Tag Archives: tax


Our code monkey Karl has just released a preliminary calculator for Budget 2013.

Sez Karl:

There is already a vague shape to what will be announced in another austerity-laden budget. Joan Burton has been making noises about changing (read: increasing) employee and employer PRSI rates. An increase from the current rate of 4% to 5% would result in an extra €293.96 on the tax bill of someone on the average industrial wage.

Another proposal is that a parent earning over €100,000 would have their child benefit taxed.  At that level of earnings though it makes minimal difference with just €688.80 a year for a single child clawed back. Given that successive governments have failed to implement this don’t hold your breath.

And another big change is the full implementation of the property tax. The rate has yet to be announced, but 0.5% of the property’s value has been mooted by the IMF.  You can be hopelessly optimistic and set the rate at a low of 0.05% (paying €50 per €100K of value) to an eye-watering high of 1% (paying €1,000 per €100K).

As more rumours surface, I will factor in the inevitable misery onto the calculator. Enjoy.

Check you income here: Budget 2013 Calculator

Remember this guy?

Padraig O’Shea, the school owner who refused admission to a pregnant girl in Borrisoleigh, Co. Tipperary because he had to “uphold morals” in the classroom?

Well, he’s appeared on the Revenue defaulters list for undeclaring income tax in the sum of €705,000 [with interest and whatnot].

Seven hundred thousand and five euros.

Here’s how it went down:

O’SHEA, PÁDRAIG “BORRISOLEIGH, THURLES,” CO. TIPPERARY. PRIVATE SCHOOL OPERATOR €346,059.00 €100,016.00 €259,544.00 €705,619.00 “Underdeclaration of Income Tax. Revenue Deposit Interest Reporting Case.”

Hat tip to @JeremyTaxman 

Previously: The School That Refused To Enrol A Teenage Mother

An analysis carried out by the Revenue on the 2010 tax year shows the average effective tax paid by the highest earners increased from 5 per cent in 2006 to its stated target of 30 per cent four years later.

It meant this group of 387 individuals earning more than €400,000 paid an additional €53 million in tax in 2010, almost double the amount of tax they would have paid that year had the new restrictions not been in place.

Six years ago, analysis by the Revenue of the tax returns of the 400 highest earning individuals showed a substantial majority were paying zero tax or tax of 10 per cent or less.

 

2006. *sigh* Good times.

High earners paying more tax as reliefs cut (Harry McGee, Irish Times)

pic

Minister for Communications Pat Rabbitte said he wanted no “red line” areas in discussions.

Sorry, what?

Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform Brendan Howlin said he would not be “prescriptive” in discussions on the budget for next year.

Come again?

Both tax rises and welfare cuts were trenchantly ruled out by the Government for last year’s budget. However, to fulfil its pledges in the EU-IMF bailout the Government has to make cuts of €3.5 billion next year.

So…

The comments by the two Labour Ministers have raised speculation that both areas are back on the budget agenda.

Oh great.

Ministers won’t rule out tax rises (Irish Times)

(Photocall Ireland)

The Independent TD’s statement to the Dail this evening

I would like to thank the party whips and the government for giving me the opportunity to speak today. In relation to my company’s under-declaration of VAT in 2009, M&J Wallace Ltd sold apartments in 2008 and 2009 and the proceeds from the closings of the sales were pledged to the bank. Normally, the business cash flow would have allowed us to deal with the VAT liability but not on this occasion. In early 2008, the company had got the go ahead to build a large project on the North Circular Road, which gave confidence in its potential to go forward.

Towards the end of the year, the bank pulled the plug on the project. This meant serious and unforeseen cash flow problems for the company. M&J Wallace Ltd had committed a lot more money to the project than it ultimately received from the bank, it had to let some men go, pay redundancy, it was coming under pressure for payment from suppliers and subcontractors, and having to deal with four banks becoming increasingly aggressive. The company was not able to pay the VAT at the time but was convinced that it was possible to work our way through the crisis. M&J Wallace Ltd believed that the company would be able to pay the full amount within six to twelve months.

It was feared that if the problem was revealed at that time that either the Revenue or the banks would have moved against the company and put it out of business. The manner in which the VAT was dealt with was, in hindsight, an error of judgment made under pressure at a time when the approach of the banks was changing dramatically and the value of property was dropping sharply. There was never an intention that the money that was owed would not be paid to Revenue and the motive behind the underpayment was to delay payment in order to trade out of difficulty.

Few at the time predicted that the country’s economic woes would continue as long as they have. We were never big developers which meant that we did not go into NAMA as the company’s debts were not large enough with the Irish banks, most money being owed to foreign banks, which are not subject to State guarantee and who have been more aggressive in their pursuit of debts as a result. The company had traded successfully for twenty years and it meant so much to me. People have said that if M&J Wallace Ltd had not under-declared its VAT, the Revenue would have worked with the company and maybe that is true – hindsight is a great thing –  though at the time it appeared that flexibility was in short supply.

The following year 2010, the situation had continued to deteriorate and the company made a full declaration to the Revenue and opened its books. The Revenue then proceeded to carry out a full audit of the company’s books and after some weeks, an agreement was reached between both parties whereby a sum of money would be paid each month by the company to the Revenue to deal with the outstanding amount, and all other ongoing tax liabilities would be honoured. When I stood for election in February 2011, I personally had a tax clearance cert, and so too did M&J Wallace Ltd as it was meeting the terms of its arrangement with the Revenue.

The company was sourcing work, paying the Revenue, paying off as many subcontractors and suppliers as possible, and this continued to be the case up until November 2011 when, following a €19.4 million judgment against the company by ACC Rabobank, M&J Wallace Ltd was no longer able to get work due to the judgment. I should add that all payments regarding PAYE, PRSI, pensions and redundancy were made but unfortunately the VAT and a number of subcontractors were left being owed money.

I have strived to demonstrate the distinction between my personal tax affairs and those of the limited company M&J Wallace Ltd. In legal and company terms, they are two separate entities, something which everyone in business will recognise, and without which no one would ever risk enterprise. I understand that many people do not see it this way. My personal tax affairs are in order and, for twenty years, M&J Wallace Ltd paid all taxes due, until the company found itself in its recent troubles and failed to meet the VAT obligation in question. In view of the fact that I now work for the people, and am paid by the people, I feel obliged to look beyond the bounds of company law. I understand that many people suffering under vicious austerity were upset by my statement last week that M&J Wallace Ltd would not be able to repay the tax debt – this was not a cavalier comment but rather an honest statement of fact.

I understand that PAYE workers and social welfare recipients are not afforded this flexibility, although life for most people in small and medium sized business is far from rosy either. In solidarity with the citizens of this country I will strive to personally make repayments in relation to the tax debt of M&J Wallace Ltd, and to this end, starting immediately, I am taking steps to organise for half of my Dáil salary to go towards paying M&J Wallace Ltd’s VAT liability with the Revenue.

I have been told that I have not presented my case well and that I should have hired a PR company to help me make my presentation. Rightly or wrongly, that hasn’t been my way of doing things.  I didn’t come in here today to defend the indefensible – the company under-stated its VAT liability and we were wrong to do so.

I want to apologise and say sorry to all the people who expected more from me, I want to apologise to the members of this Dáil for bringing any dishonour on a profession which hardly needed it, I want to especially apologise to the people of Wexford – I went home last weekend and found it hard to believe the support that I was given, the manner in which people can find it in themselves to offer support to somebody who has done something wrong, and who is down – it would boost anyone’s faith in human nature. I want to apologise to people all over Ireland, particularly to those who have supported and continue to support me and no matter what happens,

I will never forget them. I have done many things in my life that I should not have done, and now I have disappointed many people who believed in me.

Some members of this Dáil have suggested that I should resign the seat for a mistake made by the company M&J Wallace Ltd before I was elected. Have I considered resigning and running in a by-election? Yes, I have. Have I considered resigning and walking away from politics for good? I certainly have. But I was never very good at quitting. I did go into politics with a desire to work for social justice, to challenge the lack of fairness that exists in our society, and to strive to make this country a better place to live, for all of us.

I am grateful for the support I have received from the small and medium sized business community who know how difficult things can be and what the pressures of business can be like. As well as support from small business people, I have been greatly heartened by the many messages of support from all over Ireland in general and from Wexford in particular.

As a TD for Wexford, I feel privileged to have met so many wonderful people living quietly extraordinary lives and worked with them on many issues such as Cuts to Special Needs Assistants, Resource Teachers and guidance counsellors, Problems with the Domiciliary Care Allowance and the Carer’s Allowance, Changes to the One Parent Family Payment, and a host of other issues – in short, it is an honour and a privilege for me to represent the people of Wexford. They say that those of us who speak out should be above reproach, but I would be at pains to stress that I will never be that. I’m just another human being who is very far from being perfect and will remain so. 

I am answerable to the people of Wexford who elected me and they will discard me when they see fit, it is their seat not mine. In the meantime, I will strive to serve them, and all the people of Ireland, as well as I can.”

(Sam Boal/Photocall ireland)

 

THIS, etc.

THREE PROPERTY owners have paid between €30,000 and €40,000 through multiple liabilities for the controversial €100 household charge, Minister for the Environment Phil Hogan has confirmed. The three own between 300 and 400 properties that were liable for the charge.

Meanwhile, back in the real world…

As of noon last Friday, some 940,437 households, or 59 per cent of the estimated 1.6 million eligible, had paid the charge. Separate Department figures show that 24,098 people have paid penalties for late payment of the charge so far. These late payment penalties have raised €267,039.

 

Three property owners have paid over €30,000 in household charges (Irish Times)

 

This household charge is a Statute, otherwise known as an Act of Government and only carries the force of law upon you if you consent to it which means that you’re legally obliged to pay if you consent or in other words go on to householdcharge.ie and register.

Your silence and inaction will also give the appearance of consent. If you do not consent, a Statute cannot affect you in any way whatsoever.

 

Household Charge – How To legally Avoid Paying It (IrelandOnItsKnees)

Thanks Lisa Sheppard