annie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lgZWGJZHkGM

St. Vincent, Saturday February 22nd  @ Olympia Theatre, Dame Street, Dublin (€25)

Nialler9 writes:

Annie Clark [St Vincent] has been one of the more interesting and inventive musicians working within the confines of American alternative-rock of late, and her fourth album (streaming here) is her best work; a brash and bold record with tough fuzz-rock casings and brass bounce touches. In a live setting, she’s now a much more comfortable and fearless performer (no doubt helped by recent collaborator David Byrne) and the live show benefits greatly from it.

Nialler9’s Gig Guide February 18-24 (Nialler9)

intestine-tent-sculpture-by-andrea-hasler-designboom-07intestine-tent-sculpture-by-andrea-hasler-designboom-02intestine-tent-sculpture-by-andrea-hasler-designboom-06

An installation (running next month) by Swiss artist Andrea Hasler at the former site of the US  nuclear airbase at Greenham Common in Berkshire.

Referencing the Women’s Peace Camp of  the 1980s and the mutated consequences of nuclear radiation, the tents are made from polystyrene, wax, leather and blood.

Who would even stay in a tent like th….

intestine-tent-sculpture-by-andrea-hasler-designboom-05

Never mind.

designboom

asylum

[Part of a High Court  Judicial review into the case of A Sudanese doctor who was refused  asylum in Ireland]

The Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

They’ve done it again.

Mark Dennehy writes:

Judicial review judgements are generally dry documents, if important ones – you refer to them but you don’t generally find one you have trouble putting down while reading.
So when the High Court starts off a Judicial Review by saying “Sometimes the Court is called upon to review a decision which is so unfair and irrational and contains so many errors that judicial review seems an inadequate remedy to redress the wrong perpetrated on an applicant”, you know it’s going to make for horrible reading.
And when it goes on to say the applicant’s counsel acted with “With a degree of admirable restraint” because that counsel only objected to a decision because it was “irrational, unreasonable and reached in error of law, fact and fair procedures”, you get this image of a judge on the High Court who wants to get down off the bench and shove a gavel so far up some minor functionary that they could claim asylum from persecution themselves and gain some actual sympathy for the people they’re meant to be helping.
The applicant here is a doctor who treated Sudanese women who were at the time being raped as a state-sponsored tactic to suppress the local population.  He worked with MSF [Médecins Sans Frontières] to report this, he had to flee the country as a result, but was tracked down, had his surgery destroyed and was threatened by the Sudanese security forces, and later they came back for him, he ran with the aid of an NGO but was found, abducted, tortured, left for dead on the street afterwards, smuggled out of the country by friends and came here for asylum — and all of this was extensively documented and those documents presented in his asylum application — and then, to quote the High Court, “the only conclusion which the Court could draw for the Tribunal’s decision not to recommend that the applicant should be declared a refugee is that the Tribunal Member simply did not like the applicant.”

Judgement here

Related: The Refugee Appeals Tribunal in 2014 (Liam Thornton, HumanRights.ie)

Previously: Rescuing A Gay Refugee

You Couldn’t Make It Up

iphone

A writes:

I know you don’t normally do this but my phone was swiped from my coat pocket on Saturday night. Did the old ‘find my iPhone’ app next morning and sure enough there it is in a house on Dublin’s inner city.
My boyfriend [Eoghan] thought it would be a good idea to rock over to the house & confront the robber so that’s what we (he) did. I waited in the cab while he bravely hopped out & knocked on the door.
A chap opened up and Eoghan proceeded to tell him that my phone had been ‘mislaid’ and was showing up at that location. The guy asked what type of phone and then vanished back inside. Upon returning he presented Eoghan with the iPhone4 and claimed his female friend had found the phone the previous night.
We couldn’t believe it and even gave the guy a few quid for his, erm, honesty. We drove away, in amazement not quite sure what had just happened and then I clicked the home button…not my phone!
The phone in my hand, which read ‘No Service’ (meaning the owner had clearly had it blocked by the provider) belongs to a girl called Tess (see screen grab of homescreen above) Basically I’m looking for her to give her back her phone & build my courage to head back out there to retrieve my own phone…which is still showing up in his house!!

Anyone?

25294_53_blog_entries_5382_656x500

verrimuss

[Paul Williams, top, and british security firm Verrimus]

 

Further to the GSOC bugging brouhaha.

The Irish Independent’s Paul Williams went on RTE Radio One’s Today with Sean O’Rourke this morning to offer alternative explanations for the three security threats discovered by security firm Verrimus in the offices of the Garda Ombudsman’s Commission.

Paul Williams: “There was a wifi device which was located in the Commission’s conference room, it was found to have connected to an external wifi network. Now, our understanding is that a report was subsequently done by the security company to state that, in the first instance they didn’t know which external network it was, that was hitting off their system. They then later established that it was bitbuzz wifi network which was then traced to an insomnia coffee shop on the ground floor of the GSOC building.
We did some further enquiries. We discovered, significantly, that the bitbuzz network was, I understand, introduced to that premises in August of last year. If you walk in, you’re offered, it’s advertised, bitbuzz, you know, you’re given a number to hook into it while you’re in the Insomnia and in the Spar shop – they’re on the corner of Middle Abbey Street and Capel Street. So our understanding is that, and this is based on sources from very close, shall we say, to GSOC, that it was subsequently, this was subsequently discovered, it was reported back and it was reported on paper.
Now, for some reason, neither the Minister (for Justice) nor the Dail committee that met with the GSOC Commissioners last week were informed of this. Also, in relation to the phones, the third anomaly was the use of the UK 3G mobile network, it’s understood that the experts from the security company found this and said this could, and traced it to a much bigger threat. That somebody had an IMSI, it’s a technical term for, it’s like a sting, it’s called a stingray in the business but it’s an IMSI catcher – they believe that this equipment was in existence in the area, based on the fact that they detected a UK 3G network.
Now, in last week’s meeting with the Dáil committee on oversight, the chairman Simon O’Brien told the Oireachtas that he did not have a UK mobile but confirmed that we had UK operatives who were operating [inaudible] and now we asked GSOC yesterday to maybe further elaborate on that, they responded that no GSOC staff member uses a UK phone for official use but when asked to confirm who these UK operatives were they said they were the UK security specialists undertaking the sweep. So, in the confusion, it appears that perhaps they detected the existence of their own English mobile phones while that sweep was going on.”

Sean O’Rourke: “But how does this explain, Paul, this suggestion where the IMSI catcher as you call it, the briefing note said that the specialist firm Verrimus indicated that this level of technology is only available to government agencies and that’s what an awful lot of the concern arose from.”

Williams: “Well there’s another extraordinary sort of twist in this whole story. And this is my colleague Tom Brady yesterday in the Irish Independent revealed that Verrimus company, which was brought in to do this stress assessment actually met with senior gardaí while they were here on that trip and offered them this IMSI catcher for sale. And Verrimus yesterday confirmed this.”

O’Rourke: “Did the gardaí know why Verrimuss were in town? And what the main purpose of their visit was at that stage?”

Williams: “Well, I don’t think so. I don’t know. In that business you don’t tell your left hand what your right hand is doing.”

[Later]

Williams: “There is an element in our own profession and in particularly in the Opposition, this is being used as an opportunity to, another opportunity to whip the Commissioner, or the Commissioner, and the Minister.”

O’Rourke: “Yes, but equally, it could be suggested that there are elements in your own newspaper who are basically blind to the possibility that Gardaí may have done anything wrong because the line taken by the Irish Independent group has been largely very supportive of the Gardaí and fairly sceptical of GSOC and people who say there’s something afoot here.”

Williams: “I wouldn’t say it’s supportive. I would say, purely from the point of view, you take the story and look at it from a distance and you say, well, on the face of it, this is extraordinary…but when you start breaking it down, it is what if. This, if, for example Sean, you come along and you say that something really seismic had happened in an organisation or in somebody’s life, the first thing people ask is where is the proof and the evidence. The point about it was that we were looking at this and thinking ‘well hang on, there is no, no evidence has been proffered in relation to this.”

Listen Here

Alternatively, from Verrimus:

1620671_10152227044006941_1704395552_nOh.

Previously: Catchers And The Spies

Earlier: Garda Confidential

Broadsheet.ie