Category Archives: Misc

Co7CM0GWcAAkHS0

Co7HsuyWAAAdzgV

Further to the removal of Maser’s Repeal the 8th mural from outside the Project Arts Centre, Temple Bar, Dublin 2.

The Irish Council of Civil Liberties has erected replicas at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7 (above)

Fight!.

Pics: The HunReal Issues

Meanwhile…

Co7ICKSW8AEZtPu

Loughlin O’ Nolan writes:

Use of the –#repealthe8th hashtag. First asterisk is the day the mural was installed, second when it was removed.

Meanwhile…

project

These colours don’t run.

Greg McLaughlin writes:

To get around planning violations that prohibited a painted mural an ‘Augmented Reality Marker’ has been placed on the exact spot where the original mural stood.

When people view the marker on their android phones (iPhone version will be available soon) using the website 8mural.com they will see a digital version of the mural in situ on the wall.

The website will also allow people to print their own version of the digital marker that they can stick on their own (legally owned walls).

As this marker is effectively a poster it does not contravene any of the planning regulations that resulted in the DCC requesting that the original mural be removed.

8mural.com

anne-marie-291x300

From top: Facebook Likes, Illustration by Jennifer Daniel ; Anne Marie McNally

Maintaining a veil of privacy over your personal life – even on social media – has nothing to do with fear of scandal and everything to do with protection and the maintenance of clear lines of demarcation.

Anne Marie McNally writes:

The personal is political or so the saying goes. But is that, or should that be, the case? Isn’t it perfectly acceptable to want to keep some things beyond the scope of inevitable scrutiny that comes from being in the public eye?

Or is there a legitimate expectation that every part of a politician’s (or aspiring politician) life be laid bare as required by the media outlet of the day?

The question I raise concerns itself more with the intimate details of one’s life rather than any public pastimes so before the commentators get carried away telling me that they have a right to know if someone is a member of the KKK or engages in some other type of behaviour which is likely to have a direct impact on their role in the public eye, then yes, I agree – fair game.

My question however refers to the truly personal.

As a woman I am repeatedly asked about my family status, perhaps that’s the same for men but I can’t be sure. When someone asks you directly ‘do you have children’ is it acceptable to say ‘I’d rather not say?’ and if not, why not? The same argument applies to any relationship? So far I have tried, wherever possible to keep my two worlds separate.

Why? I’m not 100% sure to be honest but I do know this, the scrutiny that comes from being in the public eye is not always pleasant and I’m loathe to subject anyone to it who hasn’t specifically chosen it.

I’ve chosen it therefore I’m good with it but would it be fair for me to open others up to the possibility of attention they may not desire?

For a while now I’ve been left with the distinct impression that my evasiveness on those type of questions is somewhat unacceptable and other times I’ve felt judgement for some perceived ‘disowning’ on my behalf.

We’re lucky here in Ireland that we don’t have a tabloid media as feral as Britain’s. As such we’re devoid of the regular ‘scandals’ regarding the personal lives of public figures but that’s not to say we don’t get the gossip type columns where innuendo and subtle clues point to the identity of the person involved.

Then there’s social media where speculation and finger-pointing comes with the territory. That’s one side of the coin but the less salacious, less obvious reason for maintaining a veil of privacy over your personal life has nothing to do with fear of scandal and everything to do with protection and the maintenance of clear lines of demarcation.

I tried to keep my personal Facebook page personal, but the friend requests kept coming and I now have people on there who are more colleagues than friends and so I’ve adjusted the personal content pertaining to others in my life accordingly.

This may mean that you’ll only see photos of me socialising with political friends – it doesn’t mean I don’t spend the majority of my life with those not in my political world, it just means you won’t read about it on Facebook.

During the recent General Election campaign I had a hugely positive campaign and response but there were blips. Unfortunately a woman becoming so visible in public life will always bring slugs from beneath rocks and I had some really nasty emails from clearly disturbed individuals.

I had hate mail from people who wanted me to not exist; I had ‘fan’ mail from delusional men who thought they were in love with me; and I had one or two ‘lovely girl’ emails with embedded rape threats.

I’ve even had one ‘nice’ man go to the bother of sending me an email recently to tell me ‘my lovely bum is too round for politics’ – though he did clarify that statement with the bracketed disclaimer (‘that’s a compliment by the way’) – well that’s alright so, thanks for that.

I brushed those incidents, and other similar ones, off without much of a second thought, I know what comes with the territory but my family and friends did not and so my unwillingness to involve them in that side of my life is not me choosing to pretend they don’t exist.

it’s me refusing to open their existence up to the same level of scrutiny that I’ve signed up for.

Anne Marie McNally is a founding member of the Social Democrats. Follow Anne Marie on Twitter: @amomcnally

rocknroll

Friday August 5 – 7: Dublin Rock N Roll Festival @ Dame District/Whelan’s (Some free)

Nialler9 writes:

Formerly known as the Rock-N-Roll Conference, Dublin Rock-N-Roll Festival is a three-day event centered on retro rock’n’roll, rockabilly and all things vintage that go along with it: cars, pomp hairstyles and dance competitions.

Music wise, there are gigs in 10 venues from The Strypes, Donna Dunne, Slim Jim and the Bone Breakers, The Slick Hicks, The Dublin City Rounders, The Jive Cats, Mushburgers, Sunset Kings (USA) and more. Some gigs are free.

Nialler9’s Gig  Guide August 2-August 8 (Nialler9)

Screen Shot 2016-08-02 at 16.11.56Screen Shot 2016-08-02 at 16.33.10

From top: Senior Counsel for Denis O’Brien, Jim O’Callaghan (right), at Dublin Castle for the  Moriarty Tribunal in 2010 and Denis O’Brien

Mark Tighe, in The Sunday Times at the weekend, reported that Persona – which is suing the State and Denis O’Brien over the awarding of the mobile phone licence to the businessman in 1996 – has been allowed a “leapfrog appeal” to the Supreme Court.

It follows the High Court ruling in April that Persona – run by Tony Boyle and Michael McGinley – could not use funds from a third party, Harbour Litigation, to fund its case.

Mr Tighe reported:

The High Court ruled that Harbour had no direct interest in the case so its funding of Persona would breach the laws of champerty, a criminal offence.

Both the state and O’Brien opposed Persona’s attempt to appeal directly to the Supreme Court.

In O’Brien’s legal submission, signed by two senior counsel including Jim O’Callaghan, Fianna Fail’s spokesman on justice, it was denied that Boyle and McGinley needed financial assistance to run the case.

… Since the Court of Appeal was established in 2014 to handle a backlog of appeals from the High Court, the Supreme Court has restricted direct appeals to only those issues of “public importance” and cases with “exceptional circumstances”.

The state had argued Persona’s appeal did not concern a matter of general public importance.

Both O’Brien and the state also argued there was no urgency to the case, which involves allegations that Michael Lowry, as communications minister, improperly awarded the licence to O’Brien’s consortium 20 years ago.

In its determination the Supreme Court, comprising the chief justice Susan Denham, William McKechnie and Elizabeth Dunne, said in light of constitutional principles of access to the court and access to justice, they considered Persona raised issues of general public importance.

“This application is one where there is in essence a single legal issue of general public importance which transcends the interests of the parties before the court in these proceedings, namely the application of the doctrines of maintenance and champerty,” it said.

“As the application may involve the issue of access to justice, and access to the courts, it is a matter of significant importance. The court is satisfied it is a case where leave to appeal may be granted from the Court of Appeal.”

… The Persona appeal will now go into a case management process before the formal Supreme Court hearing.

O’Brien case leaps to Supreme Court (The Sunday Times)

Pics: Laura Hutton/Sasko Lazarov (Rollingnews)

lennon

It isn’t hard to see.

Trademark lawyer Brian Conroy writes:

Yesterday a trademark application was filed for EU wide protection for “John Lennon”. I immediately thought ‘unless whoever has applied for that is actually called John Lennon, I don’t fancy their chances of getting the trademarks across the line’,

Particularly because Yoko Ono was previously involved (to some extent anyway) in a trademark spat with a US Singer called Lennon Murphy – You can read more about that HERE… But happily it turns out  the application was made by Yoko…

John Lennon Trademarks – Yoko Ono Applies for John Lennon TMs (Brian Conroy)