Author Archives: Admin

RTÉ studios in Donnybrook, Dublin 4

Mark Tighe, in yesterday’s Sunday Times, reported:

Almost three-quarters of those who earn salaries of more than €100,000 a year in RTE are men, according to figures obtained by The Sunday Times. By contrast, well over half of RTE staff paid less than €40,000 are women.

…This has now been confirmed in figures supplied after a freedom of information request to the station.

They cover basic salary of staff members, and not contractors, overtime or allowances.

The figures show that, while women made up 48.3% of RTE’s 1,984 staff at the end of 2016, they accounted for just 29.6% of the 125 workers whose basic annual salary was more than €100,000.

RTE cheques in the male (Mark Tighe, The Sunday Times)

Previously: They’re Back!

Michael O’Leary, of Ryanair

Joe Brennan, in The Irish Times, reports:

Ryanair has lost as much as €2.1 billion of its market value since the middle of last week, as the carrier’s move to scrap thousands thousands of flights over the next six weeks added to the impact of news on Thursday of a potentially costly European court ruling.

Shares in the low-cost airline fell as much as 4.8 per cent on Monday to €16.25, their lowest level since May, bringing its losses since markets closed on Wednesday to 9.9 per cent.

Its market value has fallen from €21.4 billion to €19.3 billion.

Ryanair moved on Friday to say it will operate a programme of flight cancellations over the next six weeks because of pilot shortage difficulties.

…The Commission for Aviation Regulation is meeting Monday to discuss Ryanair’s decision.

Cancellation fiasco and EU court woes wipe €2bn off Ryanair value (Joe Brennan, The Irish Times)

Rollingnews

UPDATE:


We want what he’s smoking.

Burkean Journal and Declan Ganley

Financially backed by Irish entrepreneur and conservative Declan Ganley, a new publication, promising to combat the “degeneracy” spreading across the west, will launch in Trinity this week.

The online-only student-led publication, the Burkean Journal, will discuss contemporary issues in Ireland from a right-wing, conservative perspective.

The publication takes its name from Edmund Burke, the renowned Trinity scholar often referred to as the “father of conservatism”. Online already are a number of articles addressing safe spaces, the abortion debate and populism.

Ganley, whose son Micheál is the publication’s secretary, has loaned the board of the publication €600 in seed funding, which will be paid back from the editorial team’s own pockets.

Final-year classics student Guillermo Dillon will serve as editor of the publication.

Speaking to The University Times, Deputy Editor and one of the founders of the publication Louis Hoffman said that its aim was “to promote conservative ideas on campus” in response to the “sterile” debate on campus.

Hoffman, a third-year history student, said the publication was, in part, an attempt to challenge what the editorial team see as a left-wing monopoly on campus. “You can say and think what you want as long as you think exactly what [they] think”, he said.

Those on the editorial team see their role as important in stopping the “degeneracy” that Hoffman said is “spreading like wildfire across the western world at the minute”.

Citing the cancellation of Fox News in the UK, Hoffman said he was concerned at the lack of a “platform” for conservative ideas. The Burkean Journal’s editorial team will not restrict growth of the publication: “The aim is to start in Trinity and then spread out.” 

Declan Ganley Financially Backs New Conservative Student Publication (University Times)

Thanks Harry O’Brien

A Garda checkpoint

Yesterday.

On RTÉ’s This Week.

Justin McCarthy spoke to a female civilian who was working in a garda station as a clerical officer when she claims she saw a garda breathalysing himself.

Before playing the interview, listeners were told that that the woman has since made a complaint of bullying against the garda in question and three other members of the force working at that station.

The woman’s identity was protected in the interview.

Civilian: “I’ve been doing this job for the past 25 years, working as a civilian.”

Justin McCarthy: “Tell me what happened on the day that you say you saw a garda breathalysing himself.”

Civilian: “Yes, on the 24th of January, 2014, I was working in the garda station, as a clerical officer between 3pm and 4pm on that date. I walked into the public office. The garda in question was sitting at a desk. I noticed the garda had alcometer in his hand and was blowing, full force, into the alcometer.”

McCarthy: “And what happened then? Did you speak to the garda about what you saw?”

Civilian: “Yes, I also noticed that he had a bundle of tubes in the other hand and a blank form in front of him and I straight away questioned him as to what he was doing. His reply was that, ‘oh, I’m just making up some numbers’. He looked embarrassed and I thought I caught him on the hop.”

McCarthy: “When he said he was making up some numbers, what did you take that to mean?”

Civilian:I straight away, automatically assumed that that meant that he was falsifying the data.

McCarthy: “Did you challenge the garda about his reply to you?”

Civilian: “I did. I said, straight away to the guard, that what he was doing was morally and ethically wrong.”

McCarthy: “Did you speak to anybody at senior level in the garda station about what you’d seen?”

Civilian: “Yes, well, first of all I spoke to the sergeant about two days after their return on duty and told them what I had seen; they gave no reply, or asked no questions about that. I then reported the matter in July 2014 to the Superintendent in that area, along with more issues that I wanted to report.”

McCarthy: “And did you get any response? Did you know if any particular action was taken in relation to the concerns that you raised about the garda that you say was blowing into a breathalyser.”

Civilian: “I don’t know what actions they would have taken myself personally, about that.”

McCarthy: “Do you know if any disciplinary action was taken in respect of the garda that you saw breathalysing himself?”

Civilian: “I don’t know. I mean, I didn’t make a statement so I don’t know if they were able to investigate it or not.”

McCarthy: When you say you didn’t make a statement, are you saying you made a complaint but that you weren’t asked to make a formal statement as part of any investigation into this incident?

Civilian:Well, I was asked if I wanted to but, on advice given, I opted not to.

McCarthy: “Were there any other witnesses or did anybody else see this happening? Or do you have any independent way of verifying what you saw?”

Civilian: “No, there were no other witnesses, it was just what I saw myself and what he admitted to me.”

McCarthy: “And you took that to mean that the garda in question was deliberately falsifying, elevating breath test numbers by blowing into tubes himself?”

Civilian: “Yes, I do. It was my gut instinct. I used my gut instinct and I straight away assumed that that was what he was doing.”

McCarthy: “There are two ways, I suppose, that breath tests could be falsified. One is by recording incorrect data on the PULSE system and another way is by blowing into a breathalyser, if a member of the force were to blow into a breathalyser themselves, would there be any way of checking if a test had been faked if a garda were to blow into a breathalyser themselves?

Civilian: “I don’t think so and this is the point I’m trying to get across here, is that my belief is that the figures given, the one and a half million, could be way worse because this method, if used, is totally undetectable. Everything looks perfect on paper. If you breathalyse yourself using the alcometer, the alcometer will tally perfectly with the return, meaning it’s uninvestigatable.”

Listen back in full here

Meanwhile…

Spokesman for the Garda Representative Association John O’Keeffe and RTE’s Paul Reynolds

Further to Paul Reynolds’s interview with spokesman for the Garda Representative Association John O’Keeffe on Thursday evening…

On Saturday.

Ellen Coyne, in The Times Ireland edition, reported:

A spokesman for the Garda Representative Association has accused RTÉ News of “ridiculing” him and threatened to sue over the broadcasting of an interview with him about the breath test figures scandal.

John O’Keeffe has claimed there was an understanding that some of his answers would be edited or deleted before broadcast. He alleged that RTÉ released the interview in full because it was biased against the GRA and was trying to push its own agenda.

Last night [Friday] RTÉ stood by its actions and said it had fairly challenged the GRA on an issue of “major public and national interest”. It denied all the allegations made by Mr O’Keeffe.

…Mr O’Keeffe said that the reporter repeatedly asked him the same question, “a line he is of course entirely entitled to pursue”.

“However, on a number of occasions during this interview, we paused for retakes on my answers — this was fully understood by both Mr Reynolds and the cameraman and was indeed commented on by myself for the avoidance of any doubt.”

The GRA spokesman and press officer claimed it was “understood by all of us” that some answers would be deleted accordingly. He detailed his unhappiness that the entire “unedited ‘interview’ was included”.

This was something that was never broadcast by the RTÉ newsroom, he said. “All such interviews are always edited for television, unless there has clearly been no retakes.

“The only reason Mr Reynolds and/or RTÉ would have included a full, very clearly unedited interview on this one exceptional occasion was to hold me up to ridicule and contempt because Mr Reynolds and/or his editor did not agree with the GRA position as spoken by myself. This assertion is supported by Mr Reynolds’s behaviour and language earlier in the day.”

The suggestion that either Mr Reynolds or any RTÉ staff member involved in the interview were biased was dismissed by the broadcaster last night [Friday].

Journalist wanted to ridicule me, GRA spokesman claims (Ellen Coyne, The Times Ireland edition)

Previously: ‘They Falsified Them Under Pressure From Gardai’

A Breathtaking Timeline

George Hook

Further to the suspension of George Hook from Newstalk…

Tom Lyons, Deputy Editor of the Sunday Business Post, was Business Editor at Newstalk in 2006 and 2007.

In yesterday’s paper, Mr Lyons wrote:

My own experience is this: in 2007, Hook banned me from appearing on his programme for having the effrontery to want to break a story. My mistake was to insist he aired extracts from a fascinating speech made by the country’s then richest man, Seán Quinn, about his life and times.

Hook declined. He is entitled to put out whatever he likes, but I would have been remiss as business editor not to try and get an exclusive story on air.

Hook never explained to me why he didn’t like the story, but I knew it would make page one of the papers the following day and that we were ahead of RTÉ.

My instructions from Newstalk, and directly from [Denis] O’Brien, were to break stories and I knew this was a good one.

Eventually Harte managed to get the story on air for a few minutes. Hook was professional on air but he was clearly furious.

Afterwards Harte informed me I was banned from the station’s most listened-to show. When I protested that this was unfair, he told me he was sorry but: “George is George.” I never appeared on The Right Hook again.

High Noon For Hook: Lyons On Newstalk (The Sunday Business Post)

Tom Lyons

Meanwhile…

On Facebook…

A page called Bring Back George Hook has, as of this morning, gained 1,153 likes.

Bring Back George Hook (Facebook)

Previously: Hook Suspended