Tag Archives: Asylum Seekers

DirectProvisionFacts1 (1)

DirectProvisionFacts2

DirectProvisionFacts3

Thérèse McKenna is a freelance journalist and a MA student in Motion Graphics at Letterkenny Institute of Technology in Donegal.

She writes:

“Children of asylum seekers in direct provision are unseen and unheard – this piece considers how a child might see things, or what life feels like for a little person stuck in that system. I made it as part of my MA in Motion Graphics at Letterkenny Institute of Technology – because I wanted more people to know about this situation and I hoped that telling the story visually might bring it to a wider audience. It’s no way to live.”

In the video, the child’s voice is that of Joanna Siewierska, while the male voiceover is that of Niall Crampton.

Visit irishrefugeecouncil.ie to learn more about direct provision and to find out how you can help.

End Institutional Living

Therese McKenna

asylumex

Irish Refugee Council writes:

This exhibition marks one year since the national day of action last year which called for an end to the institutional accommodation of people seeking international protection in Ireland…The main focus and aim of the exhibition is to raise awareness about the human cost of the current system, in particular the impact on children who are growing up within it.

‘One year on, and still no change’ Photography Exhibition (Irish Refugee Council)

Previously: Let’s Give Them Home

Asylum Seekers on Broadsheet

1027016 7102734 7672468

Above: examples of unused spaces within direct provision accommodation for asylum seekers in Ireland.

Eamon Sheehy of Migrate To The Fringe writes:

The asylum system functions as a closed and confined space far from the rest of society. It is the other, the outside, and a ghetto. The direct provision hostels and their residents don’t seem to have physicality. The rest of society is not to be concerned about their existence. Asylum Archive is taking visual samples of this reality…

UPDATE:

Over on the Human Rights In Ireland blog, Dr Liam Thornton writes:

“Direct provision is 14 years old today. Today, from 7am to 9pm, there will be 14 hours of blog posts on the issue of direct provision. The voices of asylum seekers themselves are central to this blog carnival, and we will hear their voices throughout the day. The Department of Justice and Department of Social Protection were invited to contribute to this carnival, however they have not replied to my email. Therefore, posts from several organisations working with and on behalf of asylum seekers, social workers, others challenging this system and artists, are all present.”

Human Rights In Ireland (#directprovision14)

Aussiepic

The slogan for a new campaign by Australian authorities aimed at deterring asylum seekers. The Guardian is reporting that the campaign has been launched on the country’s Department for Immigration and Border Protection website and on on its Customs and Border Protection website.

Alternatively.

Here’s a video from Pivotal Arts, called Burden Of Proof, about a mother and son’s journey to Ireland in search of asylum.

refugeevid

Watch the video here.

Australian government launches new graphic campaign to deter asylum seekers (The Guardian)

Pivotal Arts

Thanks Mark Geary

ascaravan
[Direct provision accommodation centre for asylum seekers in Lissywoolen, Athlone, Co. Westmeath]

Last night, Prime Time looked at the system of direct provision, posing the question: is the system unfair or a necessary deterrent?

Direct provision is the institutional system which includes accommodation, meals and a personal allowance of €19.10 per adult and €9.60 per child, per week, to asylees. They are not allowed to work. An EU directive would allow asylees to work in Ireland but the State declined to sign it.

Many have been waiting for over seven years in accommodation centres, such as the one in in Lissywoolen, above, for their application to be processed.

New rules to be introduced this year should see the application process speeded up for the  4,600 or so asylees that are currently in Ireland – approximately 1,700 of whom are children with many living in the direct provision system all their lives.

On Prime Time last night, reporter Tanya Sillem said a confidential Government briefing paper said the biggest concern about any alternative reception system would be the ‘pull factor’, basically a better system could attract more asylees.

Meanwhile…

Charlie

During the programme, Fine Gael TD Charlie Flanagan, above, defended the State’s direct provision system, saying:

“They can’t earn money. They can’t earn, if you like, a living. What the State does is provides a sum of €19 a week. Of course it’s insufficient but this is the direct provision regime. We have to ensure that Ireland is not an attractive place for applicants to arrive on our shores in numbers that perhaps we simply couldn’t afford or that we couldn’t cope with.”

“I wouldn’t regard [direct provision] as a deterrent. I would recognise that there is a pull factor. That if we have a very attractive regime – where people can come in, sign up for very attractive social welfare rates on day one, that pull factor is going to be realised and we will have a challenge as a State, we’d find it very, very difficult to cope with.”

Watch here

Shatter

DPdeaths

Yesterday, in the Dáil, Justice Minister Alan Shatter, top, responded to the Irish Times’ articles on the direct provision system, which reported on unpublished inspection reports into the system which caters for asylum seekers.

During his response he said:

“There was mention in the article of suicides being covered up. That is untrue. In the 14 years of RIA’s existence only one person, a newly-arrived asylum seeker, can with certainty be said to have committed suicide and that happened while the individual was being detained in hospital. It did not happen in one of the centres.”

 

However.

In July of this year, replying to a question from Labour TD Derek Nolan, Mr Shatter provided the above table to show the number of asylum seekers who have died while residing in the direct provision system.

It has always been the case that the Reception Integration Agency, which runs direct provision, does not and cannot have access to death certificates, leading to very little being known about these deaths.

In 2011 – at which point there had been 49 deaths and the one known suicide – Sue Conlon, of the Irish Refugee Council told Metro Éireann newspaper of her concern surrounding the unknown cause of the deaths.

The paper reported:

“[Sue Conlon] continued: ‘Residents in direct provision live in conditions that are not designed as long-term living space, where they have no control over meals… and can be transferred without consultation.  In these circumstances, residents become de-skilled, isolated from society and often suffer poor health, including mental health. It is not surprising that so many have died’. Conlan said it is “of grave concern that so little is known about the cause of death” of the 49 “and how the whole experience in direct provision may have contributed to the deterioration in their health”.

From the same article:

“Pastor Amos Ngugi of Act of Compassion Ministries – which voluntarily works with asylum seekers experiencing emotional problems – said he couldn’t comment on whether the RIA statistic denoting one suicide was accurate.”

“He said he had heard rumours which suggested more than one suicide, but stressed he could not yet substantiate this.” 

“However, the Kenyan-born pastor and former hospital chaplain noted that depression – which in severe cases can lead to suicide – is a “major issue” in RIA accommodation centres.”

“What I do know 100 per cent is that depression is a major problem,” he remarked.”

Separately, but related, in the Irish Refugee Council’s report State-sanctioned Child Poverty and Exclusion, it told how:

In 2010, Perpetua, a woman who was six months pregnant miscarried her twin babies while living in the Eglinton Hotel in Galway. She believes the miscarriage was caused by the stress of living in Direct Provision without enough space, privacy or quiet to sleep at night. She shared her room with her five-year-old daughter and another mother and her 18-month-old son.

It also reported how in 2007:

“The Connacht Sentinel reported on the death of Brenda Kwesikazi Mohammed, an asylum-seeker, and mother of a two-year-old daughter, living in the Eglinton Hotel in Galway. The Sentinel reported that Brenda died of malnutrition.”

 

State sanctioned child poverty and exclusion (Irish Refugee Council)

Oireachtas debates (October 9, 2013)

Previously: “Issues Too Extensive To Catalogue Individually”

Aine

Earlier this afternoon, Aine Ní Chonaill spoke to Joe Duffy on Liveline.

Ms Ní Chonaill launched the Immigration Control Platform in Ennis, Co. Clare in January, 1998. A few months prior to that, the West Cork teacher stood in the June 1997 general election on an anti-immigration ticket, gaining 293 votes in Cork South-West.

She also ran for Dublin South Central in the 2002 election, above, where she gained 926 votes.

Ms Ní Chonaill featured on show as a follow-up to yesterday’s programme, during which an asylum seeker from Syria, called Ali, talked to Joe about the six years he lived in an accommodation centre in Dublin.

From their conversation:

Áine Ní Chonaill: “Anyone who abuses the asylum system, just as a way to get to the West, and it is massively abused, is an invader of our country.”

Joe Duffy: “An invader?”

Ní Chonaill: “Anyone who barges their way into your country, against your will…”

Duffy: “Now it’s not my, your country. I mean who’s country is it?”

Ní Chonaill: “This is the country of Irish people. Do you think I’m making some exception of myself…”

Duffy: “You don’t own it?”

Ní Chonaill: “I beg your pardon?”

Duffy: “We don’t own the country, when you say ‘your country’.”

Ní Chonaill: “We most certainly do own our country. If you think we don’t own our own country, Joe, you’ve got a very big problem.”

Duffy: “Maybe I have. They’re invaders?”

Ní Chonaill: “Anyone who is an illegal immigrant, ‘i’ ‘double l’, illegal, or I add on an asylum abuser is such a person.”

Duffy: “OK. What is the purpose of this invasion?”

Ní Chonaill: “To get to live in the West.”

Duffy: “Yeah, and do they want to rob anything off you or me or pillage or rape or…”

Ní Chonaill: “Well, excuse me, they want to rob from…”

Duffy: “Because invaders usually come because they want to rob, pillage, rape, overthrow…”

Ní Chonaill: “I beg…If you want to use that kind of language, go right ahead.”

Duffy: “But what do invaders do?”

Ní Chonaill: “Invaders are people who say, effectively, I’m coming into your country whether you like it or not.”

Duffy: “To do what? To do what?”

Ní Chonaill: “To be here.”

Duffy: “In your house?”

Ní Chonaill: “In our country.”

Duffy: “In your house?”

Ní Chonaill: “In our country which is our communal home. Are you trying to say that the country doesn’t have the right to say who comes into the country?”

Duffy: “Of course it does, of course it does.”

Ní Chonaill: “Well that’s all I’m talking about.”

Duffy: “I’m just saying…I’m trying to get a glimpse, cause you’re coming across with phrases like ‘invader’, I’m trying to get a glimpse of what you’re saying, what you actually think of Ali and people like it.”

Ní Chonaill: “Well, obviously, I don’t know any circumstances, what I do know…”

Duffy: “Well, we heard them, we heard them yesterday, directly from his own mouth.”

Ní Chonaill: “No, no, no. Excuse me, Joe. Excuse me Joe. We never on what basis Ali asked for asylum. He came in 2006, when Syria was…”

Duffy: “Because he wanted to get out of Syria.”

Liveline (RTÉ)

Elections Ireland

asylumThornton

“What many in human rights organisations suspect (or are afraid to admit openly) is that Irish society knows full well about the system of direct provision, the vast majority of the population could not care less.

In fact, the vast majority may even want a harsher system…Politicians in the Dáil have said to me, over the years, that their work on direct provision is costing them support.

Not just a few votes here and there, but very noticeable support.”

 

Dr Liam Thornton, of UCD writing on Humanrights.ie in response to revelations in today’s Irish Times about the conditions faced by asylum seekers in Ireland.

Dr Thornton has compiled a timeline to show how the Irish legal and political systems and have been made aware of the problems with direct provision.

He writes:

“Depressingly, as before, Irish society ignores, punishes and demonizes ‘problematic’ populations. So as to prevent societal amnesia being claimed, this timeline provides a resource to show what Irish society has known since the introduction of direct provision.”

 

Read the timeline here

Earlier: “Issues Too Extensive To Catalogue Individually”