

From top: January 2020 edition of The Economist; writer Michael O’Loughlin
This morning.
What do we want?
You’d want to be zipping it.
Via The Irish Times:
We all know, though some pretend not to, that Northern Ireland is not, and never has been, and never will be, an integral part of the UK in the way that Tunbridge Wells is. Why else did the British government give unionists their own government and state in 1921, and not the Scots and the Welsh? But the fact that unionists are so delusional about the past century does not invalidate their emotions. They have a right not to live in a united Ireland.
When Irish nationalists talk about “reuniting” Ireland, what do they mean? When was Ireland ever “united” except in the context of British rule? So what would a united Ireland actually look like? A Republic writ large? A Christy Moore fantasy of Irish ways and Irish laws? At this stage so many people have killed for, or been killed for, a united Ireland that it has become a tainted concept.
If you really want a united Ireland, based on unity rather than head counts, now is the time to stop talking about it.
Um.
FIGHT!
We Need To Stop Talking About A United Ireland (Michael Loughlin, Irish Times)