This morning.

Via Irish Times Letters:

Across the sea in the UK, a recent Employment Appeal Tribunal found that having “gender critical” views is protected in law. This case was brought by a woman, Maya Forstater, as she was defending the view that biological sex is real after losing her job.

After the judgment, Ms Forstater’s solicitor made a statement “institutions that might have been expected to support women’s political organisation have been almost without exception conspicuous either by their absence, or by their active hostility”.

He brought a spotlight on Amnesty Ireland: “Amnesty Ireland went furthest of all by putting its name to a statement calling for people with Gender Critical beliefs to be ‘denied legitimate political representation’. Even typing that sentence feels implausible. Maya Forstater’s success demonstrates the irrelevance of these institutions. They are at risk of redundancy”.

But Amnesty Ireland was not alone in calling for women with gender critical views to have their right to representation removed.

Our very own National Women’s Council of Ireland also signed the letter calling for our rights to be removed, as did many other organisations.

The NWCI is in receipt of State funding. Does a State-funded body really have the right to call for the removal of rights from women who believe in the reality of biological sex?

Does the NWCI really have the right to abandon women because they do not share the same beliefs as the NWCI?

Sarah Anderson,
Newcastle,
Co Wicklow.

Irish Times Letters

Previously: Hear Me Roar

Last night.

Duiblin Bay South By-Election Sinn Féin candidate Lynn Boylan canvassing in Dublin 12. The date for the upcoming Dublin Bay South By Election was announced yesterday as July 8.

Meanwhile…

Last night.

Irish Times poll: Sinn Féin hits record high as Fine Gael drops among voters (Irish Times)

Leah Farrell/RollingNews

This morning.

To celebrate the re-opening of cinemas across Ireland…

…Mark at Jam Art Factory writes:

We thought Broadsheet readers would be interested in a competition for a set of 2 A4 signed “old Irish cinema prints” by Paddy Duffy.  The winner can choose from Paddy’s wide range of  cinemas here

To enter, just share with us your most memorable Irish cinema experience…

Lines MUST close at 6pm.

Jam Art Prints

Jam Art Factory

Last night.

Baggot Street, Dublin 2.

Flashy new signage and name?

Barry H writes:

The Kebap Connection! Ismael what have you done?

Ismael has fed many a happy/pissed punter who had just left The Baggot Inn over the years.

What is this nonsense?

Anyone?

The Cabinet yesterday approved the general scheme of a Circular Economy Bill 2021 that will drastically change production and consumption; Dan Boyle

It is probably one of the less highlighted pieces of promised legislation coming from the agreed programme for government, but it may yet be one of the most significant to be approved in this Dáil.

The Circular Economy Bill seeks to give a statutory basis to those areas that have only been given lip service to in recent decades.

If we are to make any dent into the amounts of carbon we produce, how we create and ultimately dispose of waste, is key to how we can reduce and hopefully then eliminate many of these problems.

In my first incarnation as a city councillor I had an ongoing argument with the City Engineer over the council’s landfill site.

My campaigning on the existence and management of this landfill had been one the key issues in my first election campaign. Then and on being elected I argued for what were still novel concepts of reducing and recycling waste.

He argued that to seek to reduce waste would have a negative economic impact. He spoke proudly that statistics showed increases in economic growth were directly linked to the rate of increase in the amount of waste being produced.

Damn statistics. Similar reasons dominated official thinking for years, that to reduce carbon emissions would be to also affect economic progress. A collective official stupidity that has stymied action on climate for many years.

My argument with the City Engineer, along with the campaign to close the City’s landfill site went on for too many years. Eventually it was closed. It has since been converted into a public park. I like to think that this conversion is a nice metaphor that can be used to encourage other positive policy change.

Despite movement in a better direction which has seen some stabilisation, Ireland still remains back of the class in Europe with the highest rate of waste per capita in the EU.To date there has been a lack of political will in Ireland to effectively regulate the production process of goods, to seek the measure the life cycle of goods.

We have been, and continue to be, in thrall to an approach to consumption that seeks immediate gratification and an ask no questions approach to disposal.

Food for thought in all of this is how we consume food. We produce so much meat, much of which we export. Yet we import 40% of the vegetables we consume. Added to this mismatch in how we produce food is what happens when we prepare food to eat. One third of food prepared in Ireland doesn’t get eaten and is thrown away.

It requires major cultural changes to alter this approach. There needs to be a greater emphasis on repairing goods rather than replacing them. If there are by products that come from consuming goods, greater effort needs to be made to repurpose them as raw materials for other production processes.

Most needed are statutory requirements to bring us to where we need to get to. That is why this bill is so important.

It gets the balance right. It defines what we need to leave behind, fossil fuels in particular. It rewards positive behaviour, such as in bottle deposit schemes. It incentivises innovation.
It is important that positive messages outweigh any perceived negative ones.

There are still hearts and minds to be won. Still deep seated prejudice to be overcome. Although on many of these issues the general public is already ahead of official Ireland. Many opening doors can be pushed further with this bill.

Not to do so would be such a waste.

Dan Boyle is a former Green Party TD and Senator and serves as a Green Party councillor on Cork City Council. His column appears here every Thursday. Follow Dan on Twitter: @sendboyle

Chinese astronauts Nie Haisheng, Liu Boming, and Tang Hongbo at the Jiuquan launch center in northwestern China

China’s once more in the race
To put more people up in space
So let’s hope the crew
Called Nie, Tang and Liu
Have fun in their orbital base

John Moynes

AP

An artificial skin cover for smartphones developed by Marc Teyssier and his colleagues at Telecom Paris. To wit:

Currently limited to smartphones, smartwatches, and touchpads, the prototype is responsive to a variety of gestures, including pinching, tickling, and poking, responding to different emotions: sudden, hard pressure is associated with anger, while gentle and sustained stroking is associated with providing comfort.

Oh dear.

sad&useless

Broadsheet.ie