wasn’t necessary? To put this into context the amount of money saved by social service cuts in November’s budget was around €800 million.

The obvious question now is who got the money? Best not ask Mary, though.

Mary Hanafin: “What happened in Anglo was appalling. It is absolutely disgraceful and I think we would all agree on that.”

Vincent Browne: “Mary, can I just ask you one question? Can I just ask you one question? Why did your government, of which you are a member, two weeks ago pay €750m to bondholders in Anglo Irish Bank who were no longer covered by the   guarantee? Why did it do that?”

Hanafin: “Because that was the agreement that was reached.”

Browne: “That is not part of the, that is not part… I’m sorry, Mary. That is not part of the agreement entered into with the EU and IMF.”

Hanafin: “Yeah, no, but it was part of the guarantee that was given.”

Browne: “I’m very sorry, Mary. It was out of guarantee. Now why did you pay €750m to bondholders in Anglo Irish Bank who were not covered by the guarantee? Why did you do that?”

Hanafin: “Because the bondholders around, the senior bondholders around the banks, are people who were given a guarantee at the time two years ago. Those bondholders also include pension funds, they include credit unions, they include ordinary Irish people and their money, and that money had to be protected.”

Browne: “Mary…”

Hanafin: “And the reason we gave that guarantee at the time – and this is important because people are saying we shouldn’t have done it.”

Browne: “We’re not talking about the guarantee.”

Hanafin: “The governor of the Central Bank even says it is a systemic bank and should be guaranteed.”

Browne: “Mary, this is nothing to do with it. Nothing to do with it. I’ll ask the question again.”

Hanafin: “Yeah.”

Browne: “Why did you pay €750m to bondholders who are not covered by the guarantee? And you did that two or three weeks ago at a time when you’re cutting social welfare, you’re devastating the lives of people on the margins, you pay €750m to these people not covered by any guarantee.”

Hanafin: “Well we have obligations to the bondholders because…”

Browne: “What obligations did you have to the bondholders?”

Hanafin: “Because of the agreement that we made two years ago.”

Browne: “Mary -”

Hanafin: “The subordinated bondholders have already lost significantly…”

Browne: “Mary you’re not, you’re not.”

Hanafin: “To the tune of €10bn.”

Browne: “There is no obligation to the bondholders. Zero. Zero obligation to the bondholders. None at all. No moral, no legal, no obligation at all to the bondholders. Why at a time when you’re cutting social welfare did you pay €750m to these people?”

Hanafin: “I know you want to talk about cutting social welfare which was a very different thing to do as well and we accept that, but if you’re going to bridge the gap between what the government is taking in and what we’re spending, unfortunately that’s what had to be done.”

Browne: “You had to pay €750m to bondholders not covered by the guarantee.”

Hanafin. “No, no. I’m picking up on the point of the about social welfare. No, but it was part of the agreement and it had to be done and we had to honour that agreement.”

Browne: “What agreement? Mary you’re not, you’re not… We agreed to guarantee certain bondholders and depositors in the banks and some of those guarantees expired and there was no longer a legal or moral obligation to pay them anything. and … you still paid €750m in the last two weeks.”

Hanafin: “Yes, well, bit longer I think.”

Browne: Incredible isn’t it?

Hanafin: “It is a lot of money and I accept that but this is part of our obligations.”

Browne: “Where? What obligations?”

Hanafin: “To support the Irish banking system.”

Browne: “It’s nothing to do with the Irish banking system.”

Hanafin: “And to ensure that we can always go back then. The money we’re borrowing internationally, for example, we have to be able to continue to be able to go back, to make sure.”

Joan Burton: “But we’re not borrowing internationally. We’re out of the markets. That’s the whole point. We’re out of the markets. We’re not borrowing. That’s why you can deal with the bondholders.”

Hanafin: “But we have to make sure that when we do go back to the markets, which of course is our aim, and to be able to do it fairly quickly, is that we will be able to do that.”

Browne: “Sure they’ll think us crazy.”

Hanafin: Well they’ll certainly think us crazy if we don’t honour our debts

Browne: “But these are not our debts. They’re not our debts Mary. THEY ARE NOT OUR DEBTS! These are the debts of Anglo Irish Bank. We gave a guarantee, the guarantee expired. No longer do we have any obligation and yet we paid. Why?”

Hanafin: “Yeah. Because we gave commitments and we gave a guarantee, and we have to honour that.”

Browne: [high-pitched sound]

Hanafin: “And we do expect to go back to the markets and we do expect to be able to compete in those markets the same as everybody else and to make our way

Browne: “Very thin, very thin explanation. A very, very thin explanation Mary, very thin…”

A billboard protesting against  Fine Gael’s plan to re-introduce stag hunting in Ireland – planned for a site close to FG’s HQ In Mount Street, Dublin – has been pulled.

Ad agency JCDecaux has told campaigners from animal rights group ARAN (above, with Independent TD Maureen O’Sullivan this afternoon) that the ‘blood’ spattered image above is not suitable for the spot, metres from the party’s office.

It might be reasonably argued that the picture does not actually depict Enda Kenny but in fact is this guy (whom even RTE once thought was Enda). Either way, a taste of things to come.

(Photocall Ireland)

Fine Gael insisted today the views of Dublin South East TD Lucinda Creighton were her own after she was heavily criticised for views she expressed on gay marriage.

Ms Creighton, who is a party spokeswoman on equality issues, said in a Twitter post on Saturday that she believed marriage was “primarily about children, main purpose being to propagate & create”.

Which must please her husband.

Asked for comment on Ms Creighton’s remarks and on the wider policy issue, a Fine Gael spokesman said: “Lucinda Creighton’s comments represent her own personal views. In 2004 Fine Gael was the first political party to call for civil partnership for same sex couples and has been fully supportive of the civil partnership legislation at all times.”

He said that if elected to government, the party was committed to “fully implementing this legislation by making changes to the Finance and Social Welfare Acts to give full effect to the rights afford to civil partners by the Civil Partnership Act 2009”.

He said Fine Gael’s election manifesto commits to this. “It also commits (on page 36) to require schools to anti-bullying policies and, in particular, strategies to combat homophobic bullying.”

Which still doesn’t mean they support same-sex marriage.

More as we get it.

Fine Gael Says Creighton Views ‘Her Own’ (Irish Times)

When the bailout bit last autumn, it looked as though Irish voters might choose the more radical of the credible options. In late 2010, Labour led the polls. But as the moment of choice has drawn nearer, Labour support has faltered, down five points in this week’s poll.

Today, voters seem to be gravitating to the more cautious option of Fine Gael, who may even win an unprecedented overall majority.

Fine Gael are almost as much a part of the old Irish political culture as FF; unlike their rivals, though, they were not holding the parcel when the music stopped.

But Ireland’s voters, like those elsewhere, predictably seem keener on giving the other lot a go than on breaking with the system of which both major parties have long been beneficiaries.

Ireland: A Change Too Far (Guardian)

Meanwhile…

Travors.com

Ireland’s banks are effectively up for sale, Governor of the Central Bank Patrick Honohan said today.

“They are for sale as far as I am concerned,” Mr Honohan said in an address to Chartered Accountants Ireland in Dublin. “I’ve been an advocate for a number of years for small countries to have foreign owners for their banks.”

Wonderful. Just in time for Christmas. And with a full guarantee thrown in.

Honohan Says Irish Banks For Sale (Irish Times)

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXOKtr3lDOY&feature=player_embedded

We have no idea. If anyone has any suggestions…

Having invited Brian Cowen onto his show for the umpteenth time in three years, and had the invitation turned down yet again, Vincent Browne turned up at the press conference in Government Buildings last night and comprehensively pwned the taoiseach.

The highlights:

VB: You don’t think that you’ve contributed to the screwing up of this country?

BC: I don’t accept your contention – the premise of your question – that I am the bogey-man you’re looking for, no.

VB: Who else in public office bears anything like the responsibility for the devestation caused to this country than you?

BC: I don’t accept that…etc.

VB: The reality is – and everybody but you seems to know this – you’re a liability, not just to your party, not just to your government, but to the country, because nobody believes you…people know you’re the guy most responsible for the chaos that’s been caused. Don’t you owe it as an act of patriotism to the Irish people to get out now?

BC: Sorry Vincent I don’t accept the premise of what you’re saying…

You will recall Vincent handed Bertie Ahern his own ass in 2007:

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6tQN6H_tVY

Meanwhile, back in the editing room.

YouTube still from lecraic/Video from irishforfecksake