Tag Archives: gardai

This afternoon.

On RTÉ’s News at One.

RTÉ’s Crime Correspondent Paul Reynolds reported that two senior members of the Association of Garda Sergeants and Inspectors are not attending the group’s annual conference which began in Cavan today.

Mr Reynolds said the decision of AGSI’s vice president Paul Wallace and its deputy general secretary Antoinette Cunningham not to attend followed the news that one of its members if being investigated by the National Bureau of Criminal Investigations.

He told Claire Byrne on RTÉ’s News At One:

“The allegation is that the member engaged in prohibitive spare time activities – specifically, engaged in outside security work, which is not permitted under the Garda code.

“Two protected disclosures have been put in, in relation to this. It’s being investigated by the National Bureau of Criminal Investigation.

“And the allegation also contains claims that false alarms were set off at a business and these were responded to by gardaí, in squad cars, patrol cars, in emergency fashion, with sirens blaring and lights flashing.

“And then these false alarms were then reported on the Garda PULSE system. So all this is being investigated by the National Bureau of Criminal Investigation.”

Later, the AGSI’s general secretary John Jacob told Ms Byrne:

“The association issued a press release last night in relation to this matter and they said that they haven’t been formally informed that an investigation of any sort is taking place and that the person involved has not been formally notified of an investigation taking place. But we have to believe the media reports when they say that one is taking place.”

“…The association does not know the details of the allegation.”

Mr Jacob also said the AGSI does not know who the allegation allegedly concerns.


Two senior AGSI members opt out of conference (RTE)

Masked gardai assist the removal of protestors from North Frederick Street

Following on from Minister for Justice Charlie Flanagan telling Seán O’Rourke on RTÉ Radio One yesterday morning that he would support legislation to outlaw photographing on-duty gardai

Aidan O’Brien, who filmed a Reclaim The Streets protest in Dublin in 2002, recalls…

Related: Garda who hit man’s head with baton is now an expert adviser on ethics (The Irish Sun)

Previously: Never Mind The Balaclavas

Nothing To Hear Here

According to the source of the top pic, the Greater Manchester Police van was due to be auctioned in 2014.


Pics: Flickr and Jack Power

Earlier: ‘How Can You Justify These Actions?’

Yesterday: What’s Going On Here?

Related: Van used by masked men to secure Dublin property not taxed since 2014 (Jack Power, The Irish Times)

Rialto Youth Project in Rialto, Dublin 8

Cónall Thomas, in the Dublin Inquirer, writes:

Over four years, Fiona Whelan gathered stories from young people in Rialto in answer to the request: talk about a moment in your life when you felt powerful or powerless.

Many of the 60 anonymous accounts she collected had one thing in common: they touched on encounters with gardaí.

“I’d say I get stopped 20 times a month. 20 times a month just for walking around,” wrote one young man from Rialto. “I’d be walking, a Garda car would see me and stop and ask me where I’m going.”

As the project snowballed and interest grew, Whelan, an artist in residence at the Rialto Youth Project, and Jim Lawlor, the manager there, worked it into something practical: two modules that could be taught to gardaí during their training – to help them work better with children in the neighbourhood and further afield.

But while it looked for a while as if the modules might be taken up, almost a decade on they are still pushing for that to happen

Gardaí need better training on how to handle kids in the inner-city, some say (Cónal Thomas, Dublin Inquirer)

Rialto Youth Project

From top: Lorraine McCabe and Sgt Maurice McCabe; Ken Ruane, Head of Legal Affairs in An Garda Siochana.

This afternoon.

At the Disclosures Tribunal in Dublin Castle.

It has heard and seen notes provided to the tribunal by solicitor Annemarie Ryan, of the Chief State Solicitor’s office, of the very first consultation meeting involving gardai and counsel for the gardai at the Four Courts on the afternoon of May 11, 2015.

The legal team which represented the former Garda Commissioner Noirin O’Sullivan and other gardai – namely Colm Smyth SC,  Michael McNamee BL, and Garret Byrne BL – arrived about ten minutes after the meeting started.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the upcoming first module of the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation – namely one of the incidents which the commission was tasked with investigating, namely a public order incident and possible sexual assault on a bus in Kingscourt, County Cavan.

The notes were introduced by Patrick Marrinan, SC, for the tribunal, as the Head of Legal Affairs in An Garda Siochana Ken Ruane gave evidence.

The tribunal saw and heard that Ms Ryan’s notes provided a lot more detail of the meeting than Mr Ruane’s notes.

They showed how Chief Supt Fergus Healy, who was the liaison officer for Ms O’Sullivan at the commission, alerted the counsel to the Ms D case and criminal investigation that was carried out into Sgt McCabe in 2006.

Speaking about what is in the notes, Mr Marrinan SC, for the tribunal, put it to Mr Ruane that: “This has absoltuely nothing to do with the facutal matters to be investigated by the O’Higgins.”

Mr Ruane agreed.

Mr Marrinan also pointed out the derogatory comment made about Garda whistleblower John Wilson – without reading it out – and said there was as suggestion that there was some collusion between Garda Wilson and Sgt McCabe.

The notes also claim Sgt McCabe said: “I will bring this job to its knees”.

Mr Marrinan tried to get an understanding from Mr Ruane why these matters were being discussed at the meeting at all.

He also pointed out that the fact they were being discussed flew in the face of the public statements being made by Ms O’Sullivan in which she repeated her support for Sgt McCabe at that time.

Mr Ruane said it wasn’t clear from the minutes who was asking questions at the meeting but he said counsel had been asking questions to understand a “breakdown” in interpersonal relationships between Sgt McCabe and some of his colleagues.

Mr Marrinan again asked if it didn’t strike Mr Ruane as “peculiar” that these matters were being explored as he said the matters questioned Sgt McCabe’s motivation. He asked Mr Ruane if he felt that was correct?

Mr Ruane said he didn’t agree that all the matters mentioned were in relation to Sgt McCabe’s motivation.

Mr Marrinan suggested it was the thrust of the minutes.

Mr Ruane also told the tribunal of a phone call he received from Ms Ryan at 11pm on the night of Saturday, May 16, 2015 – the night after the legal row broke out at the commission – when the matter of Sgt McCabe’s motivation came into question.

The purpose of the call was for information, Mr Ruane said. He said Ms Ryan wasn’t looking for further instructions.

Mr Marrinan suggested Ms Ryan was concerned that matters had “blown up” on the afternoon of May 15, 2015 and that the items discussed at the May 11 meeting had “spilled over into the inquiry’s hearings”.

Mr Ruane told the tribunal that it was made clear to him that instructions had been taken from the then Garda Commissioner Noirin O’Sullivan to raise the issue on May 15, 2015.

Mr Marrinan asked him if it crossed his mind to call Ms O’Sullivan after his conversation with Ms Ryan.

Mr Ruane said, although the Garda Commissioner had received legal advice on the Friday, perhaps he should have called or communicated with the commissioner about the instructions given to counsel, given the public statements and official line of support towards Sgt McCabe.

Mr Ruane said: “There was no one more acutely aware of the corporate policy adopted towards Maurice McCabe than Noirin O’Sullivan.”

Earlier: ‘It Was Dragged Back In, In A Collateral Way To Demean Him’



Just before Mr Ruane finished giving evidence, Judge Charleton asked Mr Ruane about some of the specific entries in Ms Ryan’s minutes.

In respect of the entry about the meeting in the hotel in Monaghan, Judge Charleton put it to Mr Ruane that the only reason this would be introduced, “would be to say, ‘look, this is someone who tends to exaggerate…’.”

Mr Ruane agreed and said he couldn’t remember why it was brought up.

Judge Charleton said it was hard to imagine how it could have had “anything” to do with the events being considered by the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation.

Mr Ruane agreed and said it had “nothing to do with the facts” relative to the matters being investigated by the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation.

Similarly, Judge Charleton drew attention to the line: “McCabe had issues at why this allegation was investigated. McCabe sought access to his file and was refused the file.”

The judge said: “I can’t imagine where that came from? That never happened as far as I know.”

Mr Ruane suggested that perhaps Chief Supt Healy meant “access to the directions” instead of “access to the file”.

Judge Charleton said he had read a lot and heard a lot of evidence. He said the Independent Review Mechanism looked the file on the Ms D allegation and he said he looked at the file. He suggested the word ‘file’ was an obvious word to use.

He then asked Mr Ruane if anyone, in fact, said this.

Mr Ruane repeated that perhaps Chief Supt Healy meant “directions” instead of “file”.

Judge Charleton suggested that the line could have implied Sgt McCabe was a “bitter man”.

Mr Ruane said he understood Sgt McCabe had been vindicated fully.

In respect of the line “McCabe’s initial sexual assault incident re: colleague’s minor daughter. Noel Cunningham will give us full details of this”, Judge Charleton asked why this would be raised given the DPP ruled there was no assault.

Mr Ruane said perhaps it was a reference to the Sgt McCabe seeking the DPP’s directions.

As for the reference to Garda John Wilson, Judge Charleton said he couldn’t understand the note that Sgt McCabe and Garda Wilson may have been “working together”.

The judge said in relation to the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation and the IRM, the two men were never on the same case.

Mr Ruane agreed and said it was his understanding that they both raised concerns about penalty points.

Echoing Mr Marrinan from earlier, Judge Charleton said Ms Ryan’s notes indicated that the thrust of what was heard at the meeting was that Sgt McCabe was a bitter man, led by emotion which could have led to unconscious bias.

He added it was easy to be wise in hindsight but he suggested the matters being raised were “liable to muddy the waters” and that someone should have said that ‘this may be the background but it has certainly nothing to do with anything that is going to come up in front of Mr Justice O’Higgins’.

Mr Ruane said “I have to agree with you there.”

Asked if he thought someone should have shouted that, Mr Ruane said: “With hindsight, possibly, yes.”

This morning.

Members of senior Garda management are fielding questions in the Oireachtas justice and equality committee in light of the Crowe Horwath report for the Policing Authority on the fake breath tests and issuing of summonses.

Readers will recall how, on Sunday, November 27, 2017, Independents 4 Change TD Mick Wallace, while speaking about the gardai, told TV3’s The Sunday Show:

Myself and Clare Daly have some new stuff to break very soon that would make the hair stand on your head about stuff that’s happening at present.”

Further to this…

At the justice committee this morning, Mick Wallace said:

Only this week, we met a member of An Garda Siochana, he’s just put in a protected disclosure and he’s out sick for a while due to stress from work.

“And he’s given us incredibly detailed information about things that have been happening, right up unit recently.

“To be honest, we found it hard to believe that such things that he told us about could still be happening. And the way that, when he raised concerns about several issues, how they were dealt with by senior management.

“It was really disheartening for us because you know what, people might think that ‘oh, Daly and Wallace just want to be giving out about things’. But you know what, we won’t be vindicated until we have a police force that everyone will be proud of.

“And we’ve been tackling issues for over five years and if nothing has changed, well, that means, we’re wasting our time and we’ve failed. We want things to be done right.

“But it was really disappointing to look at the information he gave us around this, he’s put in a protected disclosure, we haven’t put it into the public domain yet.

“But, I suppose his basis to it was, not much has changed yet.”

“Now, I still believe, I’m an optimist by nature and I think things will change but sadly not enough has changed. And poor Maurice McCabe…is lucky to still be alive, that he didn’t do away with himself when the pressure was so great at times.

“But it would be very sad for him if nothing changes and very disappointing for him because nobody wanted change in the gardai, and having done his work, than of the people that came forward anyway, than Maurice McCabe.”

Watch the committee live here

Today’s Irish Daily Mail; Jobstown protest in 2014; Ken Purcell arriving at the Criminal Courts of Justice in Dublin last month

Further to a jury last Thursday returning a unanimous ‘not guilty’ verdict to the Jobstown protesters – who had been charged with the false imprisonment of former Tánaiste Joan Burton and her adviser Karen O’Connell…

It’s being reported that on Friday, two superintendents who recommended to the DPP that the protesters be charged with false imprisonment – an offence which carries a penalty of up to life imprisonment – were promoted.

In today’s Irish Daily Mail, Journalist Ali Bracken reports:

The two superintendents who recommended that the recently acquitted Jobstown protesters be charged with false imprisonment have been promoted to the rank of chief superintendent.

Superintendents Brian Sutton and Peter Duff, both based in Dublin Metropolitan Region South, led the investigation into the so-called Jobstown Seven.

…On Friday, 15 superintendents were informed that they have been promoted to the rank of chief superintendent following an interview selection process. Their appointments were made by the independent Policing Authority.

Further to this.

Readers will recall how the false imprisonment charges against one of the Jobstown protesters, Ken Purcell, were dropped on June 12 after Judge Melanie Greally ruled that an extension to Mr Purcell’s detention was unlawful.

Mr Purcell had been arrested at his home in Tallaght at 7.28am on February 13, 2015, by Garda Darren Rooney.

Mr Purcell’s initial detention was authorised by Sergeant Carlin Cullen – based on information Garda Rooney gave Sgt Cullen which he had obtained from viewing video footage, and information which Judge Melanie Greally later found to be “inaccurate and exaggerated”.

On February 13, 2015, Mr Purcell’s detention was extended by Supt Peter Duff, at 1.11pm, also based on information given to him by Garda Rooney. This extension was found to be unlawful.

Judge Greally ruled:

The information imparted by Garda Rooney was based on his viewing of video footage and for the purposes of this application can be divided into three limbs. The first limb is the description of the accused at two stages where he is said to have struggled with gardaí.

The second is an account of the accused behaving aggressively in front of the jeep when it was attempting to leave the grounds of Saint Thomas’s Church and the third is what is accepted to be accurate information concerning his participation in a sit down in front of the jeep on Fortunestown Road.

In Garda Rooney’s description of Kenneth Purcell’s conduct around the Avensis he stated he was start of the crowd and could be seen struggling with gardaí. Similarly, during the transfer from the Avensis to the garda jeep he was said to have struggled with gardaí.

A viewing of the footage by this Court showed no identifiable physical engagement between the accused and any member of An Garda Síochána, either at the Avensis or during the transfer.

A more accurate appraisal of his actions during the transfer from the Avensis to the jeep is that he can be seen in the footage moving from a somewhat peripheral position towards the advancing group of gardaí and protesters and he is subsequently visible in the thick of it.

Therefore the information imparted to Sergeant Cullen in this regard was inaccurate and exaggerated.

Continue reading

This morning.

It’s being reported that a report by the Government’s Special Rapporteur on Child Protection Dr Geoffrey Shannon (above) on Ireland’s child protection system – looking at 5,400 cases, from 2008 to 2015, where gardaí removed children from their parents under Section 12 of the Child Care Act – is to be published.

It will be published by Assistant Garda Commissioner John O’Driscoll.

Section 12 of the act allows gardai to remove a child if they believe there is a serious risk to the child’s health or welfare.

It’s being reported that both Tusla and the gardaí are criticised in the report.

Further to this.

Aoife Hegarty, of RTÉ Investigates, spoke to Audrey Carville on Morning Ireland earlier, ahead of her own report on the matter this evening.

Ms Hegarty said, in addition to a report on Mr Shannon’s examination, she’ll be looking at “disturbing revelations” concerning a boy in the south east of Ireland.

Ms Hegarty said:

“We’ve been following a number of child protection cases. They include a case that’s currently before the courts in which our child protection services again come under the spotlight. In terms of the actions that the Child Family Agency Tusla has, or indeed hasn’t, taken in terms of vulnerable children.

We also examine another case which we came across again a child was left in a foster placement, despite allegations of sexual abuse and we’ll show various documentation from that case which we’ve seen and lastly, we’ll feature new revelations on the quality of care provided by child protection services in the south east.

“I suppose by now we’re all well familiar with the very sad story of Grace, that young woman with profound intellectual disabilities who was left in a foster home in the south east for 20 years, despite serious allegations, a woman who was recently awarded over €6million in the High Court.

But tonight, we reveal yet more disturbing revelations from the Waterford area. This time in relation to the care provided to a young boy. In all, the programme raises very serious questions for our child protection authorities and whether, in all cases, they’re functioning adequately.

RTÉ Investigates is on RTÉ One at 10.35pm this evening.

Call for cultural change in child protection system (RTE)

mauriceScreen Shot 2017-03-01 at 12.01.13

From top: Maurice McCabe; Katie Hannon and David McCullagh on Prime Time last night

Last night.

On RTÉ’s Prime Time.

Prime Time‘s political correspondent Katie Hannon gave a further update on the allegations of a smear campaign against Sgt Maurice McCabe which are now being investigated by the Disclosures Tribunal, headed by Mr Justice Peter Charleton, of the Supreme Court.

Readers will recall how, in her original Prime Time report on the matter, on February 9, 2017, Ms Hannon explained the sequence of events that led to Sgt McCabe becoming the subject of a false allegation of child abuse in a Tusla file, due to a “clerical error”.

In her February 9 report, Ms Hannon reported that an email from May 2014 indicated the counsellor – after realising she made the serious error in a referral letter about Sgt McCabe to Tusla –

believed that the local superintendent, the superintendent in the relevant district, had been asked to meet the Garda Commissioner in relation to this case. And there was some anxiety that this superintendent hadn’t been brought up to date about the error in the file and it had to be sent to him immediately”

The Garda press office told Prime Time that Garda Commissioner Noirin O’Sullivan had no meeting with the superintendent in question in May, 2014 and did not request such a meeting.

Further to this, and having seen this email, Francesca Comyn, of The Sunday Business Post reported, on February 12, that the email from the counsellor to Tusla stated:

I had another call in relation to the retrospective report which as you are aware contains a clerical error. I was informed that the superintendent in the jurisdiction referred to in the report was not yet aware of the clerical error and has been asked to meet with the Garda Commissioner in relation to the case.”

Further to this…

From last night’s (2 mins and 25 second) report from Katie Hannon on Prime Time

David McCullagh: “The Disclosures Tribunal into allegations there was a smear campaign against Sgt Maurice McCabe is under way but it will be some time before public hearings commence. Before that, our political correspondent Katie Hannon joins us to clear up one key issue in relation to the revelation of a Tusla file containing false allegations of a serious sexual assault. Katie, what’s tonight’s story all about?”

Katie Hannon: “There’s two terms of reference, within the 16 terms of reference that Peter Charleton is going to be looking at, at this tribunal. One is to inquire whether this Tusla file was  knowingly used by senior members of An Garda Siochana to  discredit Sgt McCabe and another of the terms asks what the former and current Garda Commissioners [Martin Callinan and Noirin O’Sullivan] knew about these matters.”

“So, go back to that Tusla file. Questions have already been raised. I discussed it in this studio about an email that was in that file released to the McCabes which seemed to indicate that the Garda Commissioner had asked for a meeting way back in May 2014 – in relation to what was in that file. Now, we put this to the Garda Commissioner at the time and  she told us she had not requested that meeting, that meeting did not happen.”

McCullagh: “So, do we know what that email actually referred to?”

Hannon: “So, we now can say what that meeting, what that email referred to. I’ve now learned that the “commissioner” referred to in that email was actually the assistant commissioner for the northern region at the time, the former commissioner Kieran Kenny. According to an informed source, assistant commissioner Kenny met with the superintendent, the relevant superintendent that month, in May 2014 and, crucially, he sent a full report of this meeting to Garda Headquarters.

So, basically, the upshot of this is that we now know that, two and a half years ago, Garda Headquarters were made aware that there was this allegation of child rape recorded by Tusla against Sgt Maurice McCabe and also that it had been subsequently withdrawn and described as a clerical error.”

And the questions that will be raised, presumably at the tribunal will be: what did they do on foot of that? We know, for a fact, that they did not contact Maurice McCabe. In fact, I understand that Sgt McCabe has yet to have any contact from Garda Headquarters even since this whole story broke a short time ago. We asked the Garda Press Office about this, they said they were precluded from commenting because the tribunal is now up and running. We asked the Justice Minister [Frances Fitzgerald] if she’d been briefed about it and, again, she declined to comment, saying it would be inappropriate because the tribunal has now commenced.”


In addition to reports of contact being made between the gardai and the counsellor after the discovery of the error, in May 2014, it has also been reported that there was at least an attempt by a Tusla social worker to contact a garda just after the false allegation/error was initially communicated by the counsellor to Tusla in August 2013.

Following an allegation made against Sgt McCabe in 2006, a file was sent to  the DPP – with the recommendation that there was no grounds for a prosecution – and that the DPP directed that no prosecution should be taken, with the observation that it was doubtful the allegations should constitute a crime at all.

In her original report on the matter, on February 9, Ms Hannon reported that, within days of the counsellor notifying Tusla of the false allegation – presumably without realising her referral contained a mistake/false allegation – a Tusla social worker contacted the garda who investigated the original 2006 complaint made against Sgt McCabe, to request a meeting.

However, it’s not known if that meeting took place.

Watch back in full here

Previously: Pasted In Error