tt-1 tt-2 tt-3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Na_Ea4GsZ7M

[Top: the Pigeon House, Dublin’s original Power station transformed into post-apocalypse London for Reign of Fire (2002) and above trailer of same]

Looks like Reign.

Ger writes:

For the week that’s in it. Oscar-winning Matthew McConaughey, Christian Bale and Gerard Butler in underrated Disney actioner made in Wicklow and Dublin in the Summer of  2001. The most-expensive Irish-made flop ever??

Anyone?

Pics via TeamFix

photo-233

Further to the Mount Anville halting site brouhaha.

A leaflet distributed by Fine Gael local election candidate Josepha Madigan yesterday.

Anon writes:

Dear Ms Madigan…I am a resident of Goatstown. Your lack of detail and ill informed literature leads me to believe that you have given this matter no further consideration than a cheap populist attempt to drum up some anti-traveller sentiment in advance of your election campaign.

I couldn’t let this opportunity pass without taking the time to say a definition of racism is someone who believes that members of different races and ethnic minorities should be treated differently. Your literature indicates to me that you think that members of the traveling community should be treated differently. That they should not be housed in your ward and the Council should simply find somewhere else for them to live.

Contrary to what you seem to believe, some voters in this constituency do seek political representation that is fair, non discriminatory and represents tolerance and acceptance of all races and ethnic minorities.

Travellers have been marginalized, rejected and told to move on in South County Dublin for decades. Clearly there continues to be a prevailing climate marginalizing Travellers in South County Dublin. Distributing Anti-Traveller literature such as this is offensive and I hope will be received with similar disdain by your constituents. I will most certainly be raising it at the local residents association and indeed the many other community groups and voluntary associations of which I am a member.

You criticised an unnamed Labour Party Councillor in your literature for being in favor of the proposed sites on the basis that “everyone deserves somewhere to live”, you said that you feel “such comments should be consigned to the past”, alas I fear that racist views and anti-Traveller literature such as the material you distributed and the political campaign under which you are running are sentiments that should be consigned to the past….

Josepha Madigan (Facebook)

Wes Anderson Illustraion LANDSCAPE rgb webann

[Fancy dress invite (top) and a ‘Budapest’ prop by Annie Atkins (above)]

Gavin Feiritear writes:

“Thought you might like to know about this exhibition of graphic props from Wes Anderson’s The Grand Budapest Hotel by local designer Annie Atkins (above) at Light House Cinema [Market Square, Smithfield, Dublin] from Friday 7th – 24th March.
“To launch the film and exhibition, Light House Cinema will host a Wes Anderson-themed fancy dress party (top)and late screening of The Grand Budapest Hotel on Friday 7th March.  Fans will get the chance to dress up as their favourite characters from any Wes Anderson film be it Tenenbaum, Zissou or Fantastic Mr Fox and enjoy some fancy dress fun from 8pm before experiencing the latest Wes Anderson film on the night.”

Wes Anderson Movie and Exhibition (Light House)

Previously: Broadsheet Trailer Park: The Grand Budapest Hotel

photography

[Alex Sapienza and one of his portraits using ‘traditional’ techniques]

Instagram or 19th Century methods?

YOU decide.

Liam Geraghty writes:

Old and new photographic techniques slug it out for the eyeballs of the 21st century on RTÉ Lyric fm’s Culture File [featuring damn hot Dublin-based analogue hipster photographer Alex Sapienza]Listen here:

stephen donnellybill

“Earlier this year the scandal known as Pantigate erupted. It was kicked off by comments made by Rory O’Neill on the Saturday Night Show. It was escalated by the response of those branded homophobes who consequently threatened RTE with litigation. RTE capitulated and paid over €85,000 to six individuals. Maybe they should and maybe they shouldn’t have paid out, but they did so because of a serious flaw in the current Broadcasting Act.

“Here’s what RTE’s managing director, said in a letter to staff: “Having regard for broadcasting compliance issues, the seriousness of the legal complaints, and the decision by the complainants not to accept RTÉ’s proposed remedies, we decided that a settlement was the most prudent course of action. Senior counsel was consulted and confirmed that the legal position was far from clear.”

“This bill is an attempt to clarify one legislative issue at the heart of the Pantigate episode. That is, the removal the term “offence” from Section 39 of the Broadcasting Act. As legislators, we have a duty to show the LGBT community, and society at large, that free speech is something that the Oireachtas values. Something that we can – and will – protect.

“The existing Act requires broadcasters to not broadcast ‘anything which may reasonably be regarded as causing harm or offence’. This Bill removes the wording ‘or offence’. I do not believe people should be censored for saying offensive things, whether or not that offence is reasonably caused, or not. Determining what might be considered offensive – by anyone in our society – is a pretty hefty obligation to put on our broadcasters. It’s especially difficult when it comes to live broadcasting. TDs know that offence is something some people are determined to take no matter what the topic. Legislation that molly coddles those likey to take offence – regardless of what they’re offered – gags free speech, Harms public debate, and makes uncomfortable truths, invisible truths.

“The Act as it currently stands, and the recent scandal, will undoubtedly cause broadcasters to err on the side of caution.

“As a result, if we don’t make this change, free speech will begin to suffer right away. And litigious bullies can shut down any conversation they deem inconvenient.

“What this bill proposes, therefore, is to remove the reference to offence. Section 39 (1) (d) would therefore read: Every broadcaster shall ensure that “anything which may reasonably be regarded as causing harm or as being likely to promote, or incite to, crime or as tending to undermine the authority of the State, is not broadcast by the broadcaster.”

“We’ve heard in the press the minister is thinking about changing “harm or offence” to “harm or reasonable offence”. Any qualification of the term offence still hamstrings our broadcasters.It is also potentially troublesome in relation to European law.

“Article 11 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights makes no reference to offence. Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which deals with freedom of expression, makes no reference to offence. RTE’s statement on respecting diversity is also at odds with the inclusion of ‘Offence’ in the legislation.

“Here’s what the statement says “As Ireland evolves into a more multicultural and ethnically diverse nation it is important that RTÉ reflects these changes. But equally programme-makers must be sensitive to areas of public opinion that are absent from public discourse because of the reticence of some people to express their views”.

“So we’re asking RTE not to broadcast anything that could cause offence, but at the same time to represent minority views, which we don’t often hear – which for whatever reason, may cause offense to some people in our society.

I look forward to seeing what the Minister brings forward, and hope to be able to support his proposals. However, the legislative process takes time. Were the Government to accept THIS Bill, it would almost immediately fix one of the biggest flaws in the legislation, and send a strong signal to broadcasters, minority groups, and those they offend, that Ireland values free speech.”

Independent TD Stephen Donnelly introducing an amendment.to the broadcasting act today.

FIGHT!

Thanks Steve Dempsey

Broadsheet.ie