‘sup?

This morning.

Derek Haughton writes:

Anyone know what the hell this is? [It’s a baby seagull: see comments]. Poor thing is calling out for its mammy on the path at the Drimnagh Luas stop. Size 7 (shoe*) for scale.

Anyone?

* Possibly slippers (see comments).

From top: railings at the Jellicoe Avenue entrance of Grove Park in north Belfast; Colm Dore

Among the statues of supremacists which have fallen in recent days, that of King Leopold of Belgium points to the lie that people in the past didn’t understand supremacism.

Roger Casement became famous for his exposure of injustice in colonial Congo under Leopold. He also lived the maxim that all politics is local, as his concern for justice fed his interest in Irish culture as it, too, struggled to emerge from a long history of colonial subordination.

The GAA’s promotion of Irish sports was part of that emergence. Casement was one of the organisers of the inaugural Feis na Gleann in his home place, County Antrim,

in 1904. A tenant farmer offered to host the playing of Gaelic games but this angered his Unionist landlord whose threats meant that the only available field was overgrown with weeds. There is a metaphor-ready photograph of Casement taking a scythe to it in order to enable its use.

The statue protests articulate the view that there has been, and remains, a denial of power relations: a denial of present-day disparity and its historical roots. To borrow an expression from James Baldwin – a failure to corroborate the reality people are living.

June 15 saw the display of an exclusionary, supremacist, banner and graffiti at Belfast City Council’s Grove park in north Belfast. They threatened users of the public park who might be identified with Irish sports.

This was a crude expression of an ugly reality which is both denied and enabled by mainstream discourse which perpetuates the very disparity which prompted the creation of the GAA in the first place.

This is the disparity which treats Irish culture as though it doesn’t belong in the north-east of Ireland. It’s the politics which deems the visibility of the indigenous language to be “divisive” there. Like an iceberg, this politics is visible to some extent, but below the surface to a large extent.

It’s uninterrogated in the framing of discussions which accept – as a starting premise – that the political acceptability of inclusivity in the north (e.g. bilingual signage to include the indigenous language) has to be looked at by presenting “both sides”.

Inclusion and rejection of inclusion are presented as equivalent positions, with the purportedly neutral position favouring the status quo by “not taking sides”.

Angela Davis has said that neutrality on disparity is siding with disparity. That presents a challenge for purported centrists in the north who (with the support of Dublin establishment parties) stand to benefit from “both sides” false equivalence.

Discourse in the north-east has these characteristics because it wasn’t arrived at in a vacuum. It’s a product of unequal, historically-rooted, power relations.

On foot of a complaint from the Unionist Stormont regime, BBC radio simply stopped reporting GAA results.

The embedded longevity of that culture was such that BBCNI didn’t broadcast any GAA on television until the ‘90s, even though Ulster championship matches routinely attracted attendances larger than the populations of County towns like Omagh, Armagh, and Enniskillen.

BBCNI has never broadcast a camogie or hurling match. These cannot be dismissed as matters of broadcasting rights.

In 2018, that station’s drivetime radio programme featured an extended discussion of what winning the Superbowl meant to the people of Philadelphia. It has never had such a discussion about what reaching the hurling summit has meant in Galway and Limerick. Such discussions don’t require broadcasting rights.

In the north, the historically dominant traditions main daily newspaper continually gives credence to Unionist “concerns” about University students wearing GAA tops in lecture theatres. What politics does that feed?

Meanwhile, there are calls for leadership, for conspicuous opposition to the sort of supremacist hatred that catapulted Holy Cross primary school girls into global consciousness twenty years ago.

Even in that case, the existence of supremacism was equivocated about by respectable voices in Ireland, north and south, while instantly recognised by global audiences who saw powerful resonance with the ordeal of little Ruby Bridges in 1960s New Orleans.

This, too, points to a challenge for centrists who decry “our local squabble”, yet simultaneously reduce it to a mere provincial matter by refusing to characterise it in terms with which they would immediately characterise expressions of supremacist exclusion abroad.

The problem that Casement had, the problem cultivated under the old Stormont regime, still stands. Denial of its existence makes it difficult to address.

Colm Dore is a Belfast-based political commentator who has appeared on BBCNI radio and television programmes. Follow Colm on Twitter: @ColmDore

Top pic via Twitter

This morning.

Thanks, Paddy.

More as we get it.

Yesterday: Nursing Home Timeline

From top: Green Party Leader Eamon Ryan (left) and deputy leader Catherine Martin during the 2020 General Election; Dan Boyle

I have posted my vote.

In my 30 years of public life I have learned that the opportunity to achieve deep change comes about infrequently.  I know others in my party think differently. They are sincere in their beliefs, but I believe are mistaken in their analysis.

To me Climate Justice is Social Justice. Only by being in government can we advance social justice in ways that would not happen were we not to be there.

However much it is presented by some, a programme of government is not of itself, a legal document. It is a prospectus of what an agreed government seeks to bring into being in government.

Policies, goals and objectives that can only come about through approved and passed legislation. Legislation only gets passed by the Oireachtas through a government having a working majority.

You can doubt the trust and sincerity of those agreeing a programme of government, but without a programme and the forming of a government on its basis, no legislative change can occur.

The A Word is featuring strongly in the debate on whether or not The Green Party should enter government. Those advocating a No vote see austerity as a given, if the party participates.  The argument is augmented by stating the proposed programme for government brings this about.

There are many economic tools that can be used to work towards achieving a balanced budget, the last and least of which should be public expenditure cuts. The hope is that sustained increased economic activity continues bringing with it greater tax buoyancy.

This proposed Programme for Government does not promote or encourage austerity. It does the opposite.

We recover. We borrow. We invest. We stimulate. We sustain. If and when a balanced budget is achieved, some tax cuts might be possible, but that won’t be any time soon.

The difference between now and 2008/10 is significant. Then the Eurozone, the European Central Bank and influence of the German government were obsessed with balanced budgets. Now governments throughout Europe will be borrowing to invest to stimulate.

I am certain that the vast majority of people who voted for The Green Party in the general election want the party to be in government, enacting the policies that we Greens have been asking them to support, over the course of many, many elections.

This large majority of Green supporters recognise achievements in the proposed programme for government, while realising that many areas of Green policy are not included.

These supporters also accept that the component parties of this possible government are not naturally aligned.

This support goes beyond Green voters. It can also be seen and heard in the views expressed by environmental NGOs, social justice NGOs, and civil society NGOs. It is repeated by many academics who analyse and write about a wide area of public policy.

As a local public representative I see and hear these views being expressed by community groups, campaigning groups and by people involved in civic life. They largely tell me the same thing. They say we hope you take this opportunity to make a difference.

Today and tomorrow are the likely last days for Green Party members vote on the whether or not to participate in government.

To those who have yet to vote I would ask them to ask themselves one question. What decision on government best represents those who support The Greens?

Dan Boyle is a former Green Party TD and Senator and serves as a Green Party councillor on Cork City Council. His column appears here every Thursday. Follow Dan on Twitter: @sendboyle

Rollingnews

Deadly ‘Murder’ hornets from Asia measure up to 2 inches and can wipe out entire honeybee colonies within hours

One thing that we don’t want to see
Is the end of the poor honeybee
So promise you will
Go straight out and kill
A hornet or two or else three

John Moynes

Pic: BC Ministry of Agriculture

Broadsheet.ie